Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is not as simple as you seem to suggest. 1. My wife needed the car and there are no local public transport facilities within 2 miles. 2 Neither of us has the technical expertise to change a battery. 3 Not only does the battery itself have to be appropriate for stop/start technology; but also, according to the handbook, has to be registered with Mini by a recognised agent, which I am not, neither is Big Motoring World. 4 The car had to be towed. Where was I going to have it towed to where I could be sure it would be properly dealt with? I couldn't trust Big Motoring World to do it. I couldn't have it towed to just any garage and be sure they had the right battery and the time to fit it. 5 The high sum involved is mainly for the diagnostic test which Big Motoring World asked me to obtain; and they did not initially raise any objection to the car being taken to the nearest main dealer. I would not have got the diagnostic test, if they had not asked for one. So, I understand where you are coming from, but having ignored requests for reimbursement, what else could I have done to recover my lay out?
    • Thank you FTMDave.  I'm happy to make your suggested changes.  I'll wait a day or 2 to see if any of the team have any other suggestions or feedback.  Do I then just email a copies to both UKPC and the court? Lookinforinfo - Unfortunately I am not sure if the signs have since been changed and cannot recall seeing any on the night as it was dark.   
    • The US confirmed it revoked licences allowing the export of some goods to Chinese tech giant.View the full article
    • I can't imagine that EVRi will want a judgement against them on this and based on this argument. I reckon you have a better than 90% chance that they will try to reach out to you before the trial date. They know that what they are doing is thoroughly wrong and dishonest and contrary to law. They are following this thread, of course – and they've already seen this witness statement. I imagine that they are scrabbling around trying to understand how they can extricate this without using too much face. I suppose they will make an offer to you which is a few quid short of your claim in order to say that they were justified in being stupid. Hold out for every penny. It's your money and you deserve it. It's not their money and they don't deserve it
    • New paragraph 47 – If you insert that – and move everything else down then I think you are good to go. Well done on going through the mill on this but it looks pretty good
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycards response to my SAR!


Zorro01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5391 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i asked for the recordings as part of my sar but they failed to produce them. Any ideas on a letter to give them a nudge in the right direction and forward them to me??

VICTORIES TO DATE THROUGH THE HELP OF THIS SITE:

 

1. Littlewoods Catalouge - No pursual of debt & wrote off £4500

2. Three mobile - Debt written off in full, all adverse entries including default removed from credit files, even got an apology from the Chairmans office

3. HSBC Bank - Partial refund for bank charges & claim lodged at court for outstanding charges.

4. HFC Bank - Ongoing - SAR'd in may- Going to register at court for non compliance.

5. Barclaycard - Being very awkward but Ongoing - These are a tricky bunch but they will fold before I do.

 

GOD BLESS CONSUMER ACTION GROUP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i asked for the recordings as part of my sar but they failed to produce them. Any ideas on a letter to give them a nudge in the right direction and forward them to me??

 

Hmm personally I'd write back in a non-template letter and if you've got it the rough date of the call.

 

Something along the lines of...

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I am in receipt of my Subject Access Request from yourselves dated xx/xx/xxxx. Unfortunately the request has not been complied with fully in accordance with the Data Protection Act. In my letter dated xx/xx/xxxx I specifically asked for recordings or transcripts of taped recordings to be provided. One such conversation I have had with your customer advisors was on xx/xx/xxxx. To fully comply with this subject Access request I expect you to either provide this recording, a transcript of said recording or confirmation in writing that this recording is no longer held by yourselves.

 

Yours

 

xxxx

S. Edited by the_shadow
tweaked the letter
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This just keeps getting stranger and stranger.

The other week Barclaycard sent my a final response to the CCA problem as you have read above.

Then yesterday I recieved a long letter from Barclaycard.

 

"I write further to the letter whereby you note disatissfaction to the documents you recieved in relation to a request made under section 77 / 78 of the consumer credit act 1974.

 

Firstly credit cards are regulated under section 78. Section 78 (1) states that the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement and a statement of account which is practicable to refer. Regarding a statement of account which is practicable to refer, the letter of which we sent in response to your section 78 (1) request to cover the issue of executed agreement.

 

"HOW DOES THE ACT DEFINE AN "EXECUTED AGREEMENT"?

"executed agreement" is defined in section 189 of the act as "a document signed by or on behalf of the parties, embodying the terms of a regulated agreement".

 

"WHAT DO THE RULES SAY ABOUT PROVIDING A COPY"?

The consumer credit act (cancelation notices and copies of documents) regulations 1983 ("the regulations") made under the act deal with how we are able to provide a "copy" of an agreement supplied to a debtor should be a "true" copy. Regulation 3 (2) provides that a copy may omit certain information, which allows you to be provided with a true copy, not a complete copy.

