Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Link Financial and MBNA Card debt


HP Mum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3009 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

An update - 3 years later !!

I have had NO contact from mbna or Link since December 2010.

 

However - I have just checked my Experian Credit Report - and Link (mbna) have registered the alleged account in default.

Default date of end 2008.

 

I don't want to open a can of worms and get talking to Link again really - but I very importantly need to improve my Credit Report.

Who do I write to and how do I get the Link Default removed immediately from my Report ???

 

I did write to Link 3 years ago the following:

DataProtection Act, section 10.

Pleasenote you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to thisaccount with immediate effect. This means you must remove all informationregarding this account from your own internal records and from my records withany third parties and credit reference agencies.

Pleaseconfirm that you have complied with my request under section 10 of the DataProtection Act.

Clearly Link paid NO attention.

They can not collect on the debt, yet are ruining my credit rating by posting this on Experian. I have not checked any other Reports, but assume it is on others too.

Advice on how to handle this is greatly appreciated. Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Will this do as a letter ?

And is there any action I can take when a dca is in breach of Section 10 ????

 

Dear Sirs,

Account no / Your ref

 

You are in possession of my previous correspondence dating back to 2010 - I gave you StatutoryNotice - under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to the account named above with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any third parties and credit reference agencies.

 

You are currently in breach of this Notice. Please ensure that ALL information regarding this account is removed from ALL credit reference agencies and other third parties and from your own internal records, as requested.

Please the confirm that you have complied with my request undersection 10 of the Data Protection Act by return letter.

Yours,

xxx

 

Yours sincerely

Edited by HP Mum
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HP Mum,

 

There doesn't seem to be as many caggers around like there used and I guess some that were subbing to this thread three years ago have unsubscribed because there hasn't been any further postings from you. I'm still subbing to most of the original one's when I joined CAG and rarely get any notifications from them.

 

I came to the conclusion that eventually the DCA's just give up and move on to someone else who gives them less grief!

 

Then you get the odd one that comes out of the woodwork and chances their arm again. Is it coming close to being statute barred by any chance?

 

I'm not an expert on CRA's, however I think if the debt has been purchased in full from the original creditor, then the new owners do have the authority to continue updating the the agencies.

 

Maybe someone else will come along and advise differently or agree with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Afternoon

 

I am trying to tie up loose ends.

I have heard nothing from mbna or Link for years.

I never acknowledged the debt and I sincerely doubt it was enforceable or they would have taken me to court by now.

I sent Link/mbna a: S10 Notice To Cease Processing of Data

But they have still added this debt to my CRA file.

What can I do now ?

 

The default date was very end 2008 - so it will be statute barred end of 2014 (I think).

But I need a better CRA now.

If I write to them - what kind of strong letter/formal legal letter do I need to write to ensure they remove their details from my name.

Or do I just send another S10 ?

 

Any thoughts ?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi john1975 - they are indeed !!!!

 

However, whilst you are on here - have you read up on the CPR process?

 

I was completely amazed at the wonderful advice I received on this site at a very fearful moment

- when a Notts Claim (on behalf of Halifax) had been issued to me.

 

The words CPR meant nothing to me then.

 

 

But 6 weeks later when the Claimant decided not to pursue the Claim I was super grateful some wonderful people

had held my hand thru the whole step by step process.

 

 

I may be 5 years out of date with some of the amendments but following this path certainly worked for me then and I hope it does for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no we don't delete anything like that

its good info but sadly out of date

its on one of HP mums other threads.

 

 

jon you need to concerntrate on your claim.

 

 

CCa is the way to go

as its a LEGAL REQUIREMENT for them to reply

CPR can be totally ignored

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres never any direct link between the defaulted date and the SB date

whatever 'they write' cannot alter SB.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I just thought I would update this thread.

 

 

mbna disappeared off my cra end 2014.

Neither a dca (Link) nor mbna have written since.

So whilst I didn't have to fight mbna in court, the account is SB now - So I guess it would be correct to say I won !!

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Link Financial and MBNA Card debt
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...