Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vodafone/Nokia 5800 LCD screen not covered by warranty***RESOLVED***


Guest coz1873
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4954 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest coz1873

OK - got a Nokia 5800 back in March. Already had the common speaker fault repaired, now the LCD screen is 'cracked'. I took it to Vodafone who said its not covered by warranty so will cost £40 to fix. I am disputing this because I never did anything to break it. There is not a scratch or mark on my phone. I sent a text, put it on a seat, picked it up 10 mins later and half the screen was badly pixelated.

 

A bit of arguing on the phone and was told that 'We don't cover the LCD screen under warranty'. First thing first, I though that by UK law EVERYTHING has to be covered by a 1yr warranty. That can't just exclude whatever parts they want, can they??... Any experts out there?????

 

Secondly, I fully understand that phones get dropped, kicked etc... but they MUST be able to withstand reasonable use and handling. I know it hasn't been abused but they only have my word for that - fair enough, but I am telling them that if they can prove there is damage then I will pay. They can't! The woman on the phone even said 'you might have pressed the screen too hard'. How hard would you press a screen? It is a touch screen, designed to be pressed. 'even in your pocket it could have been damaged'. Firslty, it hadn't been in my pocket when it broke but, its a phone, do I need to carry it wrapped in bubble-wrap???

 

Advice please. They have be over a barrel in the sense that I won't get my phone back til I pay them, but I am going to follow this up.

 

Years of avoiding Nokia - now I know why :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a common problem, but the answer won't be to your liking. These screens are VERY fragile. They don't have to be dropped or what you would normally refer to as 'abuse'. Twisting the frame of the phone is enoug for the LCD panel to fracture. You can argue that it isn't fit for purpose, but then, if you got caght in the rain, that won;t be covered either.

 

LCD screens when over 3" in any phone are subject to considerable stresses. If the phone is candled with care, then it will work for years, but it is quite possible to have a phone is your back pocket, sit down and the screen has malformed requiring a replacement. The last one I saw was in a Mc Donalds, they guy had the phone in his top inside pocket, bent actoss the table to grab something from the seat opposite, and the edge of the table caused the stress to crack the display.

 

Many argue that it isn't fit for purpose, but this fails, as if care is taken, there are no issues, just that people need to remember the larger screens require greater care.

Edited by buzby
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest coz1873

I know we are getting into grey area's here, but, its a bit like buying a new car & the windscreen cracks when washing it by hand with a sponge. Its not designed for 'sponging', but its got to survive reasonable stresses/usage so you would still have a fight with the manufacturer.

 

I'd say more than just care is needed. I honestly placed the phone on a seat. My car seat actually, so a soft placement and surface. Drove for 10 minutes - Stopped - then picked it up & it was damaged.

 

The other part where they simply refuse to cover LCD screens can't be right either. They are pre-empting problems and dismissing their customers, regardless of the cause.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No LCDs ARE covered - it is just they're so reliable the bulk of claims that they are inherently faulty is usually wrong - it is external action that causes the problem. For example, a good many phones were showing lines down the screen, like tramlines - this was found to be NOT a screen fault, but a cracked ribbon cable supplying the video to the display. Because the cable moved when the phone opened/closed, it took some time to get the manufacturers to admit the cable loom was the problem and fix it.

 

Screens that look as though they're leaking black ink HAVE been stressed and as this is always post-purchase, it makes it easy for them to reject. At issue is proving a negative - how do you prove you didn't abuse it? This is why insurance does have its uses.....

Edited by buzby
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi coz1873,

 

Have you been able to get this resolved yet?

 

If not, feel free to email your details to us following the steps in our pinned thread here.

 

Once you've sent the email just let me know by updating your thread and I'll keep an eye out for it.

 

Thanks,

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
Guest coz1873

I know its a long time since the previous part of this mail thread but i'll add an update in case someone else has a problem and stumbles across this...

 

I did get my phone fixed and didn't pay for it. The comments by 'Buzby' were very ill-informed. I took legal advice and was told that 'It is not legal for any company to put a blanket exclusion on any part of any item they sell from their warranty'. They can refuse to fix/replace an item if they 'prove' that you broke it... Thats the key. If it breaks within 6 months then the damage is 'assumed to be a manufacturing fault'. Unless they prove to you that the item was abused/misshandled then they have to fix it. I had a similar fall out with Phones-4-U after the keyboard on my dads phone stopped working. It was a fight but in both cases I won.

 

Stick to your guns!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Misinformed? I don't think so!

Proving a negative is an impossibility - just how is a shop going to prove you didnt do something? The actuality is there is a high risk of failures caused by misuse. By all means throw a hissy fit, if the shop sticks to it's guns your only recourse is court. Make enough noise and they may be minded to replace with refurb if they cannot point to any tell-tale Indicators to prove abuse. Manufacturers seldom make phones inherently faulty, therefore it is with YOU to prove the problem to the satisfaction of the retailer not as you Ppear to believe, the other way round!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know its a long time since the previous part of this mail thread but i'll add an update in case someone else has a problem and stumbles across this...

 

I did get my phone fixed and didn't pay for it. The comments by 'Buzby' were very ill-informed. I took legal advice and was told that 'It is not legal for any company to put a blanket exclusion on any part of any item they sell from their warranty'. They can refuse to fix/replace an item if they 'prove' that you broke it... Thats the key. If it breaks within 6 months then the damage is 'assumed to be a manufacturing fault'. Unless they prove to you that the item was abused/misshandled then they have to fix it. I had a similar fall out with Phones-4-U after the keyboard on my dads phone stopped working. It was a fight but in both cases I won.

