Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shocking costs created by Tory led Government in 2012. Taxpayers brace for £100bn money-printing bill – as George Osborne says it’s ‘not my responsibility’ MSN WWW.MSN.COM  
    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can They Take It? - Please Help Anyone>


one20
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5337 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I really need some advice on a predicament I have:

 

Last year my house got reposessed and now I am in receipt of letters from the lenders' solicitors. I have asked for details of the deficit, how they sold the house, how much it was valued at etc and they have replied after about 6 weeks of my letter.

 

They sent me a reply to the effect that they acknowledged my letter. Sent a bundle of papers which had valuations etc, detailed when the account went into arrears, when the house was reposessed and the fact that they were unable to advise if there was any mortgage protection on the account. and then just the usual, we look forward to hearing from you..

 

I have yet to respond to them. I'm employed fulltime and my ex (party to the mortgage) is not.

 

I have the option to take voluntary redundancy and the amount received would be less than the defecit the lenders have declared.

 

My question is, would the lender be able to take that money, or would it be dependant on when I receive it and when (if at all) they apply for either an attachment of earnings order or apply to make me bankrupt? If it is a matter of 'when' or 'if it is timed correctly' then I know that there is a certain amount of time litigation can take,

 

In a Nutshell - i've already lost my house and there is no point me trying to make a clean start with the VR payment if they're just going to take the whole lot! :(

 

any advice would be highly appreciated, i've asked friends, but no one seems to know the answer.

 

 

Ps the house was valued at roughly 40k less than what it was bought by us (2 years prior). I believe it was highly undervalued, but they sent some other valuations of 'similar' properties in the region.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello One 20

 

Sorry to hear your news , im not able to help you, however

i think you need to post this in the Repossessions dept as

there you will have people looking who can advise you better

and you will get a faster response than in the Legals.

Hope things turn out ok for you soon

 

Wishing you all the best

 

Tonks:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi one20

 

Sorry, but I can't answer your questions either, however you may find this site useful for house valuations/comparisons;

 

UK property for sale, flats to rent, house prices - Zoopla!

 

Who knows, yours is probably there. I think the 'last sold' prices come from the land registry records but I doubt anybody told porkies about how much it sold for.

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tonka99, Robcag thanks for your responses.

 

Checked the link, and a house sold for a lot more than what they sold mine for - so that might be something to go off?

 

Saintly_1 thanks for moving the thread.

 

I have since spoke to a few 'legal advisors' and one suggested to make an offer to the solicitors for full and final settlement, and then once this is agreed to apply for VR? Problem is 2 fold:

 

a) I don't know what to offer them and if they will accept

b) the whole thing would be dependant on firstly me getting accepted for VR (as I would use part of the money to pay them), and secondly on me getting it after them agreeing to an amount - any mistiming and it could all go wrong, ie I may not have money to pay them with, or if they catch sight of it prior to agreement of an offer for f+f - they may change their mind?

 

one totally confused and desperate one20. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, how much are they saying you owe ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, it might be a good idea to send them a subject access request - with the fee of £10 in the form of a postal order (don't send a cheque, it has your bank account number on it!). On the back of the postal order write "fee for subject access request not to be used as payment". Take a photocopy of both sides of the postal order and also keep a copy of the subject access request letter. Send by recorded delivery and get the signature receipt from the royalmail website.

 

Wait and see what comes back - you should get all the information associated with the mortgage including the "finer" details of how the sale was conducted.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Ell-enn, sorry for being thick here, but do you mean to send the solicitors a SAR or the lenders?

 

I recently wrote back to the solicitors and asked for them to clarify a 'miscellaneous cost' which amounts to over 1400 pounds. Also asked them to clarify whether or not they have contact the other party to the mortgage - ie my ex. I'm considering that I may make them an offer of full and final settlement (maybe 10-12% of the toal amount they claim is owed?) I'm hoping that if they accept, I can then go ahead with the VR and carry on with my life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, you would SAR the lender.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply Ell-enn

 

Do you think that I should do this regardless of the fact that I feel I will make them an offer for full and final settlement? or would you say that they two are unrelated and I should do it anyway?

 

Also if I do make an offer of f+f would I do it on a 'non prejudice' basis? (so they couldn't hold me to it, in case I was unable to get the monies) do I send such an offer letter to the lenders or the solicitors?

 

thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do it anyway - it may throw up some info that would back up your reduced offer ;)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ellen/Others,

 

after much negotiation, i've received the below from the solicitors.

 

To me the letter doesn't seem "robust" enough, can anyone advise? when I asked for them to add in "full and final settelement" I was told that they (the solicitors) had been advised by the bank, that they could not ammend the standard letter. Now they're asking me to provide what I want inserting in the letter, and they will 'run it by the bank'.

 

here is what they've sent as the pre-settlement letter:

 

We can confirm that our client is prepared to accept a payment of £x to conclude your liability in this matter. In support of this our client will provide a covenant that on receipt of this amount they will not seek further repayment of any form from you in respect of this account (by which it is meant all monies due to our client under the mortgage formerly charged to the property known as X Address).

 

Please note that the arrangement is subject to payment of the aforementioned sum being received at this office on or before X. Cheques should be made payable to XXX and quote the reference XXX on the reverse.

 

Further, the above agreement does not in any way prejudice out client's rights to seek recovery of the remaining balance from all other parties to the mortgage (including guarantors if applicable).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly - are you able to afford the amount they are asking for?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...