Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • But when you perform your Stat Dec the earlier convictions will be expunged (as if they had never happened) and the sentences handed down for them are revoked. Any convictions and sentences which follow after that will occur on whatever date they are handed down and so can be appealed up to 21 days after that date.. There is simply no need for an appeal against them to be lodged at this stage. If nothing else, you do not know what you will be convicted of.   If that has what he's told you I believe he is misleading you. Magistrates are not simply waiting in court for people to turn up to make SDs. As I said earlier, most courts provide appointment dates specifically for Stat Decs and, in the areas I know about it is unusual at present to get a date shorter than three or four weeks hence. Then you really need to speak to the solicitor to find out exactly what the hearing he has arranged is for, because until you perform your stat dec your current convictions remain and the charges cannot be put to you again (so providing you with the opportunity to offer the "deal").. This is really such a straightforward matter and I don't know why the solicitor is making it appear far more complex than it is. I would never suggest you ignore his advice, but you really need to find out and understand what his advice is seeking to achieve and how it will achieve it.  
    • Thanks, FTMDave; I appreciate you looking into this. I'm going to draft an email to the new CEO, [email protected]. Looney got thrown out for not declaring "relationships in the workplace." 🍆 😉
    • Well, a letter of claim has arrived as predicted. Will be following dx100uk post and use your PAP reply form instead of the one they have sent. I have a couple of questions, do I send the CCA request to Cabot or to Mortimer Clarke? What should I state as the reason? I dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation.  
    • You pushed me to look at all our MET cases going back till June 2014.  That's 10 years so at that point I got sick & stopped! MET have never, ever taken a Cagger as far as a court hearing in all that time. As scribbled above, they have issued court papers a few times but have always bottled before the hearing. In one exceptional case the motorist didn't even have to defend - the judge chucked out the case due to rubbish Particulars of Claim. Sadly in two cases MET got a judgment because the motorist didn't file a defence to the claim.  But in one of the cases MET still didn't get their money as the person said he was elderly, didn't need credit and would rather put up with a CCJ than pay MET! So that's who you're dealing with - paper tigers.  They do court in maybe 5% of cases but even then bottle before it gets to a hearing. Anyway, let's see what writing to BP produces.
    • Any update here? MET started a court case recently against a Cagger concerning this very site and EV charging - and then bottled it and discontinued the case before the hearing. It would be useful for others to know what happened in your case.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells - and Provident!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5163 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband received a letter from Provident today.

 

It would seem that Lowells have instructed them to collect an old debt (which is with HSBC and been in dispute for several years now).

 

Since when did Provident become a debt collection agency?

 

The embarrassing part of this is we have had a couple of loans (one very recent) from Provident, which are paid on time, every time - never missed a payment and we have become friends with the collector.

 

Provident are saying they are going to send an agent (probably our friend) to arrange the terms of repayment.

 

To say we are furious with Lowells is an understatement and the chances are now, no matter what, we will never use Provident again. Think we'd rather do without.

 

Not really seeking advice on this, just putting this up as a warning to others.

 

Suffice to say, we will not be taking up Lowells/Provident's offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Leeds Losers are not the only company that is enlisting the help of Provident, Mucky Hall have also dumped a lot of their smaller amount debts on to them.

 

I have heard from others that they will try to get you to sign a new agreement, so you then legally owe provident and not Clownells.

 

Expect a letter from C K Edrupt Solicitors threatening court action, that seems to be the patten they are following.

 

They are not satisfied with fleecing its customers with 272.2% interest, they want to fleece you on behalf of someoone else now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please please please, ensure you make a formal complaint about Lowlifes to the OFT, & TS via consumer direct, one more complaint about this laughable outfit will hopefully bring it's demise very soon...then again, who would we bait then?

Consumer Direct

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way the letter from Provi is worded, is almost like Lowells is doing us a favour - complete with "discount" e.g. £500 becomes £400 and, whoop-de-do no interest !!! :lol:

 

(ROFLMFAO)

 

But, the way I see it, Lowells are arranging a loan, on our behalf, without consulting us, to cover the "debt". Surely this is illegal? :x

 

Data Protection springs to mind here among other things.

