Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant as an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
    • I am heading over to hers tomorrow so I will find out.  Will there be something written in the agreement or does it depend on the agreement its self ? Just so I know what to look for, so I can provide as much information as possible on here. 
    • The answer to this is going to depend on what the agreement your friend signed says. Or contact the housing provider and ask them.  
    • Thank you all for the responses, to answers a few questions  - she has had the car since Jan 23 on a 5 year term.  - She is unsure what the agreement is called, but at the end she has the option to make a payment to "buy" the car - she recieves benefits for her young children alongside the ssp (normally she would be on NLW for a 16 hr a week job)  - Yes she would like to keep the car  She has not responded to the last email from them asking her to call and it'll be followed up in an email. I told her to hold off until atleast Wednesday so I can read a few posts on here and get some more information.  I will ensure she follows up with a letter, that has not been signed but instead her name written.   Thank you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Offering Short Settlments


Major Player
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5184 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All, I have seen a number if posts that are considering offering short settlements to Welcome so thought I would start a thread to let you know what they will look at when seeing if they will accept an offer.

 

First of all, offers need to have some "Science" behind them, the way they look at offers in general is that they look at how much cash you have borrowed, what you r balance is, how many charges have been applied and then deduct off the payments you have made;

 

Worked simplisitic example is if you borrowed £12k over 5 years, your balance is £15k, you are 2 years in and have paid back £6k worth of payments and have been charged £1k then an offer of £10k would probably be accepted.

 

Therefore when offering a short settlement, make sure that you let them know how much you have already paid back when making the offer.

 

If its a secured loan - specify that you want the debt settled and the charge removed (I always find that if you say that the first mortgage company is going to repossess they look at offers more favourabley). They add a bit more analysis by seeing how much your house is worth, how much you owe the first mortgage company and if there is enough equity left in the property to settle off Welcome in full they would be UNLIKELY to accept the short settlement - Their little minds think that they will be settled in full if you sell the house or get repossessed (Nice ey!)

 

If its unsecured then basically do as has been recommended and say that payments are unaffordable (Don't give them info on this or agree to reduce payments but DO make sure that the loan is shown as settled off on your credit file).

 

Hp short settlements are trickier, I would treat them as unsecured but say the car is now worthless - It costs Welcome about £300 to collect a car so offer to drop it off to the local branch to get this reduction too..

 

Finally depending where your agreement is in the Welcome network. their may be advantages to take of their desperation of accepting the offer.

 

If you are in no arrears or very few, offer 50% or less of the calculated figure. (Operational branches, LMBs)

 

If you are in a high level of arrears, offer 25% of the calculated figure(Local colections unit, special collections units).

 

Hope this helps, any questions feel free to ask!:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that :)

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't get Welcome to move from 35% off and that's despite them having no agreement and admitting they have no agreement.

 

Borrowed £2,000 - repaid £3,900. Welcome still insist I owe an additional £1,100. They will take 35% off as a 'short settlement' but that's it.

 

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the account is in dispute right ? and you have sent the dispute letter ? . so now sit back and dont pay anything. everytime they write to you either ignore or reply with your proposed offer starting "As this account is in official dispute and has been since xxxxxx I offer you a full and final offer of xxxx"

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't placed the account officially in dispute. I just tell the guy that phones every month that I'm still waiting on Compliance sorting out the agreement. I did make an offer in writing 3 or 4 months ago of around 30% of the alleged balance. They didn't respond in writing but the guy on the phone said they would be looking for 65/75%. So that's kind of where we are at present.

 

I need to start playing hardball. :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you do Ted, no more phone conversations is a good start. do everything in writing. make your offer in writing and also send this letter.

 

Welcome financial services

Compliance Department

Ruddington fields business park

Ruddington

Nottingham

NG11 6NZ

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

DO NOT IGNORE THIS LETTER - LITIGATION ADVICE

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx , the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On the **DATE** I wrote to you requesting a copy of the credit agreement and other information under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79).

 

On **DATE** a member of your staff signed for delivery of my written request and I have an electronic proof of delivery showing their signature and the date.

 

To date you have failed to comply with these requests in any way, whether by confirmation of receipt of the request or by supplying the requested documents.

 

These documents I requested should be readily available as proof of your legal right to collect this account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

In my letter of the **DATE** I made a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above account under section 77(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore, you are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation.

 

This period has expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

You have failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, failed to send a full statement of the account and failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

You may not pass the account to a third party.

