Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax credit card - The ongoing story


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5313 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, i found this site yesterday and i'm very impressed as it is just what i was looking for.

 

Anyway on with the details, i have a halifax credit card that i have had for over 6 years the balance of which is £1200 ish (not as much as some on here but allbeit worth fighting for).

 

Now the interesting bit, when i opened my bank account with halifax some 6 years ago to my amazement i automatically recieved a credit card too :-o i dont remember signing for it or even them mentioning it, i can remember however phoning the branch to see why i had recieved a credit card through the post and not my current account card. Then last year myself and my missus went into the local branch to consolodate our debt (all of which is with halifax) into one easy loan. Once the 'banker' started looking for my credit card account on their system they couldn't find any record of it and it turned out that they had my name misspelt on their system. Anyway they wouldn't give us the loan probably because they would lose interest money by doing so idk?

 

Now i find myself here at this very informative and helpful website full of resources. I think i'm going to go down this path to try and get a copy of my signed agreement with halifax, if one exists that is. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

 

Ill keep this thread updated with my progress and if any of you wise folks have any advice for me it would be greatly appreciated.

 

Kind regards

T.A.C

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hello everyone, i found this site yesterday and i'm very impressed as it is just what i was looking for.

 

Anyway on with the details, i have a halifax credit card that i have had for over 6 years the balance of which is £1200 ish (not as much as some on here but allbeit worth fighting for).

 

Now the interesting bit, when i opened my bank account with halifax some 6 years ago to my amazement i automatically recieved a credit card too :-o i dont remember signing for it or even them mentioning it, i can remember however phoning the branch to see why i had recieved a credit card through the post and not my current account card. Then last year myself and my missus went into the local branch to consolodate our debt (all of which is with halifax) into one easy loan. Once the 'banker' started looking for my credit card account on their system they couldn't find any record of it and it turned out that they had my name misspelt on their system. Anyway they wouldn't give us the loan probably because they would lose interest money by doing so idk?

 

Now i find myself here at this very informative and helpful website full of resources. I think i'm going to go down this path to try and get a copy of my signed agreement with halifax, if one exists that is. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

 

Ill keep this thread updated with my progress and if any of you wise folks have any advice for me it would be greatly appreciated.

 

Kind regards

T.A.C

You will need to go down the CCA request route first. Using CPR31.16 is usually for when they are threatening legal action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah now it makes more sense to me thank you, i thihnk i may have some what overloaded my brain a little. I've read so much i wasn't entirely sure which step to take.

 

So i need to send them a cca request first and go from there, ill have a look around for that letter on the forums again. Thanks:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah now it makes more sense to me thank you, i thihnk i may have some what overloaded my brain a little. I've read so much i wasn't entirely sure which step to take.

 

So i need to send them a cca request first and go from there, ill have a look around for that letter on the forums again. Thanks:)

Yes CCA request first, send first class recorded signed for. Enclose £1 postal order, made out to the creditor. Print your name do not sign.

 

Letter below.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

With reference to the alleged debt to your company, this letter is a formal request of true copy of a signed and dated credit agreement for the above account number, under the terms and conditions of section 78(1) of the CCA act 1974. I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £1.00

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit.

 

I enclose a postal order no xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

They have 12 working days + 2 days to respond. That is the time limit.

 

If you get no response in this time, there is a dispute letter that you can use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all again, im a bit delayed in sending off my cca request. Could anyone tell me which number on the postal order i have to put in the letter please.

 

Thanks

There is a postal order number individual to each order ( 10-987654321 )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would this be the voucher id printed on the reciept ? 1045919993

 

Thanks again and sorry for seeming a little dumb its just theres various numbers written on the postal order and i want to make sure i note the correct one.

Edited by t.a.c
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Would this be the voucher id printed on the reciept ? 1045919993

 

Thanks again and sorry for seeming a little dumb its just theres various numbers written on the postal order and i want to make sure i note the correct one.

Thats the one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thumbnail 1.

 

Confirms that an application form is an application form

 

So if that's a credit card agreement---where do you sign?

 

Could be anyone's copy.

 

 

-------------------------

 

Thumbnail 2.

 

If I was being silly and accepting what is written in the long oblong box,then I could say that those few words therein contained is the credit agreement as it is enclosed and leads nowhere especially as beneath it in large type is ..

 

Halifax Credit Card-Conditions of use

which leads onto 13.6 sections

 

A credit agreement is a credit agreement and Credit Card Conditions of Use are Credit Card Conditions of Use--

 

A silly arguement I know but certainly no sillier that the drivel that the credit card companies keep trying to foist on us in the way of explanations!

CREDITCARDLETTER-cropped.jpg

CREIDTAGREEMENTP1 snippet.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

t.a.c re your CCA request you may end up with what I had something they call a "reconstituted version of the executed agreement".

