Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Buchanan clark wells - ccj help - **CLAIM DISCONTINUED**


cosalt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi caggers

 

Got a letter from Buchanan today saying 'POST -LEGAL NOTIFICATION' Saying they believe from their client ( CL finance ) that they have successfully undertaken litigation against me, and are now authorised to add interest to the outstanding county court judgement.

 

This relates to a Dorothy Perkins card that they have never sent a CCA for following our request. We have recieved threatograms from CL & howard cohen but have just ignored them.

 

Do I assume this is just another threatogram as we have not received anything from them (or the court ) in relation to this so cant see how they could have got a CCJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Someone else who is more in the know than I will surely be along to advise you... but I always thought that unless they got the judgment via an old address then you would have received notification of legal action so that you could file a defence...

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Not an expert so wait for one to come along but...

 

On their letter is there any kind of reference to the judgment, even a date?

 

(You don't need to put any details up here just yet but just answer the query).

 

Use these guys;

 

CCJs, court orders & fines - Search yourself and others - Trust Online

 

to find out if there is anything against you.

 

If it was recent I guess it is possible they haven't got it listed. I think you have 30 days to pay a CCJ before it hits the CRA's in which case they would not find it but don't quote me on that.

 

I would agree with MorganaNK. If you haven't moved since taking out the agreement they would serve you at your current address and you would have several letters from the court during the process.

 

Could you confirm whether you have moved since taking out the DP agreement and if so, have you had any correspondence from DP at your new address?

 

I personally prefer to ignore DCA's if at all possible so as to deny them the pleasure of provoking a response. However, if you are worried about it you could write to them and ask them for full details of the judgment against you.

 

Wait for some other CAGers to post as they will possibly have some better advice/direct experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

Do you have good proof you sent the CCA request?

 

In the event you do have a CCJ that might help to get it set aside as they would have been taking enforcement action before providing you with a copy of your agreement.

 

(Probably getting ahead of the script actually but just thought of it!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just to clarify we have moved since taking out the agreement, however they have corresponded to us at the new address.

 

I have checked the register and there is no ccj registered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you check both addresses? Just in case!

 

If they have won a CCJ by default, by sending the court papers to your old address then this alone will be enough to have the CCJ set aside.

 

As previously said, scan and post it up here so others can have a look.

In the mean time, send a copy of it along with your complaint to the OFT, TS via consumer direct, check you credit file also if that is of importance to you, and see what they have left on there, if anything?

 

If as suspected, they don't have any CCJ, then I would seriously be considering proper legal advice and taking them to court and suing them for damages.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I have looked back through previous correspondance and there is a letter from Howard Cohen in October saying I should now have received my County Court Claim and gives a Northampton 9XYxxxxx number.

 

At the time we just ignored it assuming if it was for real we would receive something through from the court and we could obviously then defend.

 

Is there any way we can phone Northampton to check if this reference is real? I have looked and can't find any contact number for them.

 

As I said before there is nothing registered against us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, have found the court number, have phoned them and the court say it is a real case number and it was served to our old address in July 09 :eek:

 

What do we do now ? They never sent a CCA, and we have obviously never had any court papers.

 

I have now also found a letter saying they (howard cohen) have 'Today submitted a county court claim' dated 12th October 2009 to our correct address which we again ignored ( stupidly ) assuming it was a threatogram.

 

Again nothing registered on the CCJ register.

 

Any help appreciated !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks Ida, could really do with some help as to what to do now, the court says we can fill in a form to defend but as I have never seen any paperwork I am not sure what I am defending?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as advised above you need to apply for the ccj to be set aside so it puts you back to the postion of defending the claim

 

(i am in ecosse so may have some details wrong but someone will correct me)

 

it costs £75 unless you are exempt due to certain benefits

 

you need to file a n244

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 12 How To Set Aside A Judgment In The County Court

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Ida, is this the correct form to use as the court says an N9B?

 

They would not tell us if a judgement has been made against us only that the claim was submitted in july ( although we have a letter from Howard Cohen saying they submitted it on 12th October 2009 ) and there is nothing on the register.

 

Sorry to appear helpless but we have been pretty self sufficient so far with dealing with creditors following other threads on here but this has now moved on to a stage we have not been to yet.

 

Cosalt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is a n244 if a ccj already granted

 

i think a N9B is for a defense and counterclaim

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have won a CCJ by default, by sending the court papers to your old address then this alone will be enough to have the CCJ set aside

 

This is misleading. You will not have a CCJ set aside solely on the grounds that the claim was sent to the wrong address. You will also need primie facie grounds that would have enabled you to have the CCJ set aside if the claim had been sent to the correct address.

 

 

In this instance the OP does.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, not sure where to go now, don't know if the CCJ has been granted ? The court would not say ( should they ? ) there is nothing listed.

 

From what I can see the creditor has to apply for the judgement after the allowed time has passed for us to defend ? May be they have not done this yet. Don't want to contact them as they may then apply.

 

Confused :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is misleading. You will not have a CCJ set aside solely on the grounds that the claim was sent to the wrong address. You will also need primie facie grounds that would have enabled you to have the CCJ set aside if the claim had been sent to the correct address.

 

 

In this instance the OP does.

 

Thanks, but surely I have the right to defend ( even if my defence is no good ) but I have been denied this right by not receiving any paperwork.

 

They have the right address as they wrote to me at the right address telling me they were submitting a claim to the court ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no expert but, I would have thought, that interest could not be added after CCJ granted. I have a number of CCJ's and I've not had interest added to any, they just direct that the full amount be paid at once to the Claimant, after that it goes to the Court Bailiff. I have had to go back to Court and ask for variation to pay by instalments, but never had interest added.

 

I suggest that ALL your paperwork, after editing, be posted so that anyone giving advice can see where you're up to.

 

It might also be handy to know when you left the address to which the paperwork was sent, and also if, after you left the address, but before the alledged CCJ was granted, if you received any paperwork at all at your new address from the Claimant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mightyacorn, thanks for the advice.

 

There is nothing really to post up, I only have the following:-

 

1. A letter from Howard cohen saying that CL Finance have been asigned the debt from santander and they were today submitting a claim to the court

 

3. A letter from Howard Cohen dated 22nd October saying I should have received the court claim.

 

4. A letter from Buchanan Clark wells dated 7th december saying that Aktiv Kapital had bought the debt from CL finance.

 

5. A letter from Buchanan Clark Wells dated 25th January saying that litigation had been successfully undertaken against us and interest can now be added at 8% per annum to the outstanding CCJ.

 

All the above were sent to our new correct address.

The only other info we know is:

 

1. The court say a claim was submitted by CL finance in July to our old address

 

2. There is no CCJ registered against us

 

3. We have received no paperwork relating to the court claim.

 

4. We can't find out if a CCJ has ever been granted

 

 

It would appear to me that CL finance submitted the claim but took it no further, Aktiv Capital have bought the debt under the impression that a CCJ had been granted.

 

Can any one confirm that the CCJ is automatic after it has been submitted if we do not respond, or would CL finance have to apply for it ?

 

Any help appreciated

 

Cosalt

 

Any help much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...