Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Customer not paying invoice due to complaint


kirkydee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5193 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am a self employed decorator and have a customer (who I have worked for before) who text me after I completed the work for them (Friday night)to say I had done a great job but got coloured paint on their carpet. I was painting in coloured paint on the Thursday and on the Friday all I did was white gloss. I didn't get the text until the next day (Sat) but responded straight away, I tired ringing but got no answer so text back and asked if I could go round and try to remove the paint for them as it was emulsion and should come out. I then didn't hear anything until the Friday after when I got a letter saying that they were going to have the carpets cleaned and they would pay me the money owed minus the cost of cleaning the carpets and also there was coloured paint on the ceiling. The letter came the same day as the carpets were being cleaned. I responded the same day by letter to say that I would be happy to repaint the ceilings (at no cost) and I would pay for the carpet to be cleaned if they could provide me with a receipt.

I then got a text the following day saying the carpets had not come clean and there was coloured paint on the white walls as well as the ceilings. I responded by saying sorry again and that I would go round at the customers convenience to repaint walls, ceillings and discuss what to do about the carpets, I told the customer I was insured and if necessary I can claim for new carpets for them. They said they were going to contact Trading Standards and ring me today but I haven't heard anything from them.

I'm just wondering what to do next as although I have asked on 3 occaisions to go back to the house to put right whatever is wrong I have not been allowed to go back. This is making me wonder if there is a problem or if its just the customer who doesn't want to pay up. The fact that the customer text me instead of ringing me when they found the paint is unusal too. Any advice would be greatfully received.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My hubby had a similar problem when he was self employed landscaper. \You should ring Trading standards yourself they are very helpful.

 

The customer should have shown you what they considered to be wrong and given you the chance to correct it first. that is what we were told. BUT if they are still not happy they have the right to have it redone at your expense.

 

My hubby was a sole trader and unfortunately we were also told that not only could the customer have the WHOLE garden done at our expense but if anything went wrong in it we would be liable for the next 6 or 10 (can't remember which now several years ago)years so hubby had to go bankrupt!

 

Trading standards also knew of the couple who did this to us as they had done it before to a window company but the law was on their side!

 

I do hope you manage to sort it out but do get some advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought but maybe you should call their bluff and tell them you have informed your insurance company and they want to send someone round to inspect the damage. That might make them think twice.

 

 

That is a very good idea!

 

If I had found paint on the carpet, you can be damn sure that I would have checked the rest of the room for paint where it shouldn't be & not taken several days to find any fault! I would not have text either so it appears that you are being reasonable but the householder is not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou both for the advice, she does know that I was going to contact my insurance company as I told her that on Sat and they did say if I couldn't get in to look at the damage then they would send someone. I've had another text this morning saying she is waiting on Trading Standards to let her know what to do with the letter I sent last week. She also said that although I have offered to go and repaint whatever is wrong that doesn't solve the issue with her carpets. I have already said that I am insured and if I can go and see the damage I am happy to claim and pay for the carpets to be replaced. Seems like she is just fobbing me off now so I am going to give Trading Standards a call myself and see what they say. Then will write her another letter and have it sent registered post just incase!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could ask for pictures of the damage to pass as reference for your insurers, if she wont let you in.

 

They were perfectly ok to let you in prior and why was nothing mentioned before you left the house, so must be small ammount of damage, if there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have spoken to Trading Standards this afternoon and they think that she is trying to avoid paying her bill for several reasons such as she text me instead of ringing, a genuine customer would ring straight away not text the evening after. Also because I have asked to go round 3 times now and each time she comes up with another thing that I am supposed to have done wrong and does not actually say I can go and either sort the work out or look at the carpet I am meant to have spilt paint on. Anyway, they have advised me to write to her to say that under the goods and services act tradesmen should be allowed to rectify any alledged mistakes and if she does not let me do this and view the alledged damage to the carpet then I should take her to the small claims court. I have sent this today so hope that this does the trick as its really upsetting that someone could be like this! I have been self employed for 4 years and never had this before, my customers ask me back time and time again because I take such a pride in my work and love my job.