 

Stick to your guns!!!!!!!!!

 

I'm with Buzby on this one, your comments are not factually correct.

 

There is a difference between a fault and damage which you seem to have missed. LCD displays on phones don't shatter by themselves, the seller of the goods refused to replace your phone under warranty because there were no faulty components, you broke the phone, then you tried to pass off the damage you caused as a fault to get them to repair or replace it.

 

They were well within their rights to tell you they would not replace the phone.

 

Damage of goods accidental or otherwise is not something that will ever be covered under warranty, you might have got the companies in both cases to replace the goods for you, but I assume that this is because you kicked up a fuss or caused a nuisance to the extent that they decided it was easier to just replace the goods so that you would go away!

 

From a legal standpoint if a phone becomes faulty within six months of you purchasing it, the fault is assumed to be inherent at point of sale and legally the seller must repair or replace the goods unless they can show you've damaged them. Sitting on a phone until the screen breaks is not and never will be a fault!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with Buzby on this one, your comments are not factually correct.

 

There is a difference between a fault and damage which you seem to have missed. LCD displays on phones don't shatter by themselves, the seller of the goods refused to replace your phone under warranty because there were no faulty components, you broke the phone, then you tried to pass off the damage you caused as a fault to get them to repair or replace it.

 

They were well within their rights to tell you they would not replace the phone.

 

Damage of goods accidental or otherwise is not something that will ever be covered under warranty, you might have got the companies in both cases to replace the goods for you, but I assume that this is because you kicked up a fuss or caused a nuisance to the extent that they decided it was easier to just replace the goods so that you would go away!

 

From a legal standpoint if a phone becomes faulty within six months of you purchasing it, the fault is assumed to be inherent at point of sale and legally the seller must repair or replace the goods unless they can show you've damaged them. Sitting on a phone until the screen breaks is not and never will be a fault!

 

Please provide some form of evidence to back up your claims that an LCD cant just shatter by itself! As this is complete and utter twollocks!

 

The whole design is fragile and especially with the 5800 that has a flexible screen its more than likely to happen.

 

Also even if he did push slightly too hard on the screen and it broke then its not fit for purpose. As these screens are designed to take quite a hard prod on them due to the heavy handed approach of todays market, so therefore if it breaks during the first 12 months then thats covered.

 

This i also know as i got a 5800 replaced due to the screen cracking, and the chap in carphone warehouse also informed me that the first lot of screens were actually faulty and were cracking easily!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, shattering 'by itself' is complete and utter rubbish. It requires an external force. and since the device will be in the care of the owner the retailer can justly claim any such problem is the result of carelessness (or divide intervention, if you believe in that sort of thing).

 

Yes, a screen of this size will shatter if the the phone is bent. Are you arguing that the phone should not bend, ergo the fault is manufacturing because the casing was not strong enough? If so, then this is a different issue entirely.

 

Where there is a specification issue that result in cracking and this is acknowledged then there is no issue, it IS covered, and is no different from firmware issues that render many functions unusable until an update, reflashing is always offered.

 

As always, the usual report of a cracked screen is a result of the owner having it in a back pocket and sitting down. There is more of those, than complaints about self-cracking screens, therefore you need to ensure you do research to ensure there IS an acknowledged problem, rather than looking for a convenient scapegoat.

Edited by HSBCrusher
substituted a better word :-D
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know its a long time since the previous part of this mail thread but i'll add an update in case someone else has a problem and stumbles across this...

 

I did get my phone fixed and didn't pay for it. The comments by 'Buzby' were very ill-informed. I took legal advice and was told that 'It is not legal for any company to put a blanket exclusion on any part of any item they sell from their warranty'. They can refuse to fix/replace an item if they 'prove' that you broke it... Thats the key. If it breaks within 6 months then the damage is 'assumed to be a manufacturing fault'. Unless they prove to you that the item was abused/misshandled then they have to fix it. I had a similar fall out with Phones-4-U after the keyboard on my dads phone stopped working. It was a fight but in both cases I won.

 

Stick to your guns!!!!!!!!!

 

Hi coz1873,

 

It's certainly a fair while since this thread was started but it's great to hear that you've been able to get things sorted out.

 

Should you require any further assistance in the future then you're welcome to get in touch with the Web Relations Team by following the steps in our pinned thread which I link you to last year.

 

All the best.

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi I have just had the same scenario, My phone was about 2 months old, I actually had the phone in my hand, I was holding it when the screen broke, I entered a doctors surgery waiting room, looked at the time on my phone, looked again about half an hour later and it had broken.The phone had been in my hand the whole time. The dealer said no warrant because of physical neglect. What else could have caused my phone screen to crack. It was the inside and not the outside screen. I wonder how many times this happens and people just buy into the 'oh well I will get a new phone' . Perhaps it is a good way for phone sellers to make more money, The retailer could not even justify her reason just told me I must have dropped it over and over again. I do have a bee in my bonnet now because I do not like the fact that they insinuated I was lying. Any help just to put my own mind at ease why this may have happened before I buy a new phone. ( PS my teenage children drop there phones all the time and the screens do not break and I am so very careful and mine does haha) Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sandy01,

 

Welcome to CAG and thanks for making me aware of this matter.

 

It is unusual for a screen to break without any external pressure having been applied, however, I'm sure we can arrange a repair for you to get it back in working order again.

 

To enable to assist you with arranging this could you email us your details by following the information in our pinned thread here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?213340-Vodafone-Webteam-for-Customers-With-Problems?

 

Once you've sent it you'll receive an automated reply with a reference number. Could you update the thread with this so I can make sure it reaches us and I'll get back to you as soon as I can?

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...