Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,  It has been a long time but I have had confirmation claim will proceed to hearing in roughly 1 months time.  I was wondering if anyone could advise on defence please.  A few questions I have are: 1) I didn't notify VCS that I was not the driver of the vehicle and the judge may look negatively on this point.  I did not receive any direction in correspondence from VCS  that I should inform them if I was not the driver and that was going to be the foundation for may argument on this point. 2) The vehicle is stopped at a zebra crossing.  Based on the images from VCS for around 10 seconds.  At that time there is someone standing near the zebra crossing and someone else enters my vehicle.  I was going to raise the point that stopping at a zebra crossing when someone is standing near it is to be expected.  I was also going to ask the question how you can have a no stopping zone when there are zebra crossings where the driver is required to stop. 3) The no stopping zone is clearly signposted, however, no drop off or pickup is not clearly signposted with one small sign at the zebra crossing, parallel to the road and on the passengers side.  I was going to challenge that no-drop off or pickup is clearly signposted.  4) VCS mentioned my initial defence was generic and clearly copied from the internet.  It covered 1) Claimant not being in a position to state if the Defendant was the driver at the time.  2) No evidence that claimant's contract with landowner supersedes byelaws & signage isn't legally binding contract. 3) No contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on speculative charge. I am interested to know if anyone has had success or been unsuccessful with this 'generic' defence. 5) If I should submit an updated defence to the court based on questions 1, 2 & 3.  Or if it is better to only raise these points in court? Thanks.  Any guidance would be appreciated  
    • I honestly don't know, Baz. In addition what I don't  understand (from that pamphlet) is this: The s88 criteria are quite clear and don't need a medical professional to interpret them . The one most relevant to his topic says that an application is not a "qualifying application" if a relevant disability has been declared. The problem with the word "may" is how does the applicant establish whether me "may" driver under s88 when he has not complied with its conditions? I don't know the answer to that either. But to further muddy the waters, the pamphlet says this (about : But the s88 statute says absolutely nothing like that at all. It simply says that if you have declared a relevant disability s88 does not apply. The DVLA pamphlet is simply confusing as far as I can see. That's actually my opinion and that's what I would stick to if it was me making the application. But I'll seek a few opinions from others over the next couple of days.
    • Perfect. Thanks so much. I’ll get these printed and posted tomorrow 
    • Looks good to me. We generally start letters to BW Legal "Dear Rachael and Sean" referring to their two directors.  It shows you've done your homework on their rubbish company.  Plus they must have traced the origin of these letters to CAG by now so they know you have back-up and will just cause them big trouble if they're daft enough to do court. Add the PCN reference at the top, at the bottom write COPIED TO G24 LTD, and over the next few days invest in two 2nd class stamps and get two free Certificates of Posting from the post office.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Appeal to Pay All Wages


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5178 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I was dismissed by my previous employer end of Jan 2010 and have a couple of questions regarding this dismissal.

 

a. My job was dismissed after 9 months of work. So I believe that a termination notice of 1 month applies in my case, as shown by contract termination clause below. It was not professional misconduct, so all normal regulations apply in my case.

My contract states,

NOTICE OF TERMINATION TO BE GIVEN BY EMPLOYER

Under 1 month's service - Nil

1 month but less than 5 years' service - 1 month

5 years' service or more - 1 week for each completed year of service to a maximum of 12 weeks after 12 years.

However, when I was paid my last salary on 29 Jan 2010, I was paid wages till the end of Jan 2010. To clarify this, I will state the dates below:

 

Disciplinary Meeting 12 Jan

Disciplinary Result 14 Jan (notice of dismissal on 31 Jan 2010)

Last Day at Work 17 Jan

Dates between 18 - 24 Jan, I consumed my pre planned holiday week

Suspended from Work 25 Jan

Appeal Hearing 26 Jan

Dismissed 31 Jan

 

After speaking to ACAS and Employment Tribunal, I am confused as to where my 1 month's notice starts from and ends ? (to allow me to claim from my employer)

 

b. Is there a template grevience letter to be sent to my previous employer asking for this money to be paid to me ?

 

If this is still confusing, please ask me...

