Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Is this a new parking event or have you posted about it before please? HB
    • Hi folks, The keeper received correspondence today from DCBL.  The keeper has received previous correspondence from (Possibly) Parking Eye and Debt Recovery Plus, all of which has been ignored with zero contact with either company. The keeper has moved house twice since the original PCN but has kept DVLA informed of every move and V5 updated accordingly. The driver recalls entering the car park but didn't see any signs indicating payment required. The drivers friend happened to be in the same car park a few days after original PCN was received. Friend is a truck driver and said there is a sign but at truck windscreen height. Driver was in a small vehicle and, due to being careful as to where they were driving, did not see the sign. Original paperwork has been lost while moving but keeper still has scans of paperwork from Debt Recovery Plus. Driver was on site for approximately one hour after a long drive and was resting. After having read previous cases on here, is it still safe to ignore? 1 Date of the infringement 15th September 2020   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Unsure    3 Date received A/A 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] A/A 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Driver recalls there was a screenshot of the reg plate, but it wasn’t a very good one.  6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up A/A  7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye?   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] MFG ESSO Cobham Gravesend  DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf
    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Concerned v MBNA


rondodiver
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4453 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all,

 

been reading the various threads around here for a little while and have decided to take the bull by the horns and tackle those jokers at MBNA, the basic story is they upped the interest rate to 34.9%, whilst at first I wasn't concerned as they have done it before many times but a phone call later and down it went again, this time they have stood their ground and refuse to budge with absolutely no explanation other than the standard cr*P. So this is what I have done so far

 

1 Made complaint by phone (Failed :-x)

 

2 Wrote a nice letter (Failed :-x) Got standard reply

 

3 Wrote a slightly more forceful letter (Failed :-x) Got "go away we ain't changing letter if u aint happy we will issue final response blah blah etc"

 

4 Decided in the meantime to CCA them after reading various threads

 

5 Have also sent another letter to them stating unless they reduce rate issue final response and I will forward to FSO

 

6 No response to CCA to date so I have sent the Account in dispute letter hope I got the dates right or I will look as numpty as them :D

 

Basically that is it no reply on CCA as yet, that was requested June 8, also stopped paying (eek) never done that before (Knowingly anyway) so after reading the threads I am waiting for the backlash now. As a matter of interest the Card is from 1997

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

1997 eh.. good chance they don't have it.. not impossible but a good chance.

 

Trading Standards been informed of the CCA failure i hope.

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not reported to Trading Standards yet just taking things a bit at a time at the moment not sure if that would do anything though. I certainly will be reporting them to the OFT though, again not sure what use that would do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT are finally taking notice. Might have to wait a long time before they ever come down hard on the big players but they are starting to tackle the DCA tactics:

 

The Office of Fair Trading: OFT imposes requirements on 1st Credit over debt collection practices

The Office of Fair Trading: OFT imposes requirements on Mackenzie Hall to improve handling of disputed debts

 

I'd get the complaint in to TS sooner rather than later and also do a SAR when you can as that allows up to 40 days for compliance and the ICO take quite a while to look at complaints re SAR failure.

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!!! MBNA have upped my rate to 34.9% as I was a few days late with some payments last year because the payment date was a few days before my pay day. I pay minimum payment in full every month and have never completely missed one.

 

i called and asked them to review and some complete :-x on the phone just said rather patronisingly "no sorry, the only rate available to you is a higher one"!!! ...As if I would say "cool - whack it up!!"

 

I will try and do what you're doing and see what happens!

 

Its just extortionate!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All

 

Just a quick update and some advice if at all possible, I haven't received any CCA yet or any replys at all regarding this. I have sent the account in dispute letter and yet have still had a late payment charge and interest added. I have had the final response letter regarding the extorniate interest rate, which will now go to the FSO as an official complaint. What really is my next step, do I remind them that they are in default by sending another letter or sit tight and wait, haven't heard a dickie bird regarding the dispute. I am ssuming at this stage they don't have a copy. Do I really need to SAR them yet as I know I have not incurred any changes until now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like I spoke too soon lol letter from Matin today saying account was in arrears which as the account is in dispute it cant be. Also got a phone call but that was soon finished when I explained that everything must be in writing only.

 

Any ideas on the next step please would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All

 

Latest update, starting to get the odd phone call now but I am able to screen my calls so this doesn't cause me any real issues there.

 

I have sent a reminder about the disputed account and also copies of the letters previousley sent requesting the CCA but still nothing to date they are just totally ignoring these letters.