 

Think I'm going to be busy Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. Here is the letter we got yesterday. Never done this before and can't seem to get the image to a readable size :(

 

 

img001.jpg

Edited by Moonrose
Oops. Accidentally deleted the letter. Sorry.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally against OFT guidelines Debt collection guidance - Final guidance on unfair business practices - oft664 http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

Physical/psychological harassment

 

Page 9

2.6 b.

 

pressurising debtors to sell property, to raise funds by further

borrowing or to extend their borrowing

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, what Lowell's is doing is illegal and also Provident.

 

I also wonder what, if any, offence might there be under the Data Protection Act?

 

We are about to kick up merry hell with the OFT, TS and anyone else willing to listen.

 

National newspapers spring to mind :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unforunately nothing they do appears to be Illegal, just that they decide to completely ignot the OFT Debt collection Guidelines, aswell as the Admin of Justice Act, the Telecommunications ACt and the Protection from Harassment Act.

 

Quite simply the reason that all these irritating companies continue to do what they do is that they have never been brought to book over their actions.

 

The sooner the majority of their victims do so, then the sooner they will either be closed down or begin to act within the law and guidelines.

 

The only way this can be brought about is for everyone who is subjected to their very questionable practices, to complain to everyone, including MP's.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had my friend on the phone. She's getting hassle from Lowlife too - they wrote to her saying they are going to arrest her wages over some debt from a couple of years ago - they don't have a CCJ or anything like that.

 

She hasn't yet learned what they can and can't do and trying to get through to her that they can't do things like this willy-nilly took a bit of persuasion :rolleyes:

 

Unfortunately, she's not on the internet so can't read for herself all the good advice on this site (including the Cheekiness thread).

 

I've told her to report them to the OFT too as the more people report them, hopefully, eventually they'll get their operating licence revoked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of Trading styles listed on Provident Personal Credit Ltd's licence - CCL No 146091 - which does have debt collecting on it.

 

Central Collections Unit Express Debt Collecting Services

 

Never actually heard of them doing 3rd party collections before - they must be feeling the pinch.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can only do Provident harm.

 

On the front of their payment books, it states "Provident - The Name You Can Trust".

 

Not if they're going to sell their customers (many of who have probably far worse debts than we've got) down the river to parasites like Lowells.

 

It is a complete betrayal of trust, which will impact especially on the agent and the customer and ultimately lose them customers of long-standing.

 

As for the debt in question, it was in dispute. Lowells is about the 8th or 9th DCA to get the debt - and yes, we've had two, sometimes three DCAs writing about the same debt at the same time in the past.

 

I've been chewing over in my mind how I'm going to tackle this when our agent comes up next week -IF she brings the subject up.

 

I will simply tell her not to say another word about it as the matter will be going to litigation (I'd prefer to keep her out of it - I'll just tell her I may be willing to talk to another agent, but not to her as we have become friends and it would put her in an untenable position, reason being I will record any conversation with any other agent and use it in Court if need be).

 

Provident would be licenced as a debt collector - for those who have defaulted on Provident loans.

 

What's angered me is Lowells has taken the LIBERTY of "arranging" a loan for my husband with Provident without so much as a by-your-leave to us. Just sign on the dotted line. I wonder how many people, who don't know about this site have just got themselves in deeper debt because of this underhand tactic.

 

I'm afraid Lowells is going to have to sing for their supper. They get not one penny out of us - and - I will clear the existing loan with Provident asap and they will never get any trade from us again.

 

They haven't lost one customer. They've just lost three.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this needs bringing to the attention of the gutter press, they are always on the look out for something like this to get their teeth in to, it sells papers. The more publicilty the better, I am going to get on to our local radio station on Monday, they have a money problem programme in the mornings, they are going to love this. I am very well know by my local MP also, and will be bringing this to his attention as well.

 

Lets make provident wish they had never cooked up a deal with the likes of Clownells and Muckies/

 

I know they offer a service to those who cannot find credit elsewhere (at a price). But that is for the customers own needs, not to pay some lowlife DCA for something they know is unenforceable or they would not be enlisting the likes of Provident.

 

I hate Clownells anyway, but this has got going, I am going to cause Provident big headaches on this one.