 

Midge61, really sorry to hear about what happened to your husband. Hope the couple involved have something like that happen to them one day so they know how it feels. Can't understand how some people can be so nasty!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi kirkydee

 

Glad you got some sound advise. It was a steep learning curb for us but unfortunately there are always people out theere that think they can exploit others who are just trying to earn a honest crust.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had another text from customer today saying she is going to her solicitors as she has been advised that she can claim the cost of the damage to the carpets from me. Again she is not really answering the letter I sent as I have said that if she lets me view this alledged damage then I am insured and I will make a claim...I have had a claim form from my insurers already just incase. My wife is sure that the customer will now throw paint on her carpets just to get me to pay as I left the tin of paint behind as the customer paid (well I thought she had until the cheque was stopped) for the paint. I can't and won't make a claim though just on her say so...this has been going on now for 3 weeks and I've now asked 4 times to view this paint spillage. As time goes on it convinces me more and more that she's just trying to avoid paying me as if I had a problem with someone who had provided me with a service then I'd want it sorting out asap!

 

Spoken to Trading Standards again and they have said she is being totally unreasonable and that I should carry on with taking her to the small claims court as she hasn't got any defense to stopping the cheque. She should have paid me and then persued me for any alledged damages to her carpet. Not sure what to do as this is just stressing my wife out so much, neither of us are sleeping. Don't want to let it go and then have her claim for the carpets as then I'll have lost £450 for the job and will have to pay £250 excess on my insurance policy but am wondering if this customer will ever pay up as they always seem to have an excuse for avoiding sorting out the problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

So long as you have records proving the times you have contacted the customer asking to view the damage I would do as TS have suggested.

 

Get the claim form from your local court or do it via moneyclaim online and fill them in.

 

She has no defence and as TS said she had no right stopping the cheque. It does seem as though she hasn't taken any proper advice and as though she is just trying her luck. If she HAD spoken to TS they would have told her that she should give you a chance to view the alledged damage and make good.

 

My personal opinion is she was trying it on and now doen't know how to back down.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

I decided to send the letter and just as I was in the Post Office (sending it registered!) she rang me. She said that she didn't want to have to get solicitors involved so I said that if she'd have rung me in the first place I'd have come down and looked at this 'damage' and claimed on my insurance. She said she didn't want to go through all that hassle so I said well its my insurance so if you let me look at the carpets them I'll send the claim form off I've got. She said she doesn't want new carpets and would be happy with just paying me half of what the work should have cost.

 

I'm a bit annoyed but I agreed to this as she has the paint and I wouldn't be suprised if I said no if she did put some paint on the carpet, then I would have to claim on my insurance and I'd have to pay the excess and my premiums would go up too so it would have cost me more in the long run. I also asked what was wrong with the painting I'd done as she'd said it was 'shoddy', she said well nothing really, it was my friend who told me to say that!!

 

Just wish there was somewhere that us reputable traders could log the names and addresses of these customers who try it on as I'm sure she'll do it again to someone else.

 

Thanks for your advice Midge61, its been really helpful to have an independant view from someone as haven't been able to talk to family as this person is supposed to be a friend of my brothers long term girlfriend!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

 

Glad you got it sorted. It is always horrible and stressful when you get people like this but I think it shows she was trying to pull a fast one.

 

In future I would always ask the customer to go round and inspect everything before you leave a job so that you are not leaving yourself open to this sort of thing again.

 

Trading standards keep records of these things so if she tries it again she will be known.

 

All the best

midge61

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, thought I'd got it sorted but looks like I haven't now! I'm still waiting for this customer to pay for half of what the work cost as she agreed. I've sent another invoice with 'gesture of goodwill' amount knocked off for immediate payment and got nothing. I went round to her house with the remainder of the cream paint that she asked for but she was on the phone when I got there and couldn't talk but said the cheque was in the post. Again nothing turned up, then I got a text 3 weeks ago telling me she'd been burgled and would post a cheque the following day...again I've got nothing.

