Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I apologise if I was being unclear. Where it currently stands is that they will have it repair, placing scaffolding in our garden for 5 days. They have moved fast, but we will still have to postpone our contractors, meaning, we won't necessarily have the work done in time for the wedding and therefore will incur additional expenses for either a marquee or a wedding venue. They are vehemently against having any kind of liability in any regard but continue repeating that they are legally entitled to use our garden for their repairs (I believe this is true unless the work can be carried out using a cherry picker). The neighbour seems either indifferent or oblivious to the fact they can't reach all of the side of the roof from the space where they can place the scaffolding. They have asked their roofer of choice about using a cherry picker but the roofer has said it wasn't possible. It's not clear whether the roofer doesn't want to use a cherry picker or whether there is an issue with it. They have told us it is a problem that we are installing a gazebo as it will prevent them to access their roof from our garden in the future?!?  
    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think. She was an 'advocate'.. if I recall her intro to me correctly.. So verbal arguments can throw spanners in Court because Plinks dogs outsource their work and send a Junior advocate.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GE Money PPI on Mortgage & a Secured Loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4746 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

New to this forum this weekend, have already had some smashing advice re bank charges...however, I have had some serious problems with GE Money.

They are bullies, and I will try and keep this brief, if anyone can steer me in the right direction I would be most grateful.

 

I have a mortgage with GE money, and last year my husband came out of work, made it hard for us to pay anything back. Despite several communications with them it took them around 6 months to advise me that i could actually go on interest only, but the whole time i was in arrears previously they were charging me lots of fees, which i believe are now added to my mortgage...where do i stand with this.

 

Unfortunately I also have a secured loan with them. This i am still trying to catch up on and I believe that they are charging me £40 per month every month i am behind. obviously this does not help when you are struggling anyway. Can I claim back on secured loans and mortgage?

 

If you can help i would be very thankful, if i need to clarify anything further please ask as TBH i am so stupid when it comes to mortgages/secured loans as to where i stand legally, still trying to read up on everything on this site :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Old_andrew2018

Once you have the paperwork you need to work out the total charges levied.

Armed wth this information you start by approaching the lender asking for it back, this is followed by a Letter Before Action.

This is some advice about what you can claim http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/139339-what-you-can-cannot.html#post1482245

 

Andy

Edited by old_andrew2007
link added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Will get the letters issued straight away and take it from there. i have been reading other posts and they seem to do the same to all their customers who have had difficulties in paying, even when they have made a mistake they threatened me with litigation!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have in my possession a letter from GE with regard to my mortgage. it states:

 

Following a review of your account, your monthly instalment has increased to £xxx.xx with effect from 31st May 2009.

We have made this change to include repayment of your fee balance of £1675.05. Should all payments be received these fees will be repaid over the remaining term of your loan,

Please note: The above revised amount does not include amounts to clear arrears.

Now am i right in thinkin this must be the figure I have incurred in charges and that by them putting this onto my loan i am also now going to pay additional interest on this amount. I know i may seem thick, but i have never claimed anything back in my life so this is all so very new to me.

 

Any opinions most welcome.

Thanks Deli x

Link to post
Share on other sites

on bbc teletext today....

GMAC-RFC mortgage lender fined by FSA for mistreating customers who fell into arrears. They have also been told to repay £7.7 million plus interest to 46,000 of its borrowers. FSA said the company levied unfair charges on customers who fell behind with their payments and were too eager to reposses them. GMAC apologised and some of its charges had been excessive.

I trust this may assist your cause.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question. I have received all info from GE money!! only company that has complied so far!

 

I am currently going through all this information, and there are lots of pages! I am highlighting all the unpaid dd fee and admin charges, the unpaid dd fee seemed to jump from 20 to 25 at some point! also the admin fees are 40 every month you are in arrears, i understand you cannot reclaim solicitors fees, but can i reclaim "additional interest" ?

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so now i am very confused ! The charges put on my account according to the statements i have received right back to 2006, including additional interest comes to £1263.46 by my calculation. Now as you see in my previous post that they are adding my fees of £1675.05 to my mortgage! Where on earth has that figure come from?!:confused::confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, will go for the charges i have added up. I think the rest of the charge they have added to my mortgage were solicitors fees? Are they allowed to capitalise it? Just that means I not only owe them the solicitors fees but going to pay interest on them for the next 20 yrs?!!!

 

Can anyone point me in the direction of the letter i send to request back the charges?

 

I just ask for the charges back and not add the 8% interest, am i right?

 

Thanks x

Edited by delicarik123
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning

In EXACTLY the same position with GE Money. According to the statements, they have not only set out the interest on the loan, but when in arrears there is also another figure which is called 'additional interest', and also has a different 'transfer code' against it.

 

Now my view of all of this is that this is not allowed....i.e.: unlawful, as it would be interest on the arrears which are already increasing due to no payments being made (divorce, work problems, streess....etc)

 

I am already in contact with their solictors and for the charges alone, the sum is over £4500, saucy p*g offered £800!!

 

I have now discovered this additonal interest, [thanks to a colleague], and have now recalculated claim to be in excess of £7000. Have written to them...waiting for response.....

 

I WILL sue for the whole amount if no sensible agreement reached. They cost me so much in streess and unneccessary litigation....

 

 

Watch this space..