All this is, is a nice typed page or two of total bumpf that is not anywhere near a correct and "true" copy of any credit agreement, ususally sent with a set of generic T & Cs. Just a heads up but thats what they seem to be sending everyone on CA requests at present (from reading other threads), you will end up having to ask again and at the end of 12+2 send them a SAR that normally gets their attention .... :D

It will be intruiging to see what they send you as you say you already have the original agreement/ application, bet they trip themselves up .... ;-)

 

Anyhow subbing with intrest

"I am no Solicitor but deal with REAL hard case lawyers everyday, this gives me the strength to deal with the lightweight idiots that are thrown at me everyday by DCAS :D"

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is quite an old area of the Act. What the OC's have picked up on is that they can supply a copy of an agreement, failing to recognise the word true.

 

The act allows them to copy the executed agreement, then by hand as there were no photocopiers, but it has to be a true copy, word by word and term by term. Obviously such documents can omit signature and date of signature, as it would be impossible for the copy to be signed. So theoretically, they could indeed copy the agreement by hand, but why do that these days with photocopiers available.

 

The fact is that they cannot easily lay their hands on the agreements, if at all, so they reconstruct, in the hope that most will accept this. The OFT is clear that a mere reconstruction of what an agreement may have looked like, is not acceptable.

 

They also seem to be focussing down on just s78 for credit cards. The rest of the act obviously comes into play, as this is the statute under which the agreement or contract is drawn up. A point within the act states that the agreement is not executed until both parties have signed. This is common to all contracts and indeed in normal life, if one party does not sign the contract, then there is no agreement to supply or pay for goods and services. If you supply goods or services without a properly signed contract ( executed), then expect severe problems come payment time. It does not appear important though in postings on this forum, but is an important part of the CCA 1974. It was also important enough for Benion to include in the act and to comment on its intention at a later date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is quite an old area of the Act. What the OC's have picked up on is that they can supply a copy of an agreement, failing to recognise the word true.

 

The act allows them to copy the executed agreement, then by hand as there were no photocopiers, but it has to be a true copy, word by word and term by term. Obviously such documents can omit signature and date of signature, as it would be impossible for the copy to be signed. So theoretically, they could indeed copy the agreement by hand, but why do that these days with photocopiers available.

 

The fact is that they cannot easily lay their hands on the agreements, if at all, so they reconstruct, in the hope that most will accept this. The OFT is clear that a mere reconstruction of what an agreement may have looked like, is not acceptable.

 

They also seem to be focussing down on just s78 for credit cards. The rest of the act obviously comes into play, as this is the statute under which the agreement or contract is drawn up. A point within the act states that the agreement is not executed until both parties have signed. This is common to all contracts and indeed in normal life, if one party does not sign the contract, then there is no agreement to supply or pay for goods and services. If you supply goods or services without a properly signed contract ( executed), then expect severe problems come payment time. It does not appear important though in postings on this forum, but is an important part of the CCA 1974. It was also important enough for Benion to include in the act and to comment on its intention at a later date.

 

Hi Vint,

 

At what point, if any, can a signed application form be termed an executed agreement.

 

My application form is signed by me and also has a small box headed ..

 

'For Visa Centre Use Only'

Signed on behalf of the Society

 

This is then signed and dated.

 

By any stretch of a sensible person's [exclude Halifax from this equation] could this be deemed a signed and executed agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vint,

 

At what point, if any, can a signed application form be termed an executed agreement.

 

My application form is signed by me and also has a small box headed ..

 

'For Visa Centre Use Only'

Signed on behalf of the Society

 

 

This is then signed and dated.

 

 

 

By any stretch of a sensible person's [exclude Halifax from this equation] could this be deemed a signed and executed agreement?

 

 

In my opinion, an application form is always that, a pre contract document. Others and some judges do dissagree. They should then send you a copy of the executed agreement, within 7 days of execution.

 

I have had a look at your agreement and it is also headed Credit card agreement, so could arguably be ok. The prescribed terms are also there. The only thing that is missing, is the reverse of the form that is referred to on the application. They would need this as one document, if they went to court. Are you still persuing PPI claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't sent them the PPI claim yet as I am waiting to see what materialises with my claim for repayment of late charges which they tell me they will not be paying back.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/217048-how-much-youre-aving.html

 

The multiple agreement path is going to be the strongest way of dealing with the 'is it,isn't it' question of an enforceable agreement when we get down to the nitty gritty of the argument.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Halifax Credit Card which as usual increases every month due to charges as i am struggling to make payments required on it. I have seen and heard the adverts for if you took the card out before 2007 the agrement may be unenforceable. What I would like to know is how is this possible and if it is how do i go about finding out..

 

Any help and advice would be appreciated....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...