Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You probably do need to ignore it, but show it to us just in case. Cover up your name, address and anything that could ID you like your car reg. HB
    • Hi all! I've now had a "final notification letter" through from ECP. I assume I should continue to ignore this, but is there likely any action I need to take? Do you need to see a copy of the letter? Thanks
    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCN received from New Generation Parking


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4715 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have read this by searching but stupidly I too wrote back to this company before reading the site.

 

I tried to appeal and yesterday received a letter back saying I did not appeal properly. I didn't pay first then appeal, to be honest I thought it would have been stupid to pay because then you obviously won't get your money back in any case.

 

Anyway, here is what I wrote to them explaining what happened.

 

“NGP

37B New Cavendish Street

London

W1G 8JR

 

Reference - *****

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I am writing in relation to a parking ticket I received yesterday. Notice number *** issued on**** at ****. My car is ****.

 

I wish to appeal and I will outline the reasons why. I am a new tenant in the development and I moved in on ****. I was informed by the letting agent ‘***’ based *** of the parking bay to use although they were not 100% sure. I was not able to double check because the caretaker who maintains the site does not work on weekends. Furthermore, I tried to register my car to the bay on the NGP website but as you know you cannot register without knowing the exact bay.

 

As soon as was possible on *** 29th I contacted the caretaker and was advised of the correct bay to be in. I returned home on my lunch break to move my car at about 12:15 but the ticket had already been issued.

 

I have spoken to NGP and I was advised that we both need to write a letter of appeal in, the letter from *** is attached.

 

As you can understand this was a genuine mistake for which I am not responsible as I only parked where I was advised to by the letting agent. As I mentioned I now know the exact space in which my car is now parked, and I have also registered my car on the NGP website.

 

I hope you will take this as a one off error and take this into consideration when dealing with the appeal.

 

Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Warmest Regards”

 

And here is the letter from the letting agent of the property.

 

“NGP

37B New Cavendish Street

London

W1G 8JR

 

30 June 2009

 

To Whom It May Concern,

 

RE: - Parking fine ****, issued on *****.

*************************.

 

I am writing regarding a parking fine that was issued to ****, car registration *** ***

*** moved into **** on *** 27th **** 2009, a property that Keylet manage. We had previously had tenants in the property for over 3 years, and as a result did not have the car park space number noted on our file. As it was a weekend the caretaker was not available to advise us of the correct space, we therefore called the previous tenants who advised they believed the space number to be 62. Unfortunately this was incorrect, and as a result ***was issued with a fine.

 

***is now fully aware which space is the correct number, and had a visitor space been available until he was able to clarify the correct space, he would have parked there to avoid confusion. This was a one-off incident that occurred due to there being no-one available on the weekend to confirm the correct space, I therefore believe that it would be unfair to impose a fine on ***due to these circumstances, and can fully reassure you that no further incidents will occur. ***spoke with the caretaker as soon as he was available on ** 30th **, and upon finding the correct space number, returned to****on his lunch break to move his car to the correct space, I am now advised that he has also registered his car with NGP to the correct space.

 

I trust that you will consider the above when dealing with ****appeal.

 

Should you have any further queries or require any more information please do not hesitate to contact me on ****or by email ****

 

Yours sincerely

 

****”

 

I mean the obvious point is I might have jinxed myself by writing in the first place (drat!) and also that it wasn't my fault I was told the wrong space.

 

I would just be really grateful for some advice please if possible.

 

The fine is

£65 if paid within 7 days

8-14 days is £75

15-28 £125

after 28 days £150.

 

The letting agent who misinformed me also told me they would not pay the fine for me. I would have to pay, and if an appeal was successful great, if not I would have to appeal to the letting agent for my money back! Obviously not acceptable.

 

Anyway, any advice would be so appreciated.

 

Thanks very much indeed

Edited by barrybarry
Link to post
Share on other sites

... I hope you will take this as a one off error and take this into consideration when dealing with the appeal ...

You could use that phraseology when walking through the underpass at Waterloo station at midnight, perhaps the knife-wielding muggers might not take your wallet.

