Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Friends. I cannot believe it but im being evicted again, i was given a section 48 notice 4 months into my tenancy. I already went through this process last year, i overstayed in my last place by a few months and left on 6th Oct 2023. I knew to check all the documentation that they sent to see if the notice is legal, it looks like it is. I took this place out of desperation as i had to vacate that last place. I hate this place so im not bothered about leaving it.    These cowboys lied to me when i viewed the house. I told the agent that i was evicted from my last house and naturally i dont want this to happen again. She said  the landlord has no plans to sell the house. What she did not tell me was that the landlord had tried to sell the house last year and failed. So it looks like they have used me to fill in the short period of time until its time to sell again. I did see it advertised online.   I told them im not in a strong enough financial position to find another property, cost of a deposit, 1 months rent and moving costs.   They have told me they are starting legal proceedings. They have sent me an invoice for £395 but i have not even received the court paperwork.    I dont like the job im in so i have decided to relocate to a better job and hopefully find cheaper rentals.   I can post a copy of the notice if needed.  
    • yes a judgement sorry I used the wrong word before
    • Hi So on Friday I received a copy on email from the claimants solicitors with an attached relief from sanctions application - on the basis that the solicitor missed the deadline for the additional directions and it was an oversight on their part and that the claimant should therefore not suffer.   They then attached a copy of the deed of assignment and a new witness statement.  They stated that they would be happy to delay the court date by 28 days but that they believed both parties were ready for the court case on 7th June. My first question, is there anything I need to do or do I just sit and wait to see what is decided?  Secondly, is it likely the judge will be aware that the claimants solicitors did exactly the same in the set aside court case (ie they filed their court bundle late and applied for relief from sanctions on the morning of the court date, and my solicitors had no choice but to agree because they threatened to strike my case out because my solicitors had only filed their court bundle by email and not post).  This is a clear pattern of how these solicitors work rather than it being a one off oversight! 
    • I shall find the link later this evening. It was about couples not living together but being liable for council tax. I was never married or in an official civil partnership. We lived together for 18 months, I then left for 6 months for work but continued to pay my half of the bills and rent.   We then split up I gave up my tenancy she took it all in her name. She then decided to move in with me 5 months later. She then banned me from going back to my house eventually let me back in then called the police. Took over my house and is now only paying the rent not the bills so I will be landed with those to. So over the course of our relationship I have ended up paying her debts for 5 different addresses, personal loans and credit cards. If I refuse to pay them she makes more accusations.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Attempting to recover our deposit help please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5298 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning

 

Just found this website by chance and hoping I maybe able to gain some assistance from your goodselves so here goes:-

 

Our tenancy agreement was due to fiinsh on 1st November 2009. I contact Landlord by telephone (who lives next door) to state that after 12 months at the property we would like to leave, due to excessive noise and anti-social behavoir from other properties in the block, and as shift workers (both myself and partner work for emergency services) this was becoming an issue.

 

He agreed and said he was sorry and I asked him about notice he stated 1 month was fine and this was confirmed by me by letter and posted through his door by hand.

 

we have now recieved a letter from them stating we did not give two months notice and they are withholding £950 from our deposit for 1 months rent in lieu of notice.

 

This was sent 10 days after our departure.

 

Can anyone advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say "Our tenancy agreement was due to fiinsh on 1st November 2009".

 

If you left on or before then, you don't need to give any notice at all!

 

Was your deposit protected? If it was, raise a dispute with the relevant scheme. If it wasn't, then you can use the threat of a 3x penalty for failure to protect as a negotiating position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes deposit was protected and have started the dispute process but this is our first time with this and are unsure what to expect!!!

 

Can you expand on this no notice required suggestion anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, if the landlord accepted one month's notice then that should be that. But obviously you may need to prove it, and I don't know where the burden lies. So the following assumes you cannot prove you gave notice:

 

What date did you leave the property?

 

Your contract was for 12 months. If you want, you can leave on or before 12 months as long as you pay for the 12 months. You don't have to give notice.

 

You cannot end the tenancy before the 12 months are up unless there is a break clause (which might be one, two or whatever months' notice - whatever you agree with the landlord).

 

If you did not leave until after 1st November it would have become a "statutory periodic tenancy" where to end it one rental month's notice is required by you or 2 months' notice if the landlord wants to end it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve M some really helpful information there copyed and pasted this from the "Short Term Tenancy Agreement"

 

1.6.1 The Term shall be for a definite period of twelve calendar months from and including 1st November 2008 to and including 31st October 2009.

1.6.2 If the Tenant remains in the Property beyond the end of the initial fixed term and no new fixed term

Tenancy comes into being then the Tenant will have a Statutory Periodic Tenancy by virtue of Section 5 of the Housing Act 1988.

1.6.3 The “Term” is to include any extension or continuation of the fixed term (but not a replacement tenancy for another fixed term) or as a Statutory or Contractual Periodic Tenancy.

However further on the tenancy agreement states

 

 

2.5 Tenants Break Clause

 

 

2.5.1 If the Tenant intends to vacate at the end of the fixed term he must give the Landlord at least two months notice in writing.

2.5.2 The Tenant may bring the tenancy to an end at any time (but not within six months of the commencement date) by giving the Landlord at least two months notice in writing from the rent due date stated in clause 1.7.4.

 

 

 

 

Is what you have already said still valid?

 

They are also attempting to claim for alledged damages that were already present how do we stand on that?

Edited by andycuk
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you left 31 October, then NO notice was required. If you left after then (1st Nov?) then you had to give a minimum 1 months notice ending on the last day of the month. This is called a Statutory Periodic Tenancy and overwrites any notice periods specified in your tenancy agreement. Therefore, if you left on 1st Nov you are responsible for rent until 30th November.

 

With regard to deposit deductions for damage - was an inventory carried out when you moved in, did you sign it? If the answer is no then the LL will not be able to prove that the damage wasn't there when you moved in, and as such you have nothing to worry about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that we left on the 31st October at 1500 and have a letter from the LL confirming that.

 

Sorry to be a pain but why does it overwrite what is in tenancy agreement?

 

You entered into a "Fixed Term" of 12 months (section 1.6.1 of your agreement) as such, you can not be penalised for not staying longer. At the date of signing, you agreed that you were only staying for 12 months - in effect you gave 12 months notice!

 

Having left the property on 31/10 you didn't enter into a SPT and therefore it doesn't overwrite it but section 2.5.1. is unenforceable because of what I said above.

Edited by Snorkerz
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with Snorkerz. But also you should bring the following document from the OFT on Unfair Terms in tenancy contracts to the attention of your landlord or the dispute resolution service. See 3.78:

 

"A tenant is not required to give notice to bring the tenancy to an end at the end of the fixed term... "

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/unfair_contract_terms/oft356.pdf

 

PS. This document is very useful for checking lots of other requirements in tenancy contracts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with Snorkerz. But also you should bring the following document from the OFT on Unfair Terms in tenancy contracts to the attention of your landlord or the dispute resolution service. See 3.78:

 

"A tenant is not required to give notice to bring the tenancy to an end at the end of the fixed term... "

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/unfair_contract_terms/oft356.pdf

 

PS. This document is very useful for checking lots of other requirements in tenancy contracts.

 

Useful link Steve_M. Would add for OPs benefit that this is 'guidance', not 'law' so they should be careful how they use it. ie it's fine to say "the office of fair trading say" but its dangerous to say "the law is..."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...