Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Potential problem removing private plate??


grantyblade
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone - hopefully quick question, can't find any answers on any other thread so far i'm afraid!

 

I have my car which has been parked off the road for last 2 months. MOT ran out end Jan 10. Tax runs out end of this month Apr 10. I have a private plate on the car which I need to remove and can either transfer it onto another car or I can put it onto retention. Question - Do the DVLA allow you to take a plate off a car that is not MOT'd? I would love to keep the plate however I don't want to possibly incur the charges of fixing the car to get it through it's MOT which maybe considerably more than the plate is worth (in money not sentiment!!) as I am about to get rid of the car.

 

Any info would be so appreciated. Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

I very much doubt it. I seem to recall that people used to buy some scrappy little moped for a tenner to put their private plate on, to "hold it" for free until they wanted to use it again thereby avoiding the £25 charge per year to put it on retention. When they wanted it on their shiny new car again I am sure they didn't go to the trouble of MOTing the scrap bike to get their number back off it. :)

Edited by crem
Link to post
Share on other sites

I very much doubt it. I seem to recall that people used to buy some scrappy little moped for a tenner to put their private plate on, to "hold it" for free until they wanted to use it again thereby avoiding the £25 charge per year to put it on retention. When they wanted it on their shiny new car again I am sure they didn't go to the trouble of MOTing the scrap bike to get their number back off it. :)

 

You now need an MOT to transfer a plate over.It's to stop people buying 'wrecks' from barns that are older than the hills just for the plate.

 

I tried to transfer my plate over from my car which had no MOT or tax,it had been SORNed for a few yrs but they wouldn't let me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do not need an MOT. The vehicle is taxed so you do not have a problem. If you do not make the application before the end of the month then declare SORN on the vehicle.

 

As long as the vehicle has a recent continuous tax history you should have no dramas as that proves that the vehicle has been roadworthy.

Edited by 'the dude'
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers dude. Would like to do it this week however I don't get paid till either 30/4/10 or 1/5/10, so can't afford to do it till then. Tax disc runs out 30/4/10, do you reckon I'd get a few days grace to do it in first few days of may?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Copied from the Directgov site:

 

Conditions for transferring a registration number

 

You can’t transfer a registration number:

 

  • starting with ‘Q’ or ‘NIQ’ for Northern Ireland registered vehicles
  • if it will make the vehicle it’s being transferred to look younger

To transfer the registration number, both vehicles must be:

 

  • registered at the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA)
  • available for inspection
  • of a type that needs an MOT or heavy goods vehicle (HGV) test certificate
  • currently taxed

However, if the vehicle that currently has the registration number is not taxed, you can still apply to transfer provided:

 

  • there is no break between the date the tax disc runs out and the start of the SORN
  • the tax disc run out no more than 12 months before the date you apply

Link to post
Share on other sites

Copied from the Directgov site:

 

Conditions for transferring a registration number

 

You can’t transfer a registration number:

 

  • starting with ‘Q’ or ‘NIQ’ for Northern Ireland registered vehicles
  • if it will make the vehicle it’s being transferred to look younger

To transfer the registration number, both vehicles must be:

 

  • registered at the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA)
  • available for inspection
  • of a type that needs an MOT or heavy goods vehicle (HGV) test certificate
  • currently taxed

However, if the vehicle that currently has the registration number is not taxed, you can still apply to transfer provided:

 

  • there is no break between the date the tax disc runs out and the start of the SORN
  • the tax disc run out no more than 12 months before the date you apply

 

 

Thanks Oily, I've read the DVLA rules previously and am a little confused because it doesn't say that a car must have a current MOT just that:-

 

********** of a type that needs an MOT or heavy goods vehicle (HGV) test certificate **********

So do I presume that it doesn't need current MOT? Well I'm going to have to go and try it next week!

 

On a separate note - sorry for maybe sounding dumb - but if I pay £105 to put it on retention, would I then still have to pay £80 to then re assign to a new car in maybe a few months?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like that just specifies that it must be the sort that gets MOTed but doesn't have to actually have a current one?

The adverts that this forum puts around my username and message are not endorsed by me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a separate note - sorry for maybe sounding dumb - but if I pay £105 to put it on retention, would I then still have to pay £80 to then re assign to a new car in maybe a few months?

 

No, the assignment fee is part of the £105.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £105 is made up of the £80 assignment fee plus £25 for your first years retention payment. You can choose to pay £130 or £155 at this point if you already know that you wish to keep it on retention for 2 or 3 years.

 

You never lose the £80 even if you decide to surrender your reg plate as this is refundable on application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking from personal experience,when I tried to transfer my plate over from my car which didn't have an MOT or tax they flatly refused.:mad:

 

Your car failed on the "currently taxed" rule in their list though, so doesn't clarify the MOT question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your car failed on the "currently taxed" rule in their list though, so doesn't clarify the MOT question.

 

However, if the vehicle that currently has the registration number is not taxed, you can still apply to transfer provided:

 

  • there is no break between the date the tax disc runs out and the start of the SORN
  • the tax disc run out no more than 12 months before the date you apply

I complied with the above rules and still they wouldn't let me so i can only put it down to the car not having an MOT

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...