 

There is NO FINE. Pay them nothing, zilch, zip, nada. Ignore all their rubbish letters until and unless they issue a court claim. And keep a decent set of boltcutters handy in case they try to (illegally) clamp your car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, do now what you should have done from the start:

 

• do not pay

• do not contact them

• there is no appeal process - nno private company will turn down profit

ignore any threatening junkmail from them or their powerless debt collectors

• they will give up and go away

 

It's a mail [problem]. Private companies cannot fine people, only recoup their actual losses. Your actions have cost them nothing, but then they wouldn't be in business if they stopped handing out fake parking tickets.

 

Now forget about it and get on with your life. All you have to do is ignore some junkmail that will come through your letterbox.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for the advice so far David and Al, I have read similar advice on other threads, just wanted the reassurance.

 

Could I please have clarification on the following points though please?

 

"Ignore all their rubbish letters until and unless they issue a court claim."

 

"And keep a decent set of boltcutters handy in case they try to (illegally) clamp your car."

 

Could and would they issue a court claim? How would I know if this was genuine? What would I do then?

 

Finally, could and would they clamp my car? My car is now registered to the correct bay and it is in in a secure fob entry underground car park under my flat. If it were one day clamped what would I do? Similarly if it were towed, would I simply report it as stolen?

 

Thanks very much, so helpful and reassuring so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chances of a court claim are infinitesimal. There's just no money in it - for a measly £100 they'd have to spend a lot of time preparing their case, actually go to court and even then they've no chance of winning. Even if they did win, they might not get the cash even then.

 

The odd court case we see are for purely egotistical reasons - just a marketing tool to persuade others to pay. They're hopeless at it though.

 

Comprehensive defence available in the worst case scenario though.

 

It's an offence to clamp with no warning signs and also as a result of alleged outstanding debt (blackmail). You'd phone the police if that happened, but there's little chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Al, I will let everyone know if I get any amusing letters though!

 

I feel really bad for those who do pay and or feel intimidated, even though now I'm fairly confident it's a sham and I will forget about it, it's not a very nice feeling to hang over you!

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi BarryBarry,

 

Could you please let me know how you got on with New Generation Parking and it's cowboy letters? I have just got one for parking outside Pizza Hut (ate in there too) at Red Dragon Centre, Cardiff. I am more than a little worried about it and need to know that ignoring the letters is what I should do. Certainly can't afford the £60 fine.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barrybarry hasn't been on the forums since November 2009 which is usually a good sign that having successfully ignored the PPC, he didn't have a need to come back and post on CAG. It would be nice if people posted back with a conclusion, but unfortunately it is not usually the case.

 

Stick with the ignore route and it is by far the easiest for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Desimodo,

 

Let me throw the same question back at you - how did you get on with NGP and your ticket?

I too was given a PCN from NGP for parking in an unmarked pavement area by the entrance to a block in Cardiff which I can't afford but I'm loathe to ignore in case it comes back to haunt me in the form of a bigger fine or worse bailiffs knocking on the door.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Desimodo,

 

Let me throw the same question back at you - how did you get on with NGP and your ticket?

I too was given a PCN from NGP for parking in an unmarked pavement area by the entrance to a block in Cardiff which I can't afford but I'm loathe to ignore in case it comes back to haunt me in the form of a bigger fine or worse bailiffs knocking on the door.

 

Let me correct you. It's not a "fine", it's an invoice. For "bailiffs to come bollocking on your door" the case would have to go to court (very unlikely) you lose (very, very unlikely) and then you fail to pay whatever the judge orders within 28 days, That's such a remote possibility it's not worth worrying about.

 

Perhaps you are thinking of debt collectors, who are just powerless private citizens with no more power than you or I to demand money off people. Just ignore these clowns.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Desimodo,

 

Let me throw the same question back at you - how did you get on with NGP and your ticket?

I too was given a PCN from NGP for parking in an unmarked pavement area by the entrance to a block in Cardiff which I can't afford but I'm loathe to ignore in case it comes back to haunt me in the form of a bigger fine or worse bailiffs knocking on the door.

 

NGP have been known to clamp for unpaid invoices so beware if you park at the same block again. Clamping for an unpaid charge is illegal but once they have the boot on the balls in their court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NGP have been known to clamp for unpaid invoices so beware if you park at the same block again. Clamping for an unpaid charge is illegal but once they have the boot on the balls in their court.

 

Could they clamp you outside your own house for the very same reason - surely it wouldn't be an overt step that's just a little too far for these shameless crooks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...