Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There are example threads where AOS is done but defences are submitted late, it happens, sometimes because MCOL is broken! As the claimant you will be able to reference a late filing and request it be struck out for not following Court Directions, for example if the defendant arrived at court with it on the day without submitting... but I believe there is some (slight) wriggle room for defendants (reasons depending) on late defence. I believe you just need to continue your claim, no defence and not following court directions will almost certainly strengthen your case
    • I'm afraid it's against site rules to recommend lawyers. You could look on the Law Society's Find a Solicitor page for local firms with the right expertise, or google nwnf lawyers in the uk, then check out reviews on social media, review websites and so on, to see how other people rate them. 403 - The Law Society SOLICITORS.LAWSOCIETY.ORG.UK HB
    • Thanks for that information. I seem to think they have similar names and similar addresses and I thought it was Aldi that was offering the great deal that attracted you to that car park. So we are still stuck with Nexus. Please do not call DCBL about a settlement figure.The first reason is that they have your telephone number which is not something you want to give to those vultures as you rightly call them. They will then harass you on the phone and try and send you last minute details the day before the case -which they shouldn't do. And second they are already charging you £60 to £70 more than they should lawfully, to that they will then add the Court costs that they haven't yet paid or incurred and then say that they will give you this great offer of £150 to avoid going to court.Big deal-not. Were it around £50 that would be a better deal but they would not accept that.   
    • Hugo, how are you getting on? the deadlines can creep up on you. It's useful to have a week or two in drafting a defence, so you can understand it for yourself before submitting. Read other like threads for examples and tailor to suit you. Get one drafted and posted (without personal info) and let us take a look
    • OK thx jk2054 I'll go that route, does anybody have any positive reviews of NWNF law firms they've had experience with? I did consider InjuryLawyers4u, but apparently they're more of a broker, & who you end up dealing with can be hit & miss.  Would rather try & get a sharp firm that are on-top of things if possible.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ajs444 v Barclaycard ***WON - Settlement agreed***


ajs444
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4674 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Noted.

 

Just have to see now if they agree to refund charges beyond 6 years. They normally refuse, leaving court action as the only option.

 

Let us know. :-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well they have credited my account with £1115.85 and have asked me to supply older statements so they can review the charges on them.

So a victory just now with maybe more to come.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you accept the offer now, this means your outstanding claim will consist purely of charges over 6 years old and compound interest thereon.

 

Your court claim would have a better chance if it includes older AND more current charges.

 

BC HAVE the data for older charges - they are checking to see if you have it too.

 

I think you should decide whether to :-

 

1. Just accept what they've offered now, and hope they will repay the older chgs when you show you have the data.

 

2. Reject their offer.

 

Tell them to take back the refund or, if they fail to, you accept it only as a payment on account of the total claimed.

 

Send them an updated spready and give them 14 days to refund the balance.

 

Confirm that you know they have access to the data about older charges and, if they don't refund within the 14 days, you'll file a court claim without further warning.

 

We know they have access to the older data from users who have pressed for it with court action. It is held in at least 2 forms of retrievable data. It may not be held as copy statements but they most certainly have full data about the date and amount of default charges.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick, I know what you are saying, but after seeing what happened to Still_surviving with Capital One and his loss over claiming past 6 years, I am looking at anything further as being a bonus.

I am just wondering how long it will be before the other CC companies latch on to what has happened.

I have a case running with Capone also which is at LBA stage, Barclaycard did not need that level of threat.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi AJS,

 

SS's defeat by CapOne was just one case. They got lucky with the judge deciding that the charges over 6 years were Statute Barred. The case does NOT set any precedent.

 

BC have, so far, shown very little desire to take any case into court.

 

I suggest you write to them with evidence of the 2004 charges saying you seek payment of the extra approx £400 in charges and int't.

 

You can add that you know BC have access to data for 2004 and earlier in various forms, BUT you are willing to settle if they refund the £400 on top of the £1,115.85. This will avoid you both spending further time and costs by taking the claim to court.

 

How does that sound.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Getting earlier statements photocopied just now and will send them back with covering letter.

 

Capital One are taking up most of my time just now having just issued an LBA against them going back six years initially.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well final response from Barclaycard today.

 

Not paying out any further than 6 years, so i can go and sing for it, they state:-

 

The charges applied to your account before April 2005 are not recoverable. They are time barred under the Limitation Act 1980, as over 6 years have elapsed from the cause of action. You claim however, that you are entitled to recovery of these charges as you have received statements from Barclaycard for that period.

 

End of message, will just have to be happy with the £1000+ that I got back.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now it's up to you:-

 

1. Accept what they say and what they offer, then move on.

 

2. You've already sent them a LBA and we know they had access to the data re older charges. So file your Claim at your local County Court. There's no point in arguing with them further. Your actions will say all you need for now.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have decided just to accept the £1000+ that they paid into my account, has taken a sizeable chunk off the balance, so a kind of victory.

 

Anyway onwards and upwards, Capone next.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ajs,

 

Most definitely a VICTORY and Big Congrats to you. :whoo:

 

Thread title changed to reflect your win.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...