Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell and SAV Credit Limited *** SUCCESS ***


gust
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4124 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No the limitation act states that the clock starts from the date of the cause of action, or something like that?

 

In simple terms, the SB clock starts ticking from the day you fail to pay, and remains ticking until 6 years is reached, or you make a payment or written acknowledgment that you owe it, then it resets the clock.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ok

 

so the agreement was 2004

 

lowel wrote to me first about this april 2009. and said that my SAV credit limited account has been sold to them.

 

I wrote and told lowell i didnt know who they are later in the year.

 

so does it sound like SAV credit are another DCA i have mysteriously never heard of?

 

very confusing.

 

anyways i wrote to robinson way and sent them a copy of the agreement scanned (signature made unscannable)

 

and told them the agreement doesnt conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) etc and cannot be enforced.

 

 

hope this is the way forward.

 

now waiting for response.

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, So when did you stop paying toward this?

How much roughly is it?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its about £650

 

i will have to hunt through old statements for a closed account to find out when i last payed.

 

cheers - will find that out when i get 5

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

getting there - been sifting old statements from a closed account. Need to double check on another acc and then i will know

 

ta

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Have you found out when you last made a payment on this account yet?

 

Late 2005 was last payment

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks

 

Best to send to Lowell as they picked it up from SAV? or robinson way as they are the last lot to bug me about it

 

 

thanks

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks so just send this or add anything?

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that under the limitation act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under their debt collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from myself in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to CPUTR2008

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'd keep it simple like this (courtesy of Brig)

 

Formal Notification re Limitations Act 1980

 

I refer to the above mentioned account.

 

I have been checking my records and I have concluded that the aforementioned debt is now statute barred and I will not therefore make any payment or

offer of payment now or in the future.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states states that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to CPUTR2008

 

Yours faithfully

 

Send recorded.

 

It will up to them to prove it is not SB of they want to continue.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks very much

 

Although i have delved deeper into this alleged debt - i have noticed the account number and card number is totally different from anything i recognise.

 

I sent a prove it letter ages ago as i never heard of SAV - i got sent back a crappy agreement with HFC/beneficial card agreement which had hand written account numbers on it and some lloyds banking group complement slip with a credit card number on it which i have never owned either! To be fair the agreement looks butchered anyways. shower of cack.

 

So really its highly unlikely i payed anything - maybe SAV changed details before they passed it on? who knows - I guess either way its over 6 years any way - so SB is the way to go right? :)

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

reply from robinson

 

they say - our client confirmed the agreement i recieved off them is sufficient to establish liability.

 

to update i sent prove it letter in 2009 and lowell sent me a copy of some agreement SIX months later. This agreement has no payment terms etc.

 

robinson also say they have no records of an on going dispute and a payment was made in 2008... So claiming NOT stat barred. My first letter from lowell was in 2009! I have checked my bank statements from the date they stated but obviously NOTHING was payed to them.

 

and now want my proposal for payment in 14 days

 

This is getting VERY annoying.

 

alledged debt with SAV credit - but the so called agreement is benny bank mastercard. Lowell suposedly obtained it from lloyds banking group as they stapled the complement slip from them to said "agreement" Thing is though i have an old statement from my old mastercard and the number is totally different to what they claim is mine....

 

What now? I have SAR'd HFC today for various info for a few things - I will have proof the card number isnt mine but SAR will take a while.

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they claim a payment was made ask for proof and if they can't provide it they will have to accept it's statue barred. It's not uncommon for DCA's to claim this.

I'd want details of the account and the amount, failing that I wouldn't bother to respond if you are sure.

They won't take it further not for an old debt they paid pence for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so robinson way write back and all they can say is the information about "payment" in 2008 was from their client and did nothing to prove this. I asked amount, account etc. (i made no payment anyways)

 

they then say they are no longer instructed to deal with this matter and the "account" has been closed on our files and returned to the creditor.

 

I asked for a copy of their complaints procedures which in reply they say - please find enclosed - BUT didnt bother to include with the letter lol...

 

So RW are ducking out of this one it seems...

 

Back to Lowell. Lowell know damn well I never made any payment.

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

i told robinson way its stat barred - they say lowell told them a payment was made in 2008 - checked CRA files AND bank statements an no payment was ever made

 

clutching at ways to stop me stat barring so they can annoy me further and try to pressure me.

 

I will just wait and see what crock of XXXX lowell come up with now

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am writing to lowell

 

should i use their PO box number , PO Box 172, Leeds LS11 9WS or would it be best to write to their registered office - enterprise house, 1 apex view, leeds LS11 9BH

 

thanks

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that it? That's not an agreement. It's even a poor excuse for an application form. There is not one prescribed term on it - credit limit, interest rate and repayment schedule - and no Terms and Conditions. I take it you also didn't get any statements. Lowells can go and whistle. I would simply write to Lowells Complaints Department and tell them that as far as you are concerned the matter is finished and any further contact from them pursuing a non-debt will be reported to the OFT Consumer Credit Licence Fitness Department. Then I would ignore anything else they sent.

 

just looked back and missed this - no i didnt get any statements

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...