Jump to content


MBNA/Arrow/Marlin/Mortimer Solictors **WON**


zamtaff
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5256 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not been able to put the story on site before as in one letter received Mortimers stated that they were looking at the site. SO I HAVE PUT THIS ON THE SITE IN HOPE IT WILL HELP

 

Anyway we won in court £3800.

 

The judge was not particularly helpful and suggested that the application form from MBNA was a credit agreement even with that funny signatute in the top left hand corner. WE discussed what all 4 corners meant as not everything can be put on two sides of the paper. I asked him then were is the clause 11 of T&C refereed to on the front of the application. This was quickly move on.

 

Further,i received a NOA which had the Date of assignment 00/00/00 stated The Judge said i did not need to know the date of assignment as it was commercial sensitive. Beats me why it said the case quote was irrelevant and does not affect that the debt is assigned.

 

DN this was a one that cracked me up the original send to me which i had should a date of 22 Aug 2008 to get the arrears paid, but when i asked for disclose the DN came back with this date being 25 Aug 2008, which would provide the 14 days necessary under s87. This was the only document that was different when i brought this up with the Judge, he was well its a screen dump and the date is an automatic entry Ok but the fist DN notice must stand. We then had a discussion about case law. The case then went to only the arrears being owed. I also gave the Judge my credit file and showed him a entry by Arrow which was before the date there said they owned the debt on the POC. He said so what this is a matter for the IOC.

 

We also had Rankine thrown in.

 

At last we got to were are the statements to show how any of this debt was calculated. None could be produced in Court.

 

After a 10 min rest the judge said unenforceable. On leaving he told the Claimenants solicitor to look up case 8QC52414

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was LIP

 

The T&C were the one's of the Microfiche the Standard issue. Whta i was saying that on the front of the application form is a section "read clause 11" well no where on this form front back is a clause 11. The DJ was try to say the T&C on the microfiche were with the application form. Which we all know is not the case. He did harp on about my signature in the box and that constitutes a credit agreement. I simple asked what was the credit limit how did MBNA work out the APR when must i pay. Anyway 2 hours and 30 mins what a waste of the courts time. but it must have cost Arrow a few bob.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

yesterday 23 Dec 09 I got a letter from Arrow. They have send me

1 Copy Agreement

2 Terms and Conditions

3 Statement of account

 

The letter goes on to say " Please provide your proposal for repayment of your debt. Failure to do so will result in the continuation of collection activity, which in your case may include ligation."

 

I do not like this Arrow Global, what can we do I happy to go all the way

Link to post
Share on other sites

yesterday 23 Dec 09 I got a letter from Arrow. They have send me

1 Copy Agreement

2 Terms and Conditions

3 Statement of account

 

The letter goes on to say " Please provide your proposal for repayment of your debt. Failure to do so will result in the continuation of collection activity, which in your case may include ligation."

 

I do not like this Arrow Global, what can we do I happy to go all the way

 

Is this to do with MBNA ?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I don't have access to the quoted court case.

 

However, as the Judge has ruled the agreement unenforceable, I would point this out to Arrow and point out the issue of estoppal.

 

If they persist, tell them you will return to court to obtain a stop and desist order; with Arrow being liable for the full costs.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...