Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

UK debt being Chased in Australia


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3802 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Securitized basically means the 'portfolio of debts which included projected estimates of the value of any attached assets (ie housing 'secured' on alleged debt) has been sold to the highest bidder in an attempt to

 

1. Recoup any projected losses and get the dodgy stuff off their books

2. Make money for the poor struggling company who no longer has the clients in their grip.

 

Hope I've expressed it as simply as possible. Its a common term for reselling dodgy deals to hide the evidence and has resulted in the collapse of a few mortgage lenders...

 

Hi Sillyg

 

Great Summary

 

Mr W

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 538
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I got one last night from P****** and almost fell off my chair! Not only was it addressed to me but included a letter to someone that used to live at the same address as me in the UK!

 

Seeing this forum this morning has alleviated my worst fears! Thanks guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

definatly one for the privacy laws, they just get worse these guys, dont send the letter back to them whatever you do, nice piece of evidence that, also as stated in the forum dont get involved in any communication with them apart from in writing, was it a notice of entitlement or section 80,

 

what state are you in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in WA. I have just got a default off my Credit File after 7 years for something I don't remember having and had no proof of such, so this scared the S*** out of me yesterday.

 

I actually thought about calling them and just paying it, but then I started to think to myself that a UK debt is just that. It can't be transferred overseas. So I thought I'd have a look around today and stumbled across this forum!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goodness me - that's a new low!! ASIC and the Privacy Commissioner will be very interested in that one - make sure you let them know. Plenty of help here for you with making complaints and writing letters blackdogupya! :)

 

EDIT - definitely will be statute-barred and not allowed to be listed on your Credit File then. I'm so pleased you managed to find us, long story.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sound the bells again huh...another new member, very sorry to hear they are still going and getting dirtier as time goes on.

 

Have they listed a default on your file? If they do, another nice piece of evidence for your compensation case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

G'day All,

 

Have just a quick question.

 

Have been going through assignments and the UK Law of Contracts and nowhere can I find a reference that the original terms and conditions of a contract can be changed without my approval when assigned. I think that may come under a novation if i am correct but would like someone with better understanding to clarify if at all possible.

 

It would seem that P*****r are trying to fob off the Aussie regulators that since they bought the debt it becomes an Aussie contract.

 

A UK CCA contract does'nt meet the CCC requirements of legal undertaking as the contract must have been made in the juristiction relevant to the CCC to be able to comply with the law as under s5 and s6.

 

Thx in advance

 

Bodgit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been going through assignments and the UK Law of Contracts and nowhere can I find a reference that the original terms and conditions of a contract can be changed without my approval when assigned. I think that may come under a novation if i am correct but would like someone with better understanding to clarify if at all possible.

 

 

Wouldn't matter to much anyway Bodgit.

 

Governing law in this instance is the UK Consumer Credit Act 1974 (as ammended). There is a clause in the CCA that specifies no clause in a regulated contract can overide the provisions of the act.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note from previous replies that a UK debt is not enforceable in Oz unless perhaps, there has been a CCJ granted in a UK court. How would I know if a CCJ had been issued against me? would I have to be there?

No, not even then as I understand it, unless it was for a crown debt, Tax, fines etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

I'm another one, I'm afraid. Thanks to Bobgit for starting the forum and cornflake girl, dodgeydebt and others for keeping us informed. I am also interested to know if anyone has had anything taken further than just legal threatening letters. I would have thought too that they wouldn't have a leg to stand on in an aussie court. Surely they would have to hold up the UK Sharkleycard agreement and claim the UK debt is payable in OZ under what law ? However, it is easy to get intimidated and I'm sure that it their main (and perhaps only) tactic. I am assuming it's just a numbers game to them.

 

I will write to the CRA in the morning. The more of us who do this, the more chance we will have on us getting them removed.

 

 

Thanks again for all you tips.

 

Goldcoast

Edited by Goldcoast
don't need to mention names
Link to post
Share on other sites

Goldcoast, Have sent you a PM.

 

Recieved a reply from the ubiqutious Sp**re legal head claiming that a UK debt can miraculously be turned into an Australian debt by the simple matter of an assignment and that therefore the UK law no longer applies.

 

Thanks to the CAG boy's and girls for all your help so far. I'm sure we will be back soon with more miracles that can be performed through the wonders of some idiots legal Inadequacies.

Bodgit

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think these Aussie firms thought they could make a quick buck by trying to con new immigrants to Oz in the hope that they would pay up so as not to get into trouble in their new country

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bodgit

 

I find myself, or rather my husband, in a very similar boat. Lived in the UK for ages and then moved to Oz with family. Hubby was supposed to have settled all his credit card debts when leaving but didn't! I had no idea as it is his debt and not mine. I'm fuming but not alot I can do now!

