Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is it voda that's put it back up or is it a debt buyer/dca? that bought the debt.? but no it should not be showing dx  
    • Hello, Im here in regards to a vodafone account from 2015. No payments made on the said vodafone from August 2015 Default Date 12th Dec 2015 . was left sat there untill it dropped off my credit file & thought no more of it . it did eventually drop off my credit file . all done & dusted & had no need to worry about my credit file. as if Vodafone would have written i would have sent them the SB letter.   so fast foward to yesterday 13/06/24 logged in to see my credit file & Bam vodafone appears same amount , same dates only thing that is different is instead of saying default its now on there as Delinquent !!! now my understanding was once a default drops from a credit file it cant be put back on or am i wrong ? so moving forward how would i deal with this ?   any help and advice would be great thank .   BTW i know the default date as back in 2019 i printed my credit report off , on that said report that i fished out today it gives me the default date , status history & Balance history.      
    • US signs ‘Israel style’ 10-year security deal with Ukraine INEWS.CO.UK It comes after G7 nations agreed to free up $50bn from Russia's frozen assets into a revenue stream for Ukraine  
    • Air regulators are investigating new issues with Boeing planes.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Highview Parking charge


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2990 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi guys, thought I would keep u updated.....have now received a 2nd letter in nice red ink "charge notice". The cost has now gone up to £90! They say they will just keep adding money on if I don't cough up. Does a charge notice still mean unenforceable?? I've put this in the bin, but can't help worrying a little!!

Thanx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

They are wrong. The only way your credit rating could be damaged is if the case goes to court ( very unlikely) you lose ( very, very unlikely) and THEN you fail to pay whatever the judge orders within 28 days. Once again a PPC being "economical with the truth".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi to every one that for some unknown reason keeps worrying about these so called parking fines er invoices the following may help I know that it is not the same firm but they are both tared with the same brush

 

VCS speculative invoice

 

To aid your situation and to emphasise anything your own research has found, VCS have recently suffered two defeats at court. One at S****horpe
county court
link3.gif
where their managing director has had to explain to the judge why he issued proceedings in the first place when he had no cause of action.

 

The second, and far more notable case, was before the VAT Tribunal (official known as the Upper Tax Tribunal) where judges have examined the VCS operation and decided that they have insufficient
interest
link3.gif
in any of the land they purport to enforce parking regulations on and that they have no right whatsoever to even offer a contract to park - let alone attempt to chase a maybe-penalty for breaking their rules.

 

This latter case established what is known as case law and is binding on all lower courts. VCS are not going to take you to court and they cannot enforce their invoice.

 

Oh, by the way, it is not, never has been, never will be a "fine". What you got was a speculative invoice, plain and simple. The fact that you believed it to be is simply a testament to the clever way in which their invoices are designed - which is to make you think it is a fine.

 

Stop worrying. Chill out and have a glass of wine/cup of tea/mug of coffee/glass of spring water or whatever your particular poison is and get on with your life.

 

 

I found the above on another thread and have posted it when I see a thread of this type

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear worried26I was in the same poition back in March 2010 and if you check back to posts 44 and 47 you will see the variety of letters I received.Just view them as the idiots they are; making hollow threats which they never follow up : they obviously make sufficent income from those who pay up without researching the companies first.As I said 'worried no more' and still no further communications.Cheers and spend the money on yourself!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all, my case has now been sent to debt recovery plus (baliffs?). They are now demanding the cash amount of £148 immediately, otherwise it will go to court. I'm still not going to pay, but just checking that this is what they normally do.

Thanx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Just to be reassured I'm in the exact same position as worried26.

I received a parking fine from highview parking limited who have now forwarded their debt to debt recovery plus who now want 148.99.

I will be ignoring them also however i would feel more comfortable if someone would post their result of dealing with these companies recently.

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi There everybody!!

 

i got duped into this Highview parking. stayed a couple of hours longer than should have. And normally i check the forums. So i have paid the fine....yes stupid me!! and then checked here after.

 

wanting to know assuming i can get the bank to reverse the payment. Will i still not be liable??? as i have made the payment does that not constitute me acknowledging my guilt to the offence?

 

please let me know your thoughts people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just got landed in the same position as many on here with Highview (£50 rising to £75) It was such a shock as I was pleased with getting a new coat at half price.. not if they can help it!:mad2:

 

1st thing I did after the shock was to google Highview.. and I hit all these PPC fightback forums and I feel I am gonna just ignore them... only one problem I have... there dosen't seem to be anyone who has a final end result!

 

Also should I write or totally ignore?... prefer totally ignore cos I'm not good with this stuff, but will respond and deny if needed to.

 

Hope to god you guys are not messing about...it could get expensive!:|

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore. what happens is that they finally stop sending their silly letters when they latch on to the fact that the person receiving them is not going to fall for their stupid threats.

Edited by DBC
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to reinforce the messages on here and add to people's confidence: Last year on 6/12/11 I received a 'parking charge notice' from Vehicle Control Services for parking at Valley Centertainment in Sheffield. Despite having a receipt that proved I had been a customer of Centertainment, they claimed I had been seen leaving the site. I'd never come across any of this kind of thing before and felt very upset at receiving the notice and having my appeal effectively ignored. My first mistake was in starting any kind of correspondence with them before checking out a forum like this! But after my first email to them attempting to show that I had done nothing wrong I completely ignored them.

To cut a long story short I received the ever escalating threatening letters and demands for increasingly ridiculous sums and handing over to their 'solicitor' prior to taking to court (rejection of appeal letter 13/12/11, Notice of intent to issue court proceedings 4/1/12, Final demand prior to court action 27/1/12, Debt collector 28/3/12, solicitor outlining costs associated with claim and impact on our credit rating 10/4/12, Solicitor final warning before applying to court etc with lots of legal jargonese 23/4/12). Then....absolutely nothing.

So, when on Christmas Eve I received a letter from Highview Parking with photographs claiming I had stayed too long at a carpark in Leeds (on 18/11/12 - over a month before!) and claiming £95 I just laughed at it! Particularly as we still happened to have the parking ticket, with our registration number, which proved we had paid for a full 24 hours. What a [problem]. Needless to say, I'm not going to even bother to reply to say we've got the ticket. I prefer they incur the cost of sending all those silly letters. But this time I also wanted to let everyone else know that NOTHING WILL HAPPEN TO YOU, they are just preying on good people who are being made to feel they are doing something terribly wrong when it's all a lie. They make their money because most people - particularly vulnerable people, just pay up because of the scary 'official' looking nature of the threatening letters. This latest one has me really cross - I have clear evidence (and so must they) that I did nothing wrong, but how many people (other then sad old me) keep their parking tickets for 6 weeks? I have no problem with parking companies making legitimate money, but this kind of stuff is nasty predatory behaviour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...