Edited by alfwithhair
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please ensure this is brought to the attention of the OFT and Trading Standards, a very clear two fingered salute to the OFT by a very shady couple of companies!

 

Let your MP know about this also, this is along the lines of Loan Sharks, and yes, Lowlifes should not have passed your details onto Provident, again they have no right, implied or otherwise to be giving them your personal and financial info, so a Complaint to the ICO, and a word in Lowlifes Data Protection managers ear is also needed.

 

BBC Watchdog, would love to hear about Lowlifes new tricks, not content with fabricating alleged mobile phone debts last year, they are now passing on alleged debtors personal details to other reputably questionable organisations.

 

You should file formal complaints to both of these companies.

And I would be taking them to the bank to pay me for their antics!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure its 146091 ?

On a search I got this for that number;

 

 

Application / Licence Details

 

 

 

Licence Number:0146091

Licence Status:Terminated (Licence) on unknown date

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Name Mr Antony Lehmann

 

Categories:

 

Credit brokerage Debt adjusting/counselling

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:Yes

 

 

Issued Date: 16-Sep-1983

 

 

Legal Formation:

 

Sole Trader

 

Current Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress CorrespondenceLegal & General Kingswood Hse, Kingswood, Tadworth, Surrey, KT20 6EU Principal Place Of BusinessCaradoc House, New Farm Lane, Nuthall, Nottingham, NG16 1DY

 

Historic Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress Principal Place Of Business34, Thickett Drive, Maltby, South Yorks, S66 7LB

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

146091 is not their CCL No its their Company Number

 

 

Heres their CC Licence details.;

 

 

Application / Licence Details

 

 

 

Licence Number:0002529

Licence Status:Current

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Business NameCompany Registration Number Provident Personal Credit Limited146091

 

Categories:

 

Consumer credit Consumer hire Credit brokerage Debt adjusting/counselling Debt collecting

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:Yes

 

 

Trading Name(s) (Current):

 

Advance Cash Advance Loans C.K. Edrupt & Co. Central Collections Unit Express Debt Collecting Services Greenwood Personal Credit P. D. S. P. H. S. Home Shopping Practical Practical Credit Services Premier Financial Services (South) Premier Loans Provident Provident Direct Sales Provident Home Shopping Real Personal Finance The Hamper Club Wiseman Debt Collections

 

Trading Name(s) (Historic):

 

Edward Evans James Keir James Keir (Est 1881) Kemble Williams Warks (Lincoln) Blundells Blundells Home Shopping Gordon Higgins Greenhills Howards J & W Halliday Lawsons Sheffield Furnishing Co Simmons Tyne & Clyde Warehouses Frederick Rigby & Co Home Shopping Pooles Central Warehouse Provident Personal Credit Chirnsides Herbert Farmer Masters Reynard & Sons Samantha Page

 

Issued Date: 24-Nov-1976

Expiry Date: 18-Jan-2012

 

 

Legal Formation:

 

Body Corporate (incorporated inside UK)

 

Current Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition Charles Ernest Fred TaylorOFFICER Christopher Donald GillespieDirector Emma Gayle VersluysOFFICER Jonathan Richard GillespieDirector Michael Ashley PalmerOFFICER Mr David Robert SpiersOFFICER Mr Philip Charles KettleOFFICER Paul Richard ThrustleOFFICER Richard John Hopwood Stephen David ShawOFFICER

 

