Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tesco Direct order cancelled after payment taken ?


joolzmc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have fortunately not found myself in this position before and help would be much appreciated.

 

I placed an order with Tesco Direct ( a pre-order for windows 7 ) on 12th September and the funds were duly taken from my account on that day, since then I have had to cancel my debit card which I did yesterday ( 19th) I did not see any problem with this as I thought everything was in order until a phone call a couple of hours ago from Tescos.

 

I was advised that my order had been cancelled as they had been advised my debit card had been cancelled. I confirmed my debit card had been cancelled on the 19th but this was 7 days after I had made a purchase from them. I was told that as my card had been cancelled there was no choice but to cancel my order and I could no longer re-place my order as the price had now increased by nearly £100. I was advised by the guy that I spoke to that no discretion could be taken ( whatever he was talking about )

 

I thought that by Tesco taking my money we had entered into a contract:???:. My order was cancelled by them some 8 days after this contract was entered into... the reason being my debit card was cancelled yesterday, I pointed this out but was advised that as I had not recieved my goods they were entitled to do this :???:

 

Please can someone let me know where I stand as I am currently waiting for a supervisor to call me back and I would like to have the correct information. Has a contract been formed beween myself and Tesco and should I push further for them to fulfill my order that they have cancelled even though they are aware that my transaction was legitimate ?

 

The funny thing is I placed an order with tesco books on the 19th September I haven't received that yet but that order is ok !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Can you confirm that the money was actually taken from your account, IMHO most on-line retailers will debit your account on dispatch of the goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you confirm that the money was actually taken from your account, IMHO most on-line retailers will debit your account on dispatch of the goods.

 

Yes Tescos most definately took the payment from my account the day the order was placed ( 12th ), they have had the money as they have refunded me ( 20th ) card cancelled 19th . Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

You are not the only one. I ordered a laptop from tesco direct on 12th july, they called me two days after saying exactly the same. That it was a mistake and I had to pay 100 pounds more. After explainng uk laws about online shopping they said they would send it. I called them on 17th july and they promised it would be delivered by yesterday. Still waiting. I just sent them an email to see what they say about this.

I am almost certain I will not see the laptop unless I pay 100 more. They will keep on telling me to wait for the dispatch until I cancel the order or pay.

Disgusting attitude!

I am joining the groups of people against tesco.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got a reply to my email. They decided without my consent, to refund the money. We´ll see if at least that is true.

Can I do something productive against them? Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My circumstances were slighty different. ( cannot establish if your card was cancelled prior to dispatch or it was a misprice Tesco have just not honoured )

 

I had taken advantage of a special offer price which was a valid offer and not a misprice, the money was taken but the item was on pre-order so was not being dispatched immediately, the period from when I paid Tesco prior to dispatch I cancelled my card, Tesco .'. assumed it was a fraudulent transaction. I tried to expain that it wasn't however I was automatically refunded and told I could rebuy at the new increased price.

 

In the end I did get it sorted but this was due to the fact that is was a genuine offer ( not a misprice ) and Tesco's using it's vigilence believing my card had been stolen, they therefore agreed to resell at the original price once they fully established the circumstances and realising that it was not a fraudulent transaction.

 

I did check with consumer direct and apparently for online sales and according to Tesco's T&C's a contract is not formed until item is dispatched, the earmarking or taking of the funds does not constitute a contract in these circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and even more news!

Tesco direct has called me to lie to me!!!!

they were saying that the reason why my order was cancelled is because the courier did not find the address and he gave me a call. Apparently, in this call, I told them I did not know anything about any tesco order. (Can this argument be any more ridiculous?)

Not only I did not get a call from them the day they claim to have called me, I do not have any call at all that day.

And unable to find the address? A lot of things I buy online are delivered to the same place with no problem whatsoever.

It´s outrageous.

The answer from tesco is of course, you need to place a new order (100 pounds more)

Link to post
Share on other sites

and even more news!

Tesco direct has called me to lie to me!!!!

they were saying that the reason why my order was cancelled is because the courier did not find the address and he gave me a call. Apparently, in this call, I told them I did not know anything about any tesco order. (Can this argument be any more ridiculous?)

Not only I did not get a call from them the day they claim to have called me, I do not have any call at all that day.

And unable to find the address? A lot of things I buy online are delivered to the same place with no problem whatsoever.

It´s outrageous.

The answer from tesco is of course, you need to place a new order (100 pounds more)

 

Perhaps the courier misdialled ? and that is why you have not spoken to anyone and the person they did speak to was obviously not aware of any order iykwim.

 

I would email them setting out all the facts and deal with one person in order to get it sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...