Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord has unfairly....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5307 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bit of a technical one but here we go. Forgive me for missing certain items as i am still flustered about the whole situation.

 

 

My mum moved into a house about 5 years or so ago. Paid quite a large deposit of around £2000. She moved out less than a month ago now.

 

 

I am furious with the landlord, but he won't speak to me. And my mum is too scared to contact him about this.

 

 

From browsing around the forums, from what it seems, he has done everything by the book, took an inventory of everything and sent a letter recently to her new address, with a list of more than 50 items that are either missing, or damaged. Small things like, 1 single curtain hook missing... £12.

 

 

90% of what he has listed is well overpriced. He has completely disregarded normal wear and tear and the depreciation in the value of certain items, like the used fridge that was there when she arrived, which is at least 7 or more years old, which does not work anymore. Other things like the carpets needing cleaning and a tree we had to cut down as it was destroying the neighbors wall, which he gave permission, and paid for to remove!!!!!

 

 

She paid the deposit well before the deposit scheme of April 2007 so it does not look like she will be covered there. She has renewed the lease several times, details of which i don't know. He did increase the price a couple of times however.

 

 

Not once did he offer to come and replace dead furniture or even paint the walls.

 

 

There is a tiny hole in the wall and my dad put a foot through the ceiling of one of the bedrooms so granted that will be a maximum of £300 to fix... maximum!

 

 

I really don't know where she stands by more than half of the deposit has been taken.

 

 

I probably will have to go back and get some details filled in about this for you guys but this is all i have right now!

 

 

Desperate for some advice!

 

 

Thanks for your time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you find out the dates when the tenancy was renewed? Also, what was the monthly rental?

 

If the tenancy has been renewed since April 2007 then the Tenancy Deposit Scheme should take effect.

 

Without wishing to be too personal why was the hole-y ceiling not repaired / carpets not cleaned prior to your parents moving out? Also, 50 items seems a lot...

 

It sounds like matters, such as the tree/wall, were well known about, so hopefully you won't mind me asking about this too.

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The full inventory list along with the list i will get in an email tomorrow.

 

 

Everything was properly cleaned before she left. Bearing in mind, there was 5 of us living in this house for 5 years. Like i said before, the carpet is, and seems to always be the main problem, its a 2 floor house with 4 bedrooms and a big sitting room, in other words, a lot of carpet. 2 kids and 3 adults, a lot of feet. Wear & tear i say. It's been cleaned and he will not get any cleaner. A steam cleaner was hired for 2 days and everything was spotless. She's not a woman that tolerates mess, trust me! Everything was done by the book, and unfortunately thats where she is getting stung, vulnerability.

 

 

The main reason why the ceiling was not done, is because the landlord is selling the house and its up in the local agency for min asking price of £750,000. The house is in a poor condition as it is and needs a lot of work, a small hole in the ceiling is minor compared to the renovation cost to the property, and whoever purchases the property is bound to restore it. It just seems like a greedy landlord to be honest. Above the ceiling is a loft, its not a gaping hole, its more of a dent where the plaster has cracked and collapsed. Not even 20 cm wide. That may be worth pointing out.

 

 

The tree was discussed, but he is not happy that it had to be cut down and wants it replacing as he feels even though he agreed to it, it only benefited our neighbors and apparently wants a new one replacing. A tree of its same size is going to cost quite a bit. But i don't really think there is much justification in that if he agreed initially. But there is nothing to prove it and the since then neighbors have sold up and gone.

 

 

The tenancy was formally renewed at some point in August so yes it would be covered, even so, he had the deposit in a scheme as soon as she signed the agreement. So all's in order there. However, he is defiantly profiteering and i just can't under stand what (the official amount confirmed) £2218 is compared to the £750,000 min the guy is going to make? It's not going to be rented out again so what's the need in freshening up the carpet?

 

 

I was reading through the LBA template, and i advised her to sort of go along with the general tone of the letter informally first and see what his reaction is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this, helps put matters in some context.

 

So, he produced an inventory when your mum moved in. Now, he is relying on that, whilst not intending to return her deposit (? she paid @£2000 when she move in and his total comes to £2218 ?)

 

Sounds very frustrating at the moment. Let's see the inventory list and see what can be done about it ;)

 

A few thoughts occur to me. Things like the ceiling could be problematical. Is it an older house, say, with a lathe and plaster ceiling? Once an area of plaster is shot, well, you see what the landlord may be concerned about as well.

 

I know it doesn't help matters now, but years ago a young family (who had been good tenants) moved out and although they left the place relatively clean and tidy they 'swopped' items, such as the new LeCreuset cookware for really cheap and nasty stuff.

 

Not only was LeCreuset shown in the original inventory, but they left the price stickers on the new, cheap-o stuff. They were then unhappy that I made a reasonable deduction from their deposit :rolleyes:

 

''Your" landlord does not sound quite so, er, reasonable though. Let's see what he has to say for himself in the inventory!

 

What he's going to possibly make on the sale should not have any bearing on this, really. Again, I know it may not be quite what you want/need to hear at the moment, but let's get his list and see what can be done to help.

 

Will sign back on later tomorrow.

 

(Edit:

(Just realised I may have made an implication about swopping stuff/inventories that was not intended! Sorry!)

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you get this sorted out - will leave it to more knowledgeable people to help you out, I know it's incredibly infuriating (the same thing happened to my mum, about 15 years ago, they completely took advantage of her naivety, and I will still exact revenge on that greedy estate agent if I ever get a chance;)). It's been occurring to me that it's the tenants who ought to have the right to a reference about the landlord!

 

But at least the law has improved in recent years - good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

surely if the fridge was there when you moved in, then it's the LL's responsibility to fix it or replace it..?

 

He agreed re the tree, so I don't think he can suddenly change his mind. Does he mention that it was agreed at all..?

 

Re the hole in the ceiling, that's one thing that you/mum should have fixed - it's damage. It doesn't matter what will happen with the house after the tenant leaves because that's the LL's business and he has the right to expect damages to be paid for.

 

 

...and shouldn't your mum be afforded the opportunity to 'make good'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...