Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Yes Car And Charging Order ** WON **


gdk2711
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4994 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 448
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Friend of mine got car from them and his agreement is over 6yrs old

its been quiet he says but you never know.............

BRING IT ON

Edited by gdk2711
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a copy recieved from the court confirming set aside...

and now awaiting deed of release...........

GO-DEBT HAVE TO REMOVE ORDER FROM MY HOUSE BY THE 19TH OF MARCH

THE CLAIMANTS CLAIM IS DISCONTINUED

AND EACH PARTY WILL BEAR THERE OWN COSTS

DEFENDANTS COST SUBJECT TO DETAIL LEGAL AID ASSESSMENT

Edited by gdk2711
Link to post
Share on other sites

BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

GOT DEED OF RELEASE TODAY SIGNED BY WILLIAM GILL AND HOLLIS BRIGGS

SWEET SWEET SWEET............

BUT THEY MAY TRY IT ON AGAIN AND THEN THATS WHEN I HAVE THEM FOR HARRASMENT MAY GET SOME MONEY OFF THEM (LOL)

MY SOLICITOR WILL BE KEEPING THE FILE FOR 6 YRS SO LET THEM TRY AND EVEN THINK OF IT

 

WE GOT THERE THANKS FOR HELP BOYS & GIRLS

Link to post
Share on other sites

CHEERS PEEPS

I have just been on the forum. I see the letter i e-mailed to the 1 or 2 caggers has come in useful (well the wording) i will get the one i have now signed by william rhodes (deed of release) soon as....

(i will water it down)

For debt4get..........

Another one of my replys has been messed with.

By same forum guy..(the title manager has gone to his head)

i hate bullies and people who think because the have a title are better than everyone else

He is boring me now as there was nothing in it a problem.....

i have deleted it now...

If he carrys on i will send item to your mail and postggj's mail........

BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...