Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • London1971 without divulging too much into his mental health he has issues regarding anything to do with government and so is it ok to fill the forms provided and what do I put on there  thanks  
    • Dear all, I am hoping for some advice/guidance on this matter. I received a LoC dated 12/04/24 and replied to this on the 2/05/24 disputing claim with the following reasons: 1: [Inadequate Affordability Assessment]: I contend that your institution failed to conduct a thorough assessment of my financial circumstances prior to approving the loan. As a result, the loan amount and repayment terms were not suitable for my income and financial situation. 2: [Unsustainable Repayments]: The repayment schedule imposed by the loan agreement placed an undue burden on my finances, making it impossible for me to meet my other financial obligations without experiencing significant hardship. 3: [Lack of Transparency]: Your institution did not adequately disclose the risks associated with the loan, including any potential increases in interest rates or fees over the loan term. I also added the following: Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, lenders have a legal obligation to conduct thorough affordability assessments and ensure that loan agreements are suitable for borrowers' circumstances. I hereby request that your institution: 1: Conduct a full investigation into my claim of irresponsible lending. 2: Provide me with copies of all documentation related to the loan application and approval process, including affordability assessments, credit checks, and correspondence. 3: Cease all collection activities related to the loan until this matter is resolved. Yesterday i received the attached reply via email and it included: 1: The Original Loan agreement 2: An account statement 3: A copy of a default notice letter. The email included a link for a direct debit set up page where you enter their reference and your bank account details (looks like a standard D/D set up page) but there is nothing to indicate the amount of the D/D that I might be agreeing to. I also think two days response time is not long enough to appropriately reply. Any thoughts appreciated   Email-compressed.pdf
    • Easy to set one up on Gov.uk , search on Google.
    • Hi London  he doesn’t have government gateway. Should we do it via post?
    • If you are helping a family member you are going to need their Government Gateway details in order to Log in to MCOL .
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My start with Barclaycard! £90 for statements?!


anttreas
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6583 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Thanks to Martin Lewis I have found out that I can claim back my charges!

I am going to start with Barclaycard.

When I phoned them originally the told me it would cost me £90+ for my statements.

With thanks to you all I am now going to try and get them with a DPA letter.

Will keep you posted! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read on other threads that they are claiming they dont have to supply more than 6 months due to the method of storage. Am I right in thinking this is a breach of the DPA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am as yet unsure how much in charges I have had with Barclays.

I have had an account with them now for about 8 years, including my time as a student so they may be high! :D

Have sent off my DPA letter and will keep you posted.

 

 

 

3rd April: UPDATED

As with Barclaycard, I also forgot to put the cheque in the envelope with my DPA letter to Barclays.

However (:D) they have informed me that they will send me all of my statments free of charge!

Again, they are asking what I mean by manual intervention, and are offering all 'subject data' if I forward on a cheque.

As far as Im concerned I think all i need are my statements, so I will leave it at that for now.

(Unfortunatly not so lucky with Barclaycard. They are demanding the £10 and other probs, see other thread.)

 

Thank you all!

Ant

 

editsign.gifPLEASE KEEP TO ONE THREAD PER INSTITUTION, OR IT MAKES THINGS TOO HARD TO FOLLOW. THANKS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome and good luck with your claim

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have just recieved my first letter back from Barlcaycard.

Being an idiot I forgot to enclose the £10 DPA cheque, so a slight delay on that front.

However, like other they are claiming, QUOTE:

 

"...I am obliged to advise only copy statements covering a maximum period from June 2004 to date will be provided. Prior to this time, statements are manually stored on microfiche and do not fall within data subject access provisions."

 

Anyone know what I can do about this and what wording to use?

 

Many thanks! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its looking like they are right :(

I am currently trudging through the DPA and it seems to be in their favour.

I tried to catch them out by phoning up to ask about information about a transaction that occured on my account nearly a year ago, hoping they would give me the information and I could prove they have it on their systems, but was told that they only keep 6 months on their system.

Il keep going through the DPA, if anyone has any further ideas please let me know.

Not finding any information as to how to get around the microfiche on the forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another update:

According to the DPA, if the microfiches are indexed by a computer they ARE a relevant filing system.

I cant honestly imagine they hand write every single statements location!

Things are looking up! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like there is nothing I can do.

Have contacted the ICO helpline, who stated that the DPA cannot in ""anyway, shape or form counteract bank charges for statements"".

Now I need to think whether it is worth it to me to pay up for the statements.

:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use the Standard letter in the Library section. I had 6 years off data sent in the post to me. :)

 

I used that and the reply was they will provide from June 2004 and no earlier due to the microfiche situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rang customer services and they sent statements going back to 2002 and took the money directly from my bank account, they must be a way round this or are they just been awkard.

 

Unfortunatly it looks like they are right. It seems strange because I sent exactly the same letter to Barclays and they replied saying they would forward all statements free of charge. I dont understand why Barlaycard are not the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having re-read the FAQ's (sorry dave!!!) I have noticed the section if they refuse the statements.

I have now sent a letter to Sharon Caffery at Barclays DPA dept including the following:

 

 

I am confused as to why the content of the statements prior to June 2004 are not covered by the Data Protection Act. As I understand it, provided the information in question can be linked to an identifiable individual the following are examples of personal data:

 

+ information about the medical history of an individual;

+ an individual's salary details;

+ information concerning an individual’s tax liabilities;

+ information comprising an individual’s bank statements; and

+ information about individual’s spending preferences

I would like to draw your attention to the case of Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] where Lord Justices Auld, Mummery and Buxton ruled that Bank Statement information, though not the statements themselves, is personal information and thus covered under the Data Protection Act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

After my initial letter to barclaycard with a DPA request, i was sent a letter saying that I could only have statements from June 2004 (strange 6 months!!!) and that I had forgotten to enclose my cheque. They said they would give me my statements if i forwarded on the cheque.