 

I am not done with them by a long chalk......they are so similar [identical!] to GMAC.

 

Google their name and see what happened to them!

 

All the best as always

Dougal

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure at one point i had a mortgage with GMAC! I must look that up, maybe worth going for stuff back off them.

 

In the meantime is it this letter i am sending to claim charges back from GE?

 

Request for repayment of charges

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxx

 

 

My request

 

I am writing to ask you to refund to me charges and related interest which you have levied from my account over the last 3 yrs.

 

The High Court has recently decided that your charges are subject to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. I consider that the regime of charges you operate is unfair within the meaning of these Regulations as they are not individually negotiated, they operate in much the same way as charges operated by other High street lenders and therefore there is little alternative to myself but to agree to the charges. Furthermore the charges are contrary to the requirement of good faith and fair dealing as they lack basic standards of commercial moral practice and take an unfair advantage of the weak bargaining power of the consumer. They impose a significant imbalance in the rights and obligations between the contracting parties which is to my detriment. I also consider that the charges may be unlawful at common law.

 

Your responsibilities

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise.

 

I consider that your repeated representations that your charges are fair and reasonable are deceptive and that they have deceived me into agreeing to pay them.

Your concealment of the true nature of your charges has prevented me from asserting my right until now.

 

What I require

 

I calculate that you have taken £XXXXX.

I enclose a schedule of the charges which I am claiming with this letter.

 

My targets to resolve this matter

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I am fully aware of the waiver which you are presently relying upon and which was granted to you by the FSA. However, this is an internal industry matter and has nothing to do with me. It is one-sided and I note that you continue to levy charges and to enforce them despite the weight of judicial and popular opinion against you.

 

I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment.

 

If you dispute that I am entitled to a refund of these charges, then please let me know within the above timescale the basis upon which you dispute together with the reasons why you consider your charges to be fair.

 

If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

After that, there will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim at the expiry of the second deadline.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Or does this only relate to bank charges? I took out any reference to banks and put lender in its place? can any tell me is this ok? Is there anything i need to add or delete?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening

 

I have added/altered your letter a bit...I thought it might help.

 

Any questions or comments please let me know.

 

Dear Sir/Madam, ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxx

 

My request

I am writing to ask you to refund the fess and charges and related interest which you have levied on my account from (date) to (date)

 

The High Court has recently decided that your charges are subject to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. I consider that the regime of charges you operate is unfair within the meaning of these Regulations as they are not individually negotiated, they operate in much the same way as charges operated by other High street lenders and therefore there is little alternative to myself but to agree to the charges.

 

Furthermore the charges are contrary to the requirement of good faith and fair dealing as they lack basic standards of commercial moral practice and take an unfair advantage of the weak bargaining power of the consumer. They impose a significant imbalance in the rights and obligations between the contracting parties which is to my detriment. I also consider that the charges may be unlawful at common law

 

Your responsibilities:

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with **UK** law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in the manner that you have to date, as I had always placed my confidence in your integrity and expertise.

 

I consider that your repeated representations that your charges are fair and reasonable to be deceptive and that those representations have deceived me into agreeing to pay them

 

]Your concealment of the true nature of your charges has prevented me from asserting my right until now

 

What I require

 

I calculate that you have taken £**XXXXX

 

I enclose a schedule of the charges which I am claiming with this letter

 

My targets to resolve this matter

 

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this rather than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I am fully aware of the waiver which you are presently relying upon and which was granted to you by the FSA. This is due to expire in January 2010.

 

However, this is an internal industry matter and has nothing to do with me. It is one-sided and I note that you continue to levy charges and to enforce them despite the weight of judicial and popular opinion against you.

 

I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment

 

If you dispute that I am entitled to a refund of these fees and charges, then please let me know within the above timescale the basis upon which you dispute together with the reasons why you consider your charges to be fair

 

If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

After that, there will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim at the expiry of the second deadline

Yours faithfully

 

As I said, I hope this helps...

 

Regards

 

Dougal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning,

 

Thanks for the compliment - I'm no star- just keen to helkp.

 

I would apply the 8% now, and remember you can always apply to the Court for leave to amend the claim, and alter the interest rate to contractural interest (i.e.: 19.5% - the rate the bank are probably charging you), if neccessary!

 

Best wishes

 

Dougal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening all,

 

My fault -:confused: - it doesn't work exactly like that - somewhere on this site is a bank charges interest calculator. If you can't find it let me know.

 

You enter the date the charge was made, the amount of the charge and the calculator works out how much the interest is, for the period starting when the charge was applied tup o date.

 

It is very easy and you will be surprised at the interest. The calculations are made at the current County Court rate of 8%. You can always amend particulars of claim later if you are going to go for Contractural Interest.

 

Again apologies

 

Best wishes

 

Dougal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I have the calculator thanks, I think I may have confused you in my question lol sorry! I confuse myself half of the time.

 

So I have filled this in, and it has calculated the interest, what i am asking is do i then add this figure to the letter? Sorry if i am not being clear having a bad time of it at the mo!

 

Thanks for all your help

 

Deli

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening,

 

The simple answer (which suits my tiny :shock: brain!!) is to print off the form which has been completed with the charges/dates/interest and send a copy of it to anyone who needs it!!

 

Hope this helps!!

 

Best wishes

Dougal

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...