Historic Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition Anthony John HalesDirector Barrie Allan SeniorOFFICER Brian David BettsOFFICER Charles Henry GregsonDirector Christopher Andrew HerbertOFFICER Christopher Charles JohnstoneOFFICER Christopher GrahamOFFICER Dale Hayton CordingleyOFFICER David John MorganOFFICER David Wilson WoodsOFFICER Frederick Wilson ForfarOFFICER Howard James BellOFFICER John Arthur HarnettDirector John HamiltonOFFICER John Rolfe ThorntonOFFICER Leslie James StillwellOFFICER Mr Anthony John De KeyserOFFICER Mr Arthur Brian WilsonOFFICER Mr Brian Peter HoggOFFICER Mr Colin William JacksonOFFICER Mr Craig Robert Anthony Craw WatsonOFFICER Mr David ChanOFFICER Mr David George Bartaby RussellOFFICER Mr David Ralph FranksOFFICER Mr David Richard SwannOFFICER Mr G.F. WoodOFFICER Mr George Francis WoodOFFICER Mr Gerard Peter DalyOFFICER Mr Graham Michael WadesonOFFICER Mr Graig WatsonOFFICER Mr Harvey Brian LipsithOFFICER Mr Henry Goland CarpenterOFFICER Mr Ian Charles DurantOFFICER Mr James AshtonOFFICER Mr James Leishman SneddenOFFICER Mr John Broadley WalkerOFFICER Mr John LomasOFFICER Mr John Robert WilliamsOFFICER Mr Kenneth RichardsonOFFICER Mr Neville Thomas Ardern GreenwoodOFFICER Mr Paul Greame NewtonOFFICER Mr Peter Anthony VeversOFFICER Mr Peter Joseph HarperOFFICER Mr Peter Roger FryerOFFICER Mr Robert SharpOFFICER Mr Roger Stewart PawsonOFFICER Mr Ronald John ReynardOFFICER Mr Stanley Victor RandallOFFICER Mr William Leonard YerbyOFFICER Mr William MartindaleOFFICER Ms Lynne Mary NichollsOFFICER Neville Thomas Arden GreenwoodOFFICER Peter Stuart CrookOFFICER Peter William BrethertonOFFICER Raymond Reginald MilesDirector Richard Stephen HeelsOFFICER Robin James AshtonOFFICER Rosamond Joy Marshall SmithOFFICER Stephen Raymond FordOFFICER

 

Nature of Business:

 

Mortgages

 

Current Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress CorrespondenceColonnade, Sunbridge Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD1 2LQ Principal Place Of BusinessColonnade, Sunbridge Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD1 2LQ Registered OfficeColonnade, Sunbridge Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD1 2LQ

 

Historic Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress CorrespondenceColonnade, Sunbridge Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD1 2LQ CorrespondenceMrs R J Marshall Smith, Provident Financial plc, Colonade Sunbridge Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD1 2LQ CorrespondenceMrs R J Marshall Smith, Provident Financial plc, Colonnade Sunbridge Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD1 2LQ Principal Place Of Business10, James Morrison Street, Glasgow, G1 5PE Principal Place Of Business124, Stamford Street, Ashton Under Lyne, Greater Manchester, OL6 6AD Principal Place Of Business124, Stamford Street, Ashton-under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, OL6 6AD Principal Place Of Business2/26, Somerford Grove, London, N16 7TY Principal Place Of BusinessColonnade, Sunbridge Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD1 2LQ Registered Office1255, High Road, Whetstone, London, N20 0EJ Registered Office3a, High St, Rickmansworth, Herts, WD3 1HP Registered Office84-89, Southampton Road, EastLeigh , Hampshire, SO5 5ZF Registered OfficeColonnade, Sunbridge Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD1 2LQ Registered OfficeMarble Arch House 66/68, Seymour Street, London, W1H 5

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

C.K. Edrupt & Co.-This one known to CAG

 

As is Wisemans.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

C.K. Edrupt & Co.-This one known to CAG

 

As is Wisemans.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you people worry. We intend to stir up a hornets nest with this any way we can :mad:

 

Time Lowlifes were put in their place.

 

As for Provident, maybe they are feeling the pinch like the rest of us, but if they cut their interest rates they might find they'd get more customers.

 

Going into cahoots with Lowlife can only seriously damage their business. I can't believe they've been that stupid :rolleyes::|

 

Obviously going to the OFT and TS is the first point of call and a complaint to the Data Protection manager of Lowlifes. Is there a letter template I can use for this, and if so, where do I find it.

 

Any other means of nailing this lots @rses to the wall would be VERY greatly appreciated - and anyone who wants to help us stir up the hornets nest is more than welcome :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had one of these this weekend - only thing is that for me it's now statute barredlink8.gif and they will be the 10th 'DCAlink8.gif' to try and collect.

 

Blimey, I've got one thats been to 7 DCA's and I thought that was going some.

 

Must admit, by the time a debts been to two or three I don't take them seriously anymore.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...