Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap As far as am aware the loan was paid of some 8 years ago
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Orange/Arrow/Fredrickson


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5208 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As this is BC, it is worth a click on the exclamation mark in the red triangle to get the attention of the site team (if you don't get a response)

 

basicly BC are trying to get out of sending anything

 

If you don't get any more comments, it would be worthwhile responding to BC along the lines of your not having any knowledge of any amount lawfully due to his client so of course you need all of the documents that you have requested to be able to conduct your defence

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You obviously sent one of Martin's excellent pre court CPR letters....there isn't really any way of responding to it....you could now await their court claim !! or as a possible use a CPR31.16 request to reveal....something like the notice of assignment or the deed of assignment....it has been used successfully in court for things like getting the agreement, but it could be used as a possible tool to get them to reveal any specific paperwork you MIGHT use in a future case against them - have a read - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html - this is one cagger who used it successfully - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/165349-smt37-morgan-stanley-goldfish-3.html#post2119750

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes agreed.

If they do now go on to file a claim,its something that you can draw the Courts attention to.

You could actually respond to let them know that you DO believe that what you have asked for is relevant,and in the absence of them letting you have it,will seek draft directions for an order to get it,at the appropriate stage.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its up to you.

Guidance from the FOS says that where able you should maintain payments.

However,they know that only a Court can force you to do this-or give them legitimate enforcement to collect.

Let them put THEIR money where their mouth is.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Eventually had a response, from Bryan carter though not Orange. They have included what they are referring to as 'account documents'. It is a statement of account from opening in 1999 until closed 2006 and it shows a closing balance of £200 ish.

 

I've had no reply at all to my SAR, do I need to reply to BC or should I be sending something to Orange as they are well out of time on this now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO No No NO No !!!!

 

What ever you do don't stop..... I had exactly the same scenario and ended up taking them to court, even though they were claiming all along that they had evidence and were "confident of winning".... they were so "confident" that they didn't even attend !

 

The SAR is the trigger, if they are not replying chances are they have nothing to send you, therefore unenforceable and a straight victory with costs to you for your time/inconvenience/stress etc etc

Did you receive a pac code when you changed over suppliers ? if you did then case closed, mobile companies will not release these unless an account is nil balanced.

 

It turns out, there are thousands of people all over the country being sent out these demands for payment on primarily past "ORANGE" accounts that do not exist in financial terms.

I guess a substantial amount of people will just be tempted to think " I must owe it " and simply pay up, but if you challenge it to the full you will find that Orange and it's henchmen will retreat back under the excrement from where they came.

I not only won, but I was awarded full costs and a little to cover my time, it was a great feeling banking their cheque !

This does also send out a very clear message to everybody who is looking to change providers, DON'T USE ORANGE !

 

Best of luck, keep up the good fight.

 

J,

Consumer Action Group, the forum for all of us.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have not provided any response to your SAR, then you should write a LETTER BEFORE ACTION (send recorded enclosing a copy of your original SAR letter) - an example of an LBA here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/178660-blackheath-loans.html#post2016194 give them 7 days to respond, if they fail to respond then you could either report them to the ICO (which could take ages) or take them to court to comply - (examples here) - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/49571-havinastella-lloyds-tsb-3.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/200771-starting-court-claim-sar.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/204306-fox-cap1-dpa-sar.html

 

And this one from the ICO too - http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/taking_a_case_to_court.pdf

 

Even if they hold NO information on you, then they have to tell you that, however my feeling is if this is an account from 2006, then they must have information on you...if you were paying Orange in 2006, then to comply (I think - please correct me if i'm wrong on this) with money laundering laws and accounting regulations they need to hold the information for at least 6 years...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It turns out, there are thousands of people all over the country being sent out these demands for payment on primarily past "ORANGE" accounts that do not exist in financial terms.

 

I'm not clear in what you are saying. That they are sending out financial claims that are fabricated? (eg are spurious and never existed?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chasing non-compliance is not anything you can usuefully achieve, only as part of a different action and you can advise the court their inability to provide the details as part of your SAR (you DID pay the fee for it?).

 

It is the ICO that pursues not compliance issues, not the data subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account is in dispute. Their client has been asked to provide substantiate their claims and has failed to comply with a SAR. You will not be dealing with any third parties in this matter, and suggest they pass the matter back to their clients for their urgent attention,

 

Make sure your £10 was not credited to your account by 'mistake' (often a useful ploy).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did receive my PAC code, I didn't really want to pursue them into courts for non compliance of the SAR, is this my only course of action?

 

You could try emailing Orange at [email protected] (from the Data Protection sticky in the telecoms section).

 

It looks like a previous cagger did this and received a reply in a matter of hours. I'd suggest advising you've sent a SAR previously, attach a copy of this SAR if possible and see if they can assist.

 

The courts and ICO will probably take months, I occassionally see ICO complaints about my employer; it usually takes the ICO between 3 & 6 months to pass details of a complaint about non compliance on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Human writes.....

 

I have personel experience with orange for this. Didn't receive the response to SAR from Orange for few months and an e-mail to [email protected] and also copied to [email protected] brought me response in 2 days. This is

what I sent on the e-mail

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I made a subject access request (copies of the letter and royal mail proof of the delivery is attached) to Orange under data protection act 1998. Along with the request letter, I sent a maximum statutory fee of £10 (royal mail postal order receipts attached).I have waited for the maximum time of 40 days for the response, however until today I haven’t heard anything back. One of my colleagues suggested that before contacting Information Commissioners Office trying with your department.

I have followed all the requirements for the subject access request to Orange and would request again to please provide me the requested information asap. Or I am afraid to say that I won’t have any other option than to start the legal proceedings.

Let me know if you require any further information in this regard and I hope to hear back soon.

 

Yours faithfully,

Dannysdad

 

 

I would suggest trying the same!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...