Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax CC /IQOR


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Now the situation with my halifax CC account is with A sar IS THAT I HAVE RECEIEVED LOADS Of pages from screens with several DCA's but the most interesting one is that a DCA received my CCA after the account is closed (with them)and it is of a different date from the one the bank (halifax) has sent to me ( the one halifax has sent me is also in my opinion in that it is covered in dots except for the area around and in betweeen my sig and apparently the girl from the bank) obv i cannot post it on here.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well what I'm trying to ask for is some advice as to what the best way to proceed is, I'm thinking of asking Halifax if i can view the original as I'm of the opinion that the copy they have sent to me has been doctored due to the fact that per say per square inch there is 100 little dots covering the rest of the document but suddenly if you look at the signature part of the doc there is very few dots and even in the loops of both the bank employee and my alleged signature there are no dots, when they put docs on microfiche do they actually keep the original and do they have to put the "origanal" before court or will the microfiche copy suffice?..... oh and btw I have a dodgy default notice and there was no info on default notices sent thru My S.A R. request. How far should i push this too?

 

leo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hiya,

 

 

sorry you have had any help

 

can you not scan and post the cca and default notices up here, deleting your personal info?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ida, many thanks, default notices definately dodgy ... remedy date exactly 2 weeks from date of letter not allowing time for service, but my point about CCA agreements is, and the reason why i cant scan them is the issue around my signature... It just seems wrong to me... I don't know the method halifax use to scan docs, but my signature uses a lot of loops but there appears to be no black dots or very few in these loops compared with the rest of the print in the CCA. It just looks wrong to me... do they actually have to provide the original in a court case or would this "scanned version" do? It does contain all prescribed terms however ..rate of interest credit lemit and monthly repayments.. It was from 2005. However MY SAR provided me with a load of screen savers about everytime I breathed down the phone or hung up on them( a nameless DCA) (not wanting to give out too much info) and also one which stated that the CCA halifax provided to them ( after the un-named DCA had closed the case) a date which was 6 days out from the CCA the halifax sent me....... now I find it hard to believe that a clerk or clerkess can accurately report that i breathed then hung up and then get a simple date wrong.... and record such information and then forget to send on copies of an important document like a default notice!.. I used the template from here for my SAR so the request for default notices was included but somehow not sent....many thanks for any thoughts on how to proceed from here... was over 6 weeks ago i got the results from my SAR not heard a peep from halifax IQOR which is perhaps the worst thing.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you are saying enforceable cca- but unsure of sig - dodgy default only giveing you 14 days from the date the letter was sent - have you got a termination notice?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah definatelty unsure of signature , but as everybody knows everyone's signature changes slightly overtime but another thing on application it says i was married but was not married until 7 moths after date of so callled application..... now am not going to deny that i had account with halifax but after the hassle i had and my mrs had with them and other DCA's threatening us with throwing us into the street and taking my step son's right shoe and pocket money this is the reason why we have decide to fight them... if we lose at least we'll have gone down fighting, like many other's on this site.. much respect. have defo got dodgy default notice.... have never used my scanner b4 but may figure out how to use it if nec. if they choose to ignore the law then I shall not! x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...