Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

order of sale by DCA( deadline next week)


caller
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5354 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had not defence my CCJ case (not thinking properly, not knowing this site, wrong advice from CAB) and resultly got a CCJ and straight away the DCA applied for CO (they don't bother to content/chase/nego with me about money at all at that stage, a long time).

 

Now I get a CCJ and A CO hanging at my head.

 

After the CO occer, they suddenly chased me harshly and keep changing what amout they wanted.

 

I lately asked them if they get any assignment evident from the OC since I don't have a clue who they are and the amout they chased after.

 

I might do it wrongly or I pushed some button, the DCA straight claiming they want the full payment and they would apply order of sale deadline next week.

 

I had gotten advice form my last thread (thanks for all the people here) and I had sent for my SAR file from my OC. I am still waiting for it. I plan to look into my file and then I might have a chance to set aside the CCJ and get rid of the CO. They could chase me in a new case and this time I (thanks for this site) could properly defense and get back my right.

 

The OC replied last week asking for copy of passport etc( **** they need a copy of the passport/driving licence and the signature on this must be the same as the signature for the Account. Could any one tell me : are you, by law, must sign every legal document at the same signature? my friend told me he sign in different ways for different banks cards to avoid fradulant), anyway I sent a copy and forgot to (too many things to struggle and my mind always not clear) temper proof the signature. Now I am very worry somehow someone could lift it off.

 

Anyway, what should I do now, I haven't get the SAR file back, should I send in the set aside form now OR I should ask the court to assign the monthly payment.

 

Would the above work as they are submitting 'order of sale ' at the same time? Actually to spend £75 now for the set aside at my situation it's a a huge mountain for me to climb.

 

What should I do now? Please any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks for advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks sequenci,

 

Who is the creditor

a credit card

 

How much is the debt?

under £5000 with those late payment interest etc, panlty charges, solicitor fees etc

 

Is the property jointly owned?

solo under my name

 

Have you children?

I have a kid over 19 still financial rely on me

 

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't send them anything with your signiture on it. they have no legal grounds in which to ask for such, all they need to produce the documents you asked for is the account details such as your name, address and date of birth, but in most cases just an account number or reference number will do.

 

it sounds to me that they are after your signature so they can attempt to recreate the original document and pass it of as a true copy of the origianal, when really it just a newly created document in which they have added the signature from your passport too and hoped to pass of as a true copy.

 

You DO NOT have to sign all legal documents with the same signature. there is no law that exists that says you do have too. that is why many CAG memebers will advise you not to sign any letters or documents that you are sending to creditors or DCA's, and instead to use a computerised font on your letters and documents.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, teaboy2,

 

i am afraid I already done that as my mind was not clear at that moment. I feef horrible now. I first sent for the SAR file hoping to set aside the CCJ and CO, now the order of sale is hanging on my head and it seems you are right, the OC acted very suspeciously.

 

If they lifted my signature and provided this as a true copy of credit aggreement then I have no charge to set aside and it looks definitely I would lose my home.

 

I still waiting for my SAR file, should I do anything now to the OC, should I another letter to warn them it's illegal to lift my signature ect.

 

And at the same time, should I sent in set aside form and vary of payment(N245) at the same time.

 

I am very struggle with money therefore I am trying to save any penny. I would like to sent the N244 set aside form next week since the DCA claimed they would send the order of sale form to court next week. Would this help to hold them until the hearing of set aside.

 

Sorry so many things to ask... any advice wold be very appreciated, thanks in advance.

 

Caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, need every advice for my N244 form

 

Coudl I write the reason for set aside as

 

  1. the DCA did not have assignment letter, thus no legal right of the alleged debt
  2. the DCA could not provide the credit agreement
  3. I had not defended myself because I am badly advised by CAB (it's true)
  4. No DN

The DCA had refused to give me a copy claiming that I had admitted the debt and therefore they are under no oblignation to give me one under consumer law. I would like to send another request (after hand in the N244) using CRP rule.

 

I have 2 major obstacle now beside the normal risk

 

The judge might think

a) I didn't defend before and

b)I haven't paid the DCA anything yet,

the judge would I just a [problem] and refused a set aside hearing

(From my last experience,I had a very nasty judge sat at my CCJ and CO hearings, so I am very very afraid of judges nowadays)

 

As you see I had send in my signaure for my SAR, I am now very worried that out of a blow they would provide a copy of credit agreement from nowhere.

 

Any help would be very very appreciated, I had all help from every direction since I am tracking on water here to prepare for the set aside hearing without any legal mind at all.

 

HELP! Please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the Judge has a legal obligation to hear your defence, they will not automatically think that you are doing a '[problem]', if anything it is the DCAs haste in getting a charging order which is the '[problem]'.