You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit. You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

Despite my letter regarding ANY communication from your company, which stated that I require ALL communications in writing, your telephone calls continue.

 

This behaviour constitutes harassment; the letters stated quite clearly to you that I require ALL communications in writing for future use. Do not telephone me again - remove any telephone numbers you hold for me from your systems.

 

Your telephone calls are in breach of the Office of Fair Trading guidelines. If you continue with them after the receipt of this letter an official complaint, together with a log recording the times and frequency of the calls will be passed both to that office and to the Trading Standards office. For your information note that ALL telephone calls are taped.

 

This type of debt collection method is contrary to the ‘Administration of Justice Act 1970’ in that it is intended to cause alarm and distress to the recipient. Your methods will not be tolerated. A formal complaint, containing copies of all correspondence including yours, has now been submitted to the relevant authorities. This will be relevant to questions of your fitness to hold a licence under the Consumer Credit Act, whether or not it results in a prosecution.

 

Take further note that continued telephone calls after the receipt of a request not to call may constitute a criminal offence under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003.

 

Communicate in writing and ONLY in writing, your telephone calls will NOT be answered.

 

HOWEVER, CALLS WILL TRIGGER COMPLAINTS TO THE REGULATORY BODIES.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Print name do not sign & Edit to suit.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FINAL SETTLEMENT OFFER.

 

 

Let it go somthing like this......

 

WELCOME FINANCIAL SERVICE

COMPLIANCE

RUDDINGTON FIELD BUSINESS PARK

RUDDINGTON

NOTTINGHAM

NG11 6NZ

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT OFFER

 

Re: 4563210025897412

 

We write with reference to the money which you are claiming on the above account that is now in official dispute.

 

As a gesture of my goodwill I wish to offer xxxxxx as an ex−gratia payment in full and final settlement of the account. This offer is made on the clear understanding that, if accepted, neither you nor any associate company will take any other action to enforce or pursue this debt in any way whatsoever and that we will be released for any liability.

 

We also request that, if accepted, you will make an entry on a credit reference agency file relating to the above account as "satisfied" in full.

 

Payment can be made within 14 days of receiving your written agreement of this offer and method of payment.

 

We look forward to receiving your reply within 14 days of this letter.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

send recorded delivery.

__________________

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ozzy, thanks very much for this. I'm going to send this today.

 

I wonder if you could advise me on something, though?

 

I currently have a PPI claim with Welcome on this account. They've came to a figure of £XXX but are offering only half of this as a refund claiming a rebate was already applied to the account - although they do not have an agreement to support this. :confused:

 

Is it possible for me to simultaneously claim PPI refund and place account in dispute? Or should I abandon the claim and simply dispute the account?

 

I just wonder if I'm leaving myself open with the PPI claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okies Ted this is going a little deep lol, so best to open your own thread so we can follow your progress and not hijack Majors thread. but to answer your question your account being placed in dispute and my letters do NOT affect your PPI claim and you can continue this claim as per norm.

 

As for the rebate being applied to the account, to be honest they probably have on a rewrite so could be true but do not take their word for it. send them a SAR with the fee of 10 pounds (knock the 10 pounds of your settlement figure lol) this gives them 40 days to send all your statements and info etc showing the rebate.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D Fair enough, Ozzy. I'd just reply by saying that I've already done the SAR to Welcome. The rewrite balance started at higher than the original loan repayable balance and there is no mention of any PPI rebate. Nor is there is any of the statements. Nor is there any rewrite agreement detailing the precise amount of PPI rebate.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't get Welcome to move from 35% off and that's despite them having no agreement and admitting they have no agreement.

 

Borrowed £2,000 - repaid £3,900. Welcome still insist I owe an additional £1,100. They will take 35% off as a 'short settlement' but that's it.

 

Any advice?

 

Sorry and your compaining because...? I owe welcome £14k and they won't take off a single penny for me. I'd be in heaven if I could get 35% off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry and your compaining because...? I owe welcome £14k and they won't take off a single penny for me. I'd be in heaven if I could get 35% off!

 

I'm 'complaining' because I've paid nearly double what I borrowed, I dispute the balance, they can't produce an agreement and are being vague as to the PPI amounts. In those circumstances, they do not appear to have much leverage but are acting as though they do.

 

I'm sorry for your own situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pcoventry - have you missed any payments on your loan - im assuming not.

 

As soon as you do you would then be eligible for a reduction (obviously i wouldnt reccommend doing this but its just the stupid way welcome work, the more payments you miss the larger the reduction you get.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...