Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

eon pre-payment meter problems


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5338 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

this is quite a long winded one so please bear with me:

6 years ago i had a pre payment electricity meter fitted by eon.After about 2 years it became apparent that the meter was building a debt up , upon calling eon they told me it was only because they had estimated bills and not to concern myself. About a year later again i contacted them again due to the debt rising - this time i was told that the meter could be wired wrong - i was using other peoples tokens or i had tampered with the meter .This was all before the problems with these meters was so publicised. Last year when i requested something done about this situation they informed me as you are a heatwise customer we do not currently have a key meter compatable with this system , but we will change you meter shortly.

i recieved a letter this week asking me to phone them because they are withdrawing paper cards so they could let me know who will still stock them.When i phoned they said the letter is wrong and they now want to change the meter.There is a debt of £2000 that has bulit up due to eons failiure to calibrate the meter for six years. Being on benefits i simply cannot pay this back along with the huge increase in electricity price i'll have , i cannot change supplier due to having heatwise and nobody else being compatable.

is there anything i can do about this? should i contact cab or bbc watchdog?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was a very common problem for EON prepayment customers upon having their cardmeter changed to a keymeter. Most EON customers have already had their meter changed to a keymeter by now. From what you are saying, I assume that you have an E10 cardmeter. EON are right in saying that there is no such thing as an E10 keymeter unfortunately. I imagine they will be changing it to an E7 keymeter with 7 hours instead of 10 hours worth of cheaper electric.

EON unfortunately are one of the suppliers that say the customer has to pay back the "debt" if they haven;t been efficient enough to recalibrate the cardmeter with the up to date prices previously. Plenty of suppliers just write off such "debts" (eg: EDF, British Gas). Furthermore, they don;t cap the level that can be set on the meter (unlike NPOwer).This policy is a scandal and has been in the news before.

 

E10 is a very good tariff to have if you have got electric storage heaters and certainly better than E7. Many old Eastern Electricity staff in the know had this type of meter fitted in the days of regional electric suppliers. Therefore, I would seriously consider trying to get a quarterly E10 meter fitted, instead of having an E7 keymeter. Whether EON would be prepared to do this is another matter. But this is what I would try for.

 

If you hot brick walls, yes you may wish to go to the industry ombudsman, or indeed Watchdog. I seem to recall that Watchdog got their teetch into the scandal of setting cardmeter "debts" onto new keymeters when the meter gets changed, although I may be wrong. So they may be very interested to hear about this. £2000 is an absolute huge amount that it is claimed has been underpaid, the most I have personally seen before in my job as a meter reader was about £1000 and normally the amount is consideraboly less than this.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also if EON fail to cooperate, you may wish to refuse to cooperate with them in getting the meter changed (is your meter inside your house?). You could highlight the fact that you should not be penalised by paying more for your electric (as you undoubtebly would with an E7 as opposed to an E10 meter), when they could fit a quarterly E10 meter. I say this because a lot of suppliers don;t like changing prepayment for quarterly meters and will do eveything they can to prevent their having to do this. I think this is unfair and should be outlawed (unless the customer has a justifiable debt to pay back).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also Matty, do you know how long it will be before you will no longer be able to buy prepayment cards for your meter. Obviously, it would be difficult to follow the above advice if it leaves you without electric!

 

PS: Heatwise is another term for E10 (or Economy 10) I think, where you get 5 hours of cheaper electric overnight and a 5 hour boost of cheaper electric in the afternoon-evening. Just in case youu're confused by my ramblings!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice , not sure about the tokens , but obviously i dont want eon to change the meter and set the repayment as they see fit , until i have made some arangement.Looking on the consumer direct site it states

In order for them to be able to collect this type of debt, they must be able to prove that they made reasonable attempts to update your token meter after every price rise. (eon have never attempted to adjust)

 

In every instance your supplier should not attempt to backcharge for token meter debt older than 12 months (eon are trying to recover the debt in full)

is there any milage in what consumer direct say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update for anyone else in this position.Eon have said this morning they will only try to recover any debt accrued from 2005-2007 - they are currently calculating this and sending it to me.They have also said that they accept that i will not let them update my meter until we have negotiated in writing the level of repayment , thanks for the help , i will update in due time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful Matty - eon may say that but they may not keep to their word. Once a keymeter is fitted, I believe a debt can be fitted to the meter remotely and that they do not physically have to get someone to your home (and meter) to set it. You physically would not be able to prevent them setting it on your meter once you have the keymeter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice matt , id already thought of this thats why i'll insist on having it i writing , i'll still probabily fight the amount that they come back with because im now led to believe they can only back bill me 12 months , we'll see in time

Link to post
Share on other sites

just an update eon have now said they are prepared to write off £1300 of the bill , but i must pay £700 that was accrued between Apr 2005 and apr 2007.When i asked them to justify the amount ,they have simply sent me a statement of account from 2008 onwards and not anything from 2005-2007. They also said they have tried to update my meter on several occasions but cannot get access , i asked them to prove this and they did not respond , my meter has been read by eon on 5-6 occasions while this debt has built up , so how can they say they cant acces my meter , i have put in a formal complaint and i think this could end up being a long drawn out affair!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick to your guns, Matty! £700.00 is a huge amount of moeny to pay back and they have not provided proof that you owe it.

It is Eon's fault if they did not make suitable arrangements to reset the prices on the old cardmeter. Unless you did not keep to a prebooked appointment or you refused access to the meter, they should not be setting the debt on the meter, whatever their terms and conditions may state. Other companies, as already stated, do not set such "debts" on keymeters.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...