All help appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

 

effective date of termination is the date the termination takes effect-usually the date the employee was told they were dismissed, for a dismissal with noitice the effective date of termination is usually the date when the notice period expires, even if the employee is paid in lieu of notice so they do not have to work the notice period, however a payment in lieu of notice may bring forward the EDT in some cases, and employees and reps should be made aware of this if the employer indicates that it intends the employment to finish staright away.

 

so just to go over what i beleive u mean on ur disaplinary result 14th of jan you were given pre notice that your EDT would be on the 31 jan, why have they then suspended you on the 25 jan after ur holiday when they have already told u that u are to be dismissed? you obviously had appealed there decision of dismissal and it went against u

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have thought you should have been paid up until 11/02/10 then.

Seems strange that you were suspended. Is there anything in your contract about 'garden leave, or pay in lieu of notice?

 

There is no clause in employment contract regarding gardening pay or pay in lieu of notice.

 

However, should I not count notice period from either:

 

a: 14 Jan 2010 (since that is the initial termination notice),

 

or

 

b: 26 Jan 2010 (since they uphelp the initial disciplinary decision on 26th)

 

(very confused at the moment!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

elpulpo was just about to ask that question about "garden leave" what type of business is this? a competive one with sensitive information available?

 

This is a not-so-large sports betting (bookies) organisation I used to work for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say the notice period starts from the original date of notice, 14/01/10.

Write to them stating that you think you should be paid up until 14/02/10, and ask that they explain why they've done otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

date of termination is the date they gave u on your letter 31 jan that was when you were dismissed im assuming u had been paid all the way through

 

I have been paid till 31 Jan 2010

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Seems pretty clear cut to me. Write to them pointing out that they should pay you up to 11/02/10.

 

Thanks for the great help. Can I ask you why should I ask for pay till 11-Jan and not 14-Jan ?

 

I believe my 90-day Tribunal deadline expires on 11 or 14-Jan following your advice. So I was wondering, if I send out a letter to ex-employers today, what sort of deadline should I give them to get this account settled, before I can seek Tribunal's assistance? ACAS suggested 14 or 7 days notice depending on how long I had.

 

Is there a template letter I could use for this then ?

 

Can I also ask another question kindly. I had also accrued 3 weeks paid holiday during my service there (1/12 for every month worked, if less than 12 months), and I had only used 2 weeks out of this. So I want to be paid for this holiday as well.

 

So in this letter, should I request my remaining salary + 1 weeks unused holiday entitlement + P45 to provided to me within 7 days?

 

Many thanks once again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The contract you've displayed is somewhat out of date regarding holiday entitlement so you'll find that they owe you a bit more than a week.

 

The statutory minimum paid holiday entitlement increased in the last few years and from April 2009 it has been 5.6 weeks (which can include bank holidays).

 

You can use the calculator below to work out your correct entitlement.

 

Calculate your employees' holiday entitlement | Business Link

Link to post
Share on other sites

The contract you've displayed is somewhat out of date regarding holiday entitlement so you'll find that they owe you a bit more than a week.

 

The statutory minimum paid holiday entitlement increased in the last few years and from April 2009 it has been 5.6 weeks (which can include bank holidays).

 

You can use the calculator below to work out your correct entitlement.

 

Calculate your employees' holiday entitlement | Business Link

 

Thanks for the link, but it is still quite confusing in my case.

 

I used to work for 39 hours (in 3 days) a week, plus every other Sunday.

So what would be my holiday entitlement ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My bad, I wrongly assumed that you worked full-time.

 

Your entitlement for a 3.5 day week would be 19.6 days, which would normally be rounded up to 20.

 

So, the contract was not out of date as I previously stated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My bad, I wrongly assumed that you worked full-time.

 

Your entitlement for a 3.5 day week would be 19.6 days, which would normally be rounded up to 20.

 

So, the contract was not out of date as I previously stated.

 

I worked full time, but because of the long hours in bookmakers industry, I used to work 39 hours in 3 long days (13 hours each day) between Mon-Sat and every other Sunday (once again counted as 13 hours).

 

So all-in-all, I still ended up doing 39 hours per week plus 2 or 3 Sundays a month.

 

Does it still hold on in this case ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...