Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Apex


jonregular
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5021 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

My CCA is more or less the same as what everyone else has recieved recently.

 

I am waiting to see the outcome of this court case in March,apparantly it will give all of us an idea or confirmation on prescribed terms within our contracts and if they be enforceable or not!!!

 

I am watching the skies!!!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hello again,

 

Back in January 2010 Apex sent what appears to be a photocopy of my origional Egg credit aggrement 2003 & has my signature at the bottom in a little box!.

It also state under limit-"we will you from time to time the approved limit we have set and,if different,the individual limit you have chosen on the account".

They also mentioned in a seperate letter they were awaiting receipt of my statement of account.

 

On the 01/07/10 Apex sent me a statement of account for my Egg card and went on to advise me of the urgency to contact them to arrange payment of debt owed.

 

 

Can anyone advise what my next course of action would be as i would rather not be dealing with Apex to resolve this debt.

Like most other people on here would i be right in thinking to delay until PT2537's case outcome? and what can i do to delay until then?

 

 

Many thanks

cca.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again,

 

Back in January 2010 Apex sent what appears to be a photocopy of my origional Egg credit aggrement 2003 & has my signature at the bottom in a little box!.

It also state under limit-"we will you from time to time the approved limit we have set and,if different,the individual limit you have chosen on the account".

They also mentioned in a seperate letter they were awaiting receipt of my statement of account.

 

On the 01/07/10 Apex sent me a statement of account for my Egg card and went on to advise me of the urgency to contact them to arrange payment of debt owed.

 

 

Can anyone advise what my next course of action would be as i would rather not be dealing with Apex to resolve this debt.

Like most other people on here would i be right in thinking to delay until PT2537's case outcome? and what can i do to delay until then?

 

 

Many thanks

cca.jpg

 

Surely you dont have to do anything to delay, just ignore them :) Or am i missing something ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it were that simple dd,but i would prefer to be compliant to a certain point without getting myself into trouble or handing money over until every option i have open to me has been exhausted!

 

What are my next options though?

 

 

Many thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it were that simple dd,but i would prefer to be compliant to a certain point without getting myself into trouble or handing money over until every option i have open to me has been exhausted!

 

What are my next options though?

 

 

Many thanks in advance!

 

But you dont have to explore any options, (except the CCA one, which you have already done).

 

What it comes down to is Apex can't do anything untill they take legal action, now as we all know, the Egg CCA's appear unenforceable, so whether court action will be taken is doubtful.

 

P.S. Im in the same boat, I'm not going to play letter ping pong with Apex, so i just ignore them, ( I had previously obtained my CCA from Egg and it is the same as yours.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to jump in to this thread...

 

I'm in the same position as you, Andy. I've been following pt's thread for a while and am now ignoring letters from Apex. I've had three of the "debtors notice" ones with the red banner. The last one I recieved was a bit different and starts with:

 

"Further to our previous letter, your failure to discuss this account and reach a mutually acceptable arrangement now leaves us with little alternative but to commence legal action for payment of the amount owing"

 

Apparently my acccount is being processed and "may" be passed to their solicitors in 10 days time.

 

I'm still ignoring them as I can't see them taking me to court until a decision is reached in pt's case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again,

 

Have received letter from Apex asking for a payment or contact within 10 days or my account will be passed onto "PRE-LITIGATION ASSESSMENT".

 

They go on to say they will consider legal enforcement of debt against me or my property.

 

My question is,how safe is my house when a non-secured debt is owed/disputed?

 

Many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again,

 

Have received letter from Apex asking for a payment or contact within 10 days or my account will be passed onto "PRE-LITIGATION ASSESSMENT".

 

They go on to say they will consider legal enforcement of debt against me or my property.

 

My question is,how safe is my house when a non-secured debt is owed/disputed?

 

Many thanks in advance

 

Very safe.

 

Whilst it is clearly possible your home is at risk on a secured loan, on a unsecured one the risk is minimal.

 

The very worst that could happen is that in the likely event Apex did take legal action and won there is a slim possibilty they could get a charging order, this would just mean that if you sold the property they would be on the list of people who you had to pay alongside your mortgage co. etc, all of this is very very unlikely though. Its certainly not anything like a repossession order though.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would have to obtain a CCJ against you on which you would have to default before they could get a charging order. Note that to get a CO they simply need to apply to the court and they will get an interim order without anyone telling you until it's been done. These is then a hearing to determine whether the CO should be made final.

 

Once a CO is in place, most creditors will sit back and wait for you to sell the home or remortgage at which point they will step in and will be paid. Alternatively they can apply to the court for an order for sale which is very, very unlikely to be granted.

 

If you believe that the agreement is unenforceable then you must defend the court claim as strongly as you can. If a CO is put in place, you would have the devil's own job in contesting it later.

 

Having said that your letter sounds like a standard threatogram.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jon,

 

I have several of those letters. The next one will be a "DEBTORS NOTICE" (big red banner across the top) which will say pretty much the same thing. I have three or four of those too.

 

They are standard letters, and have so far not been backed up with any action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for reply Roary!

 

I would really have prefered to settle this debt with egg,as i had been on their debt management for around a year(without defaulting)before they sold mine/everyones debt on,which i though was very unfair!

nothing illegal about what they did, but would have thought fair to let me come up with a final offer that i could afford,probably more than what egg sold it to apex for!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

That was a right pain in the arse trying to find my thread!!

 

Anyway,Have received a 1st debtors notice which contains many "may's" if i dont resond in some way

as i am awaiting outcome of PT's case,what should i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello

 

Another letter recieved which states that i now have a personal case handler and that my case may still be passed on their litigation dept 10 days from date of this letter.

 

What should i do next as i am still waiting on PT's case? should i do anything at all?

 

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received any documents from them yet?

 

Hi Cerb,

 

I have recieved so far..

 

(Photo)Copy of Egg aggrement (signed)/Terms & conditions,after CCA request sent!

 

(photo)copy of statement of account

 

First Debtors notice

 

letter mentioned in previous post

 

 

I was keeping up to speed with PT's thread before the site change,can't locate it now?

 

 

Any advice would be appreciated

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's removed the thread for the time being.

 

Have you had the Egg agreement checked over?

 

No,not sure how to go about it,whether i stick it up here for someone to look over it?

 

But i think its the same as most on here with reference to the prescribed terms and other thingamjigs!!

 

I will stick it up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...