Anyway, to cut a long story short a letter has been received from a debt recovery agent in UK. Unfortunately, it would appear that they were given our address here by a drunken relative in the UK. Letter states that it's a letter before action. Amount owed is just over three grand (pounds) but they are willing to accept about half, otherwise will now start litigation process with the bailiffs coming round etc. Looks like a computer generated letter but not sure as I haven't received one before.

Hubby apparently had been paying them small amounts till about a year ago when he couldn't afford it anymore.

Have tried to look up various sites in oz for information/advice and seem to be stuck. Advised that they have two options, can either get ccj in england and then seek to register it in Oz (as per Foreign Debt Bill) & then enforce or instruct solicitor in oz to get ccj and enforce warrant of execution.

Have read your thread and I'm still confused as to where we stand? Still not entirely sure or convinced of the jurisdiction but someone did point out to me that jurisdiction may not be an entirely plausible defence given that they offered to halve debt.

I'm of the opinion that we try to settle the debt as offered or come to some type of agreement but hubby seems to think that it can't be enforced here as it would be too costly. He thinks they are just trying on the bullyboy tactics to scare us into paying.

What worries me is that it is not my debt and if it is pursued over here then where does that leave me and my son? Majority of belongings etc, I purchased so do not want them seized by a bailiff/sheriff or my house for that matter.

 

Assume we have to ask for a copy of the credit card agreement? Is this the right place to start?

 

Any help or additional info you can shed on this would be great. If you the details of other aussie sites I could look at that would be wonderful.

Hope you can help.

Jazzi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx Guys once again.

 

Have learnt a huge load of information from you all.

 

Basically the consumer solicitors from legal aid are now in the process of starting investigations into this company.

 

Australia are in the process of a review of the debt collection practices here. The people I have spoken to are non judgemental and very supportive of our situations which is great news for us.

 

They have stated exactly what Cerberus and the others have iterated in so far as they have to gain a CCJ in UK before any court in Aus could contemplate looking at the case.

 

Even then you can have the CCJ overturned if they already knew you were overseas when they had applied to the courts for it, as they lied to the court....not a good thing to do.

 

Am still waiting for the ICO to give a defintive answer to the Data protection Act Eighth Principle breaches. Not sure if I'll ever recieve one. Will keep badgering them though...

 

Cheers

 

Bodgit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jazzi,

 

Don't Worry. as stated above they cannot have a CCJ if they know you're overseas. You must be issued with an summons at a uk address so you can defend any action.

 

To have any action taken in Aus they must first gain a judgement in uk. then try and have that enforced in the Aussie high court. Only an Aus high court can make a judgement on this matter. It's been set up for big business debts really and not unsecured debts.

 

The issue has arisen here because this DCA has an idiot for a legal rep.

 

This is the first time any Aus DCA as bought a UK debt and tried to list it on our Aus credit file.

 

There is no legal recourse open and no ability to alter the original terms of a UK contract to meet the Credit act of australia.

 

PM your details and I explain more.

 

Bodgit

Edited by Bodgit
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bodgit & everyone.

 

Have had another read of the previous postings and it's been very helpful. Still not entirely sure what my next step is though.

 

Jazzi

 

 

P.S. since posting this I've come across an article from the Times online 10/10/09, which refers to a test case Phillip McGuffick v RBS whereby the enforceability of CCA's was in question. Ruling that whilst may not be enforceable the contract, rights & obligations remained. Does this now likely to alter previous advice?

Edited by Jazzi
Added info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this now likely to alter previous advice?
Not at all, in fact it confirmed that legal action could not be taken only that sending begging letters and trashing credit files is not (in the mindset of that particular judge) enforcement. But that doesn't affect you anyway because you're in a totally different jurisdiction.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info.

 

Wondered if someone could give me some advice as to what I do now? Do I need to make contact with the DCA in UK? Not sure what to do next. The last letter was a letter before action and referred to a reduced payment, which they said would be noted on the credit file as a partial payment.

 

Having now read various threads on this site I have come to understand that this is not a full and final settlement and whilst they get their money, if we coughed up, they are likely to sell on debt for balance with next shark asking for balance or more! Have a limited time to make contact but not sure what to do at this stage or if there is anything that I should be doing at this stage. Do I just need to sit tight? Assume it will be farmed out to their solicitors to deal then but not sure.

 

If I am supposed to make contact, does this have to be by paper mail or can it be online via e-mail?

 

Urgent advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Jazzi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...