 

You don't need a legal mind to defend yourself, just a clear head and stay in control of your temper... believe me it is easy to 'loose it' when the DCA's duty solicitor (for that is what they usually use) state "we have no hope of recovering funds from this debtor"... that is when you clearly state "Sir or Madam, the creditor has not provided any documentation to support their particulars of claim and are relying on nothing more than a printed pierce of paper from their clients which state the amount owed. No statements have been provided and no original documentaion provided. At this stage an application form is not sufficient for them to tie the alleged debt to myself."

 

Forget the 'legal stuff'', just have a couple of statements like this written down and odds on the judge will listen. If you start clouding the issue with the various CCA legislation they may throw YOU out...

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to fill in the N244 form with our help WITHOUT the SAR information, the fact that you still have not got this can be added to the details ie

 

On XXX date I sent a SAR request to the original creditor, requesting full details of their allegations as none had been supplied prior to the judgement by default (for this is what it was) was obtained. To date no information has been supplied, this should be sufficient in itself to question their allegations as to the true amount owed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, All

 

Hope you don't mind I would like to ask for more help here, this time it is about how to fill the N244 form :-

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

at Q3, What order are you asking the court to make and why?

 

should I just mentioned the CCJ or I should mention the CO too, The DCA claimed they would apply Order of Sale next week, should I mention that as well.

 

at Q4, Have you attached a draft of the order you are applying for? Yes/NO

 

I don't know what is this.

 

at Q5 How do you want to have this application dealt with?

 

I think I should marked 'choice a hearing'?

 

at Q6 How long do you think the hearing will last

 

Shoud I marked 15 Mins? 30 MIns? I don't know what should I fill

 

at Q8 What level of Judge does your hearing need?

 

Should I fill 'district judge'

 

at Q10 What information will you be relying on, in support of your application?

a)the attached witness statement

b) the statement of case

c) the evidence set out in the box *below * this is a big empty space for me to fill in and some printed word : statement of Truth for applicat to sign

 

I don't know what they are; should I choice (b) in my case; do I need to fill something on the big empty space and sign the statement of Truth.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Any hints/advice would be much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi caller

 

Follow the advice given above and you should be ok. Also keep the letter from the OC that asked you for the signature to show it to the judge as you could argue that the OC had no legal grounds to require a copy of your signature and argue that you believe that any forth coming documentation could have been falsefied by the OC by the use of your signature.

 

Explain to the judge that if the said documentation still existed then they are legally obliged to produce such documentation without the need of any identification documents complete with your signiture. It may sound a long shot, but using it along with their so far non complience with your subject access request could prove a valid point in the eyes of the judge.

 

End of the day it is the claiment that has to strait prove of the debt and you can request they provide evidence as to why they required your signature. Am sure the judge would be interested in knowing as to why aswell, as no doubt this will not be the judges first case with regards to disputed debts. so the judge will be aware that it is unusaul for the OC to have made such a request for signature prior to them producing the documents requested.

 

So you could also add to your defence that you have reasonable grounds to believe that the claiment has falsified documentation or intends to do so given their request for your signature prior to providing you with your Subject access request.

 

If the judge asks why you went ahead and send copies of your signature just state that like you have on here that your mind was in to places at once becuase of the threat of losing your home over this.

 

Also with dca refusing to give you a notice of assignment stating you have admitted the debt and therefore they are not required to provide you with one under consumer law, is i believe a false statement. as you are prefectly entiled to have one regardless of weather you admit to the debt or not.

Edited by teaboy2

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I now need is

 

The amount of the alleged debt

The name of the original creditor

The name of the DCA/Solicitors who took you to court

 

then the fun begins - remimber I have now had seven solicitors told off in court for being 'poorly prepared' or not knowing all the facts of the case - six of those were cases I dealt with on this site at a distance and one I did for a colleague who defended a dodgy catalogue claim... thats this years tally so far, lets get this set aside first.

 

You can PM me the details and I can help further if you don't want them on the site. I can download a copy of the N244 and use that.

 

You should have it ready to take to the court on Monday - I also need to know where your local court is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Caller

 

I have sent a message to supersnopper whos a memeber of the site team so expect a member of the site team to take a look at this thread and give you some more valueable help and advice, along with the advice we and others have and will give you. Also listen to sillygirl shes been through all this before and has alot of experience to draw back on to help you out with this.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Q10 is where you set everything out in you 'statement of case'

 

The statement I gave you is for use in court should you need it, I believe in keeping it simple and avoid the need to remember court acts and dates which miight give the other side a chance to counter with a legal argument you won't understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, many thanks to you all, sillygirl, teaboy2, supesnooper,

 

I am sorry I could reply you all earlier, I do not have internet at home and I rely the computer of my small local library with limit time usage. Apology to you all sincerely.

