Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've had a text and email from MCB: "Dear XXXXX Please contact us today. Your payment has not been brought up to date and we would like to discuss your account with you as a matter of urgency. Our telephone number is 02039236888"   " Early investigations confirm you are resident at the above address. Despite this, we have not managed to speak to you about your now, seriously overdue debt.   We are now instructing our external debt collectors to contact you directly in relation to your loan account. If you want to avoid this course of action, contact us today on 0203 923 6888"
    • What type of finance is it?   HP, PCP, Loan? They want her to ring so they can bully her into making payments she can't afford...unless she can record her calls then IMHO, I'd keep everything in writing. Is £400 SSP her only income? There's no chance they will justify taking half of that.   Lodge a formal complaint with them ASAP, exhaust it, and then you can escalate it sooner rather than later, ruddy sharks!  
    • Is all of this actually on the signage? Don't remember seeing that much detail on other threads.
    • If I have learnt one thing from this forum, it's not to call and communicate via email. I passed this info on to her and they are pushing for her to call them.    "Unfortunately, you will need to call us. The conversation won’t be so black and white as to therefore type over email. In a nutshell we can confirm that the request to not pay for 3 months we cannot put in place"  I emailed them back on her behalf and said that what ever is discussed over the phone will need to be put in an email so that she can review it properly. No decisions will be made on that phone call.    "Once we speak to you on the phone we will follow up with an email to confirm the options discussed. [Phone number]"   Why are they pushing for a phone call? If its not so black and white, why can they then follow up with an email?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome finance secured passed to MKRR??


klgrant
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

we have a so called secure loan with welcome finance , we got behind with payments a while ago they hassled us for a while but then just stopped , we had the odd letter we have never had a default even though we havent made a payment for ages, this was a third charge and i still cant believe they managed to get it secured or even bothered as there was no equity in our property , and there definatley isnt now, we have been trying for a few months to sort out some payment arrangement but nobody from welcome was able to talk to us about it as they didnt seem to know much about it???? anyway i recieved a letter this morning from a company called MKRR stating that they were writing with the objective of finding a solution to resolve the debt ? i rang them up to make an arrangement and were told that they now owned the debt, how come i wasnt aware of this??? shouldnt i have been notified?? and also on my credit file welcome have listed this as a morgage and its a secured loan, the bloke at MKRR even said it was a secured loan not a morgage . is it worth me looking into the original agreement to see if its valid or not and could i complain about it being a secured loan when there was no equity in my property when they secured it???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It may be worth you sending a CCA request and Subject access requestlink3.giflink3.giflink8.gif to have a look a what Welcome have been doing to your account.

CCA should be returned to you within 14 days and Subject access requestlink3.giflink3.giflink8.gif can take up to 40 days. (included in the Subject access requestlink3.giflink8.gif should be all info regarding your account including statements which should tell you the information you require regarding charges etc).

The CCA will cost £ 1 (postal order) send recorded delivery.

The Subject access requestlink3.giflink8.gif will cost £ 10 (postal order) send recorded delivery.

When sending these requests do not signlink3.giflink3.gifyour name just print.

 

Letter templates below.

http://www.consumerforums.com/resour...request-letter

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resour...est-debt-a-dca

 

Once you recieve your documents post them up on your thread and the more experienced on here will lend a hand.

 

Send to..

Welcome Finance Compliance Services Mere Way Ruddington Nottingham NG11 6NZ

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that i will do , and thanks for the address as i had no idea where to send anything , i just hope they are more understandable than the ones i recieved from black horse:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

agree with pwg! good luck :)

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If MKRR do truly now own the debt you should have received a Notice of Assignment. Ideally this should have come from the selling company, but it seems generally comes from the purchasing one.

 

You basically want to see that NoA, if it exists. I've been trying to think of the best way to get it. I don't think there is any provision for it to be provided to you under a CCA request. If it has been sold Welcome should respond to your CCA request telling you this and returning your postal order. You could then send the CCA request to MKRR.

 

So I agree, send the CCA and SAR requests to Welcome, and write a letter to MKRR asking them to prove they now own the debt. Tell them you have not received a NoA and want a copy of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what i want to know if welcome have sold this debt to MKRR , how can it still be a secured loan??? MKRR told me they now own the debt so they have obviously bought if from welcome , i also mentioned when i rang MKRR that when we took the loan i couldnt understand how they managed to secure it on the property as 1. we had no equity and 2, we already had a second secured loan and were only able to borrow a certain amount because it was the maximum the morgage company would allow, he said if there was was no equity he couldnt see why they would secure it as it wasnt in their interest as they would not get anything if the house was sold.

i also want to see the original agreement as this was the second agreement for the same loan as they did something to reduce the original payments and we were supposed to sign these obviously but i dont remember doing this , and another thing if this debt has been sold on then the entry by welcome on my credit file by welcome should read settled shouldnt it as i no longer have a debt with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

really! ill mention that when i next ring them then, i think i can feel a complaint coming on , is there any valid phone numbers available nowadays for welcome?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have checked my credit file and its still under welcome but hasnt been updated since february, also its down as a morgage on my credit file and it isnt it was a secured loan ive contacted experian about this and they are looking into it , i even mentioned to mkrr they said it was a secured loan aswell,

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's definitley NOT one of Welcomes subsiduaries. When it a debt gets passed to the Lewis Group, that is definitely still with the Cattles group, and TLG share the same systems with Welcome, and it can be passed back and forth. There is no such connection with MKDP, the loan has irrevokably been disposed of, and shows as a zero balance on all Cattles systems. If it is a part of the Cattles group, then it has been completely hidden from everyone I know, including senior management.

Link to post
Share on other sites

THIS COMPANY IS ONLY 7 MONTHS OLD:D

 

Name & Registered Office:

MKDP LLP

TRADE PRO HOUSE SEEBECK PLACE

KNOWLHILL

MILTON KEYNES

BUCKINGHAMSHIRE

MK5 8FR

Company No. OC349372

 

 

spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gif Status: Active

Date of Incorporation: 16/10/2009

 

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Limited Liability Partnership

Nature of Business (SIC(03)):

None Supplied

Accounting Reference Date: 30/06

Last Accounts Made Up To: (NO ACCOUNTS FILED)

Next Accounts Due: 30/03/2011

Last Return Made Up To:

Next Return Due: 13/11/2010

Previous Names: No previous name information has been recorded over the last 20 years. UK Establishment Details There are no UK Establishments associated with this company. Oversea Company Info There are no Oversea Details associated with this company.

System Requirements

 

Return to search page

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's definitley NOT one of Welcomes subsiduaries. When it a debt gets passed to the Lewis Group, that is definitely still with the Cattles group, and TLG share the same systems with Welcome, and it can be passed back and forth. There is no such connection with MKDP, the loan has irrevokably been disposed of, and shows as a zero balance on all Cattles systems. If it is a part of the Cattles group, then it has been completely hidden from everyone I know, including senior management.

 

MAY I ASK WHAT CONECTION YOU HAVE WITH CATTLES

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...