I replied (with a cheque) stating that I didnt think it was fair that the others were not covered by the DPA and refered them to the durant case.

After that I recieved a shi**t letter back from the DPA manager, (Peter Townsend) which quashed the Durant vs FSA case and said they would send the statements from June 2004.

I have now recieved my statements from June 2004 and THEY RETURNED MY CHEQUE!!! after all that fuss!

I have calculated a mere £80 on those statements as they do not cover my time at Uni, but I may just put in a claim for that, as I cant afford to get the other statements at the moment.

 

Thanks for your support and I will keep you updated.

Sorry to Dave for the spelling mistakes but im in a rush. lol :p

 

Will keep you updated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I replied (with a cheque) stating that I didnt think it was fair that the others were not covered by the DPA and refered them to the durant case.

After that I recieved a shi**t letter back from the DPA manager, (Peter Townsend) which quashed the Durant vs FSA case and said they would send the statements from June 2004.

 

This is the problem when you allow the bank to knock you off track. They have to provide you with the information you requested.

 

I would suggest you send a letter based on the original DPA letter from the library - keep as closely to the wording as you possibly can.

 

State that your DPA request started from the date that they received your cheque (insert that date if you can) and that you expect the information requested to be sent within 40-days of that date.

 

Add the following paragraph at the end:

 

I note that you have chosen to return my payment - please be aware that this does not absolve you of your responsibility to carry out this information request.

 

Should there be any further attempts to delay compliance, I will be left with no alternative but to escalate this matter into an official complaint to the Information Commissioner and/or the County Court under s.7 and/or s.13 Data Protection Act

 

Please keep us informed of progress.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the problem when you allow the bank to knock you off track. They have to provide you with the information you requested.

 

I would suggest you send a letter based on the original DPA letter from the library - keep as closely to the wording as you possibly can.

 

State that your DPA request started from the date that they received your cheque (insert that date if you can) and that you expect the information requested to be sent within 40-days of that date.

 

Add the following paragraph at the end:

 

I note that you have chosen to return my payment - please be aware that this does not absolve you of your responsibility to carry out this information request.

 

Should there be any further attempts to delay compliance, I will be left with no alternative but to escalate this matter into an official complaint to the Information Commissioner and/or the County Court under s.7 and/or s.13 Data Protection Act

 

Please keep us informed of progress.

 

I have contacted the ICO and they are saying Barclaycard are right in saying that I cant get it via the DPA. I also recieved a letter with all the information explaining why and they seem to be right :s

Link to post
Share on other sites

My first DPA letter was the one from the library, starting:

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my bank account since it was opened. Alternatively a complete set of bank statements for that period will be acceptable.

I have only had the account for about 3 years.

I then recieved the standard reply including:

I am obliged to advise only copy statements covering a maximum period from June 2004 to date will be provided.....statements are stored on Microfiche and do not fall within the subject access proivisions.

I then replied with my cheque stating (as advised in the FAQ's):

I am confused as to why the content of the statements prior to June 2004 are not covered by the Data Protection Act. As I understand it, provided the information in question can be linked to an identifiable individual the following are examples of personal data:

 

+ information about the medical history of an individual;

+ an individual's salary details;

+ information concerning an individual’s tax liabilities;

+ information comprising an individual’s bank statements; and

+ information about individual’s spending preferences

I would like to draw your attention to the case of Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] where Lord Justices Auld, Mummery and Buxton ruled that Bank Statement information, though not the statements themselves, is personal information and thus covered under the Data Protection Act.

I then got the reply:

A computerised method of stored was intorduced during May2004 with records prior to this time remaining stored by chronological order on microfilm. In Durant Vs FSA it was clearly established that manually stored records did not fall within the DP regime unless such records are stored in a very highly structured filing system.....in regard to your comment that we must provide copies of your statement that under the DPA we must provide copies of documents on microfiche the Bank is not able to comply with this demand.

He then goes on to say that this was enforced with the Durant vs FSA and only documents (when manual) which are stored in a system 'broadly equivilent to computerised systems in providing readily accessibility to the relevant information......Moreover, the effort and time involved to obtain copies of the statements for the period requested would in any event be dispropotionate under the DPA

Any ideas?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, tricky one!

 

Could you possibly see if anyone from this board has successfully got their six years bank statements/info back from Barclaycard and use that as proof that it can obviously be done? Not sure what the wording would be, but I am sure someone with a better understanding of the law surrounding this could help.

Don't forget to contribute to the CAG. Without them we would probably still be drafting our prelim letters.

OH Cap One - £436/ So far received £40. MCOL submitted 17/7/06. Caved 4/8/06 for full amount!!!

OH Monument - £140, claim filed 8th May. Requested judgement by default, settled in full 4th July via out of court settlement (see thread). Total £192ish received.

Me Barclays - £630. Received letter 13th May offering £300 full and final (they can bog off). Claim filed 16th May. Acknowledgement of Service filed 22nd May to defend all of the claim. Allocation Questionnaire completed and Stay been ordered by Judge on 18/7/06!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6583 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...