 

I am so grateful for all your help.

 

Caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sillygirl,

 

your advices are so great. Thanks again for your great help and I thanks for you to let me use the PM. I properly PM you later (sorry I could not tell you what time since I don't have internet at home and no scanner at local library, I would try to find a internet cafe) and posted the draft of the N244 form. Thanks again and again.

 

caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, all, I couldn't not find any scanner at this moment, I typed the letter here I mentioned before : response from the OC regarding the SAR file, the OC are requesting the 'right signature' form me : -

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

xx September 2009

 

Dear XXXX,

 

Thank you for your request to be provided with personal data pursuant to theData Protection Act 1998.

 

For security reasons we require you to provide a form of positive identification ( an example of acceptable identification would be a copy of a driving licence or passport which includes the main cardholders signature*). Althought statement information has been sent to you at your address a current postal address is not an adequate form of identification. Due to the amount of personal information XXXX(name of the OC) will be sending in the Subject Access Request, including bank details, security information, places of birth and dates of birth, we would require extra identification from our customers.

 

Yours sincererly,

signature signed

(Compliance Department)

 

* these words are in bold on the letter

 

__________________________________________________________

 

Thanks all

 

Caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, all, I couldn't not find any scanner at this moment, I typed the letter here I mentioned before : response from the OC regarding the SAR file, the OC are requesting the 'right signature' form me : -

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

xx September 2009

 

Dear XXXX,

 

Thank you for your request to be provided with personal data pursuant to theData Protection Act 1998.

 

For security reasons we require you to provide a form of positive identification ( an example of acceptable identification would be a copy of a driving licence or passport which includes the main cardholders signature*). Althought statement information has been sent to you at your address a current postal address is not an adequate form of identification. Due to the amount of personal information XXXX(name of the OC) will be sending in the Subject Access Request, including bank details, security information, places of birth and dates of birth, we would require extra identification from our customers.

 

Yours sincererly,

signature signed

(Compliance Department)

 

* these words are in bold on the letter

 

__________________________________________________________

 

Thanks all

 

Caller

 

not alot can be done now that you already sent the ID. so basically just do what we have said in earlier posts and if they have not provided the documents before the court hearing ask the judge to order them to do so.

 

stick to your guns about your concerns for the faking of the signiture to create false documentation and stait them to prove they are the true copies of the originals and to provide you with what legal reason they required your ID with signiture when it was already confirmed as to who you are. becuase if they hadnt confirmed you to be who they are making the claim against then it would never have gone to court and they would have had no legal grounds to place a CCJ against you if they werent 100% certain as to your ID. becuase if they were not 100% certain as to who you were then they could be placing a CCJ against someone completely innocent. or at least that would be my argument.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, teaboy2, thanks for your good advice.

 

I am going to complete the N244 with all the good advice gathering at my thread.

 

I would read more in the forum and would post more question to prepare the hearing later once I know the hearing date.

 

Thanks to you all.

 

Caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, all.

 

Trying to complete the N244 form now, is it enough to just submit 'the statement of case' --( try to put it in a very short clear form without any special legal term and submit this week)at this stage .

 

Or must I write in 'the attached witness statement' as well, if not, should I do it after confirmation of the hearing date and then submitting one to the court

 

and if there's more add-on then something submit another paper called 'amendment of withness statement'?

 

Sorry quite confuse with all this term and procedures... What is a 'skeleton statment' & 'defence statment'? when do someone use it during the court procedure?

 

Please any advice would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some help please to fill the form

 

On the N244 form, Paragraph 3

 

Qs3 . What order are you asking the court to make and why?

 

I intend to write this

Take Notice that the Defendant asked the court to set aside and stayed the County Court Judegement and the Charging Order as new evidence/developement could let the defendant to defense successfully asto the claimant's particular of claim

Qs 4 Have you attached a draft of the order you are applying for? Yes/No

 

Don't know what to say?

 

Qs 6 How long do you think the hearing will last?

 

Should I say 15..... or 30 minutes or 1 hour?

Qs 9 who should be served with this application?

And as on the claim form for the CCJ, there's a claimant (A )and the solicitor (B) on anothe box of ' the address for sending documents and payments.

Who should I put on the form? the claimant A or both A & B

------------------------------------------------------------

I am preparing some essay I think I would put it as the statement of case to attached with form and I try to make it clear and short.

 

I would like to say the alleged claim is not enforcement due to

 

1) no NoA

2) no DN

3) get big misleading advice from CAB and thus not doing the right thing at the right time to appeal with the CCJ

 

I know these point not sounding very promissing but I would give it a go.

 

Anyone? could you share your experience .....

 

Any opinion would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...