 

I wrote her a letter on Monday to say she'd got 7 days to pay the half that we agreed or I would withdraw my goodwill offer and take her to court for the full amount. She's text me today to say that she put the cheque in the post at work and they haven't posted it and she's only just found out cos she's been on a course. She's now saying that my work is not up to standard so she's got a quote for a redecoration from another decorator, receipts for carpets cleaning and that if I take her to court then she will claim for redecoration, carpets cleaning and for new carpets...trouble is she's got the paint so she could make a right mess with it and say it was me that did it. She claims to have spoken to a solicitor and they've told her she'll win her case, just worried cos I can't prove that the mess she makes is her making and not mine.

 

Not sure what to do now as trading standards have advised me to go to court and when I spoke to them again today that's all they can tell me to do now.

 

Was wondering whether it might be worth sending a letter for her to sign to say that she has 14 days to pay me for the cost of half the work and if she does then I will drop my case. But she has to sign the letter to say that she will not then come back and try to claim for this alledged damage that I still haven't seen despite asking to see it 5 times now. Or should I just go to court and hope justice prevails.

 

Any advise would be gratefully received...again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send something like this;

 

NOTICE OF INTENDED COURT PROCEEDINGS

 

 

Dear Bad Payer,

 

TAKE NOTICE that according to my records the sum of £xxxx is seriously overdue for payment for invoices yyy and zzz.

 

Unless payment is made to the above address within seven days Legal Action to recover the debt will be taken against you without further notice.

 

Copies of the outstanding invoices are attached.

 

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

This kind of thing makes my blood boil...she is clearly trying it on and needs teaching a lesson. Im sorry, but I dont really have any further advice, but you have my sympathy and I wish you good luck.

 

Just one thing:

 

She's now saying that my work is not up to standard so she's got a quote for a redecoration from another decorator, receipts for carpets cleaning and that if I take her to court then she will claim for redecoration, carpets cleaning and for new carpets...

 

I am a self employed decorator and have a customer (who I have worked for before) who text me after I completed the work for them (Friday night)to say I had done a great job but got coloured paint on their carpet.

 

Do you still have the above text where she says you did a great job...could be useful to discredit her if you ever got into a courtroom as she keeps changing her mind as to whether your work is ok or not.

 

And I presume she was fine the last time you did work for her???...looks like she has a friend or two geeing her along to be awkward :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully you`ve kept the recent texts telling you the cheque is on its way.

Any court would question why she repeatedly promised payment, THEN decided to get other quotes for various work.

She`s trying it on and that should be obvious to anyone.

 

She would also have to prove that YOU did the damage. From your op, when she originally stalled for payment due to`damage`, she wouldn`t even allow you access to inspect and put right.

 

I had a customer like this once, in fact, she had my original work `allegedly `done again someone else, wanted me to pay for it..and refused to show me invoices !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice and support everyone. I've decided to just write a very simple letter to basically say what cerberusalert suggested as she can't then (hopefully) fob me off with any more questions, comments or excuses. And if she does, I'll just ignore them now as I can't keep being fobbed off. Its hard enough running a small business in this climate without people hiring you and then trying to get out of paying. My wife was made redundant last year and is still out of work so I need all the money I work hard to earn to pay our bills.

 

I have kept copies of all the texts she's sent me and all the letters I've sent her requesting payment or to look at this 'damage' and her responses by text.

 

Just out of interest poppie173, what happened with your customer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kirkydee,

In my case, I offered to pay a part of the cost ( just to get her off my back ) subject to her agreeing in writing that all the other work was ok. I also obviously wanted to see the invoice.

 

Sure enough, as soon as I sent that letter, she started raising new problems ! Bear in mind that she had already paid me, so I put the ball in her court and showed her the before and after pictures I had taken.

Fingers crossed, that was the last I heard from her and its been nearly a year.

 

I ALWAYS take before and after pictures, clients don`t mind at all as I use the pics for my presenter.

I suggest that maybe you do the same in future, just for peace of mind !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi poppy173, that was good that you'd taken photos, hopefully thats the last you'll hear from that customer. Think I will start taking photos, I've got a decent camera phone I take to work with me so could use that. Never thought of doing that before as most of my work comes from recommendations now rather than advertsing but having said that, this customer is a friend of my brothers long term girlfriend. I suppose as long as I ask their permission first and tell them that its just for my records and not a website or anything then most people won't object.

 

Thanks for the advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...