 

Have today posted my complaint to the FSO we shall see how that goes.

 

Sending off the SAR this week as well as it seems that this may be the only way to flush out the CCA if indeed they have it, as they haven't sent it would it be stupidity to think they haven't got one ?

 

Would it be worth considering a F&F on the basis that without the CCA it is unenforceable therefore I can be rid of this sooner and relax again ?

 

On a note as to what started this i.e Interest rate increases I was looking into the Unfair Trading Regulations and wondered whether a 100% increase could be deemed as unfair (in my opinion it is) and whether these regulations would cover it.

 

Any comments appreciated as always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Done the dive about 4 times and the viz was always very good (well as good as it can be at that depth with a huge torch :))

 

Anyway quick question Still no CCA from these people and now sent a reminder on the back of them requesting payments so have reminded them of the dispute and their obligations (clearly this will be ignored) however they are now trying to contact me by phone about 5 times a day at the moment and moved onto actually leaving a message, although my phone automatically rejects unknown private and non contact list numbers does this still count as harrasment, is it worth still sending the harrasment letter ?. I have a log of every time the call is rejected.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think a court wouldn't count it as harassement as they never manage to speak to you. The court would say they have a legitimate right to keep trying. Send the letter nonetheless, you never know :)

 

How long have they had the CCA now?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might just do that to try a provoke some sort of response.

 

They have had the CCA request since 11th June when they signed for it and dispute letter 30th June. I have had absolutley no acknowledgement whatsoever of either letters, I also sent a reminder last week which was also signed for on 3rd Aug

Link to post
Share on other sites

You sent the CCA request on 11 June so they had until 25th (12 days plus 2 for post) to reply. So they were in default after this (as you said). However, a month after that, the default becomes an offence - they have been in that situation for 2 weeks. They have been unable to enforce the agreement since 25 June. Sorry for the confusion.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice rondodiver

 

PS in case anyone in interested - I have attached a picture or the Rondo (the picture in the article is wrong as it assumes the ship is straight when it is in fact bent)

Edited by steven4064

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All

 

Received confirmation from the FSO now and they may take about 2 months to investigate the interest rate hike, however I have a case number and at least they seem to be doing something.

 

Nothing from MBNA regarding my CCA request, only a couple of letters reminding me my account is in arrears. They seem to be just totally ignoring my letters completely. I have already sent a reminder that the account is in dispute should I now send another reminder ? or just sit back and play the waiting game and see what their next move is. The latest letter did elude to legal action and CRA information in a wooly sort of way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok received a another reminder this morning plus the threat of legal action and default registerd with CRA. Still nothing about CCA request or any acknowledgement of my letters so I think its time to up the anti a little and send the CPR31.16 request (think thats what it is) for the document and take the fight to them. Any thoughts / help appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All I lifted the following from another thread and am going to send the it to try and get my agreement, hope this is enough to try and force the issue a bit.

 

Dear Sirs

 

Account number nnnnnnn

 

I write with regards to the above account with your organisation.

 

I respectfully request that you provide me by return a copy of the credit agreement which bears my signature. I require this as I have reason to believe that there may be discrepancies within the agreement which may leave it improperly executed.

 

obviously if the agreement is improperly executed I would be entitled to ask the court to consider the agreement and make a declaration of the rights of parties to the agreement.

 

I must stress this request is NOT made pursuant to section 78 Consumer Credit Act 1974 but is made pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules ( Pre action protocols and Part 31.16) and therefore unsigned copy will not suffice, only a copy of the original contract in its unaltered form will suffice in these circumstances

 

Please confirm if you still hold a copy of my signed agreement and that you will provide me with this document.

 

I do not view this as an unreasonable request given that by supplying the document which I have asked for it will allow me to assess if my case has merit and will help to resolve matters possibly without the need to involve the court and will undoubtedly save costs on both sides

 

I look forward to your reply and wouyld ask for a response by 4pm on

11/09/2009

 

Regards

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Could someone take a look for me and as usual any comments appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not obliged to compy with a request under part 31 unless a court orders it. The way to do that is to make an application to the court using a form N244 (cost £40) with a schedule of the documents you need and a witness statement saying why you need them

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Steven, I decided to send the letter anyway to try and coax something out of them, but quite frankly I am at a loss as to what to do now really. Getting the normal letters i.e arrears blah blah blah but nothing in relation to the CCA request. Just so bl**dy frustrating

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...