 

it then goes on about what happens if the origional agreement has been varied since origionally signed etc

 

"CONCLUSIONS IN RELATION TO THE DOCUMENT WE HAVE TO PROVIDE"

A "copy" of an agreement will satisfy the requirements even if the signature box and/or the signatures are not included as clarified by regulation 3 (2) of the consumer credit (cancellation notices and copies of documents) regulations 1983.

The definition of "executed agreement" refers to a document embodying the terms of the regulated agreement. When this is read with regulation 7 - for agreements that have been varied - a copy of the origional agreement would not embody it's terms. A copy of the agreement as varied would embody it's terms.

 

it then goes on and on just really driving the point home about the varied / non varied agreements.

 

"to address any issues about our lack of compliance with section 60 of the act. Section 60 relates to the form and content agreements. All Barclaycard credit agreements are in compliance with this. You may state that the application form which we provided you, for reference , when you made a request under section 78 does adhere to section 60. This is not a complete copy of your application form, but rather an excerpt to show you signed a contract with us. When you completed your application form, the document would have been presented to you in full, in legible form, and would have adhered to the requirements under section 60 olf the act".

"I hope this letter has helped with your concerns about the documents you have been supplied with under section 78 of the concumer credit act 1974. As our response fulfils the obligation under section 78 of the act, you should carry on paying the debt you have accured on your account. We do not class the account as in dispute, you have been supplied with the relevant documentation under section 78 of the act and we will carry on with collection services. If you send us further corresspondance questioning compliance with these areas of law, we are not obliged to respond beyond the statutory response we have already given you. We would require you to provide comprehensive legal and documentary evidence to support yoour claim to ascertain whether response from us is necessary.

Yours sincerely

Lynne T

 

Barclaycard customer services.

 

Anyone got any ideas on this?

They sent a final response and some screen prints last time and now they are sending me this. The application form they refer to in the letter was doctored and LOADS of things wrong with it including dates being wrong (by two years) and they also sent me their current cca.

Anyone got any ideas as what to do now???

VICTORIES TO DATE THROUGH THE HELP OF THIS SITE:

 

1. Littlewoods Catalouge - No pursual of debt & wrote off £4500

2. Three mobile - Debt written off in full, all adverse entries including default removed from credit files, even got an apology from the Chairmans office

3. HSBC Bank - Partial refund for bank charges & claim lodged at court for outstanding charges.

4. HFC Bank - Ongoing - SAR'd in may- Going to register at court for non compliance.

5. Barclaycard - Being very awkward but Ongoing - These are a tricky bunch but they will fold before I do.

 

GOD BLESS CONSUMER ACTION GROUP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump:confused:

VICTORIES TO DATE THROUGH THE HELP OF THIS SITE:

 

1. Littlewoods Catalouge - No pursual of debt & wrote off £4500

2. Three mobile - Debt written off in full, all adverse entries including default removed from credit files, even got an apology from the Chairmans office

3. HSBC Bank - Partial refund for bank charges & claim lodged at court for outstanding charges.

4. HFC Bank - Ongoing - SAR'd in may- Going to register at court for non compliance.

5. Barclaycard - Being very awkward but Ongoing - These are a tricky bunch but they will fold before I do.

 

GOD BLESS CONSUMER ACTION GROUP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about cpr route. is this a viable option?

VICTORIES TO DATE THROUGH THE HELP OF THIS SITE:

 

1. Littlewoods Catalouge - No pursual of debt & wrote off £4500

2. Three mobile - Debt written off in full, all adverse entries including default removed from credit files, even got an apology from the Chairmans office

3. HSBC Bank - Partial refund for bank charges & claim lodged at court for outstanding charges.

4. HFC Bank - Ongoing - SAR'd in may- Going to register at court for non compliance.

5. Barclaycard - Being very awkward but Ongoing - These are a tricky bunch but they will fold before I do.

 

GOD BLESS CONSUMER ACTION GROUP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks S

I am so ready for taking them to court. I will look into it.

Also I would like to know how to go about getting a court order to get HFC bank to send me my SAR. see here--> http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hfc-household/209351-wheres-my-sar-hfc.html

Do you have any knowledge of how to kick start this. I don't know where to begin and you have been around the forum much longer than I have and I could really do with some advice on this.

VICTORIES TO DATE THROUGH THE HELP OF THIS SITE:

 

1. Littlewoods Catalouge - No pursual of debt & wrote off £4500

2. Three mobile - Debt written off in full, all adverse entries including default removed from credit files, even got an apology from the Chairmans office

3. HSBC Bank - Partial refund for bank charges & claim lodged at court for outstanding charges.

4. HFC Bank - Ongoing - SAR'd in may- Going to register at court for non compliance.

5. Barclaycard - Being very awkward but Ongoing - These are a tricky bunch but they will fold before I do.

 

GOD BLESS CONSUMER ACTION GROUP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks S

I am so ready for taking them to court. I will look into it.

Also I would like to know how to go about getting a court order to get HFC bank to send me my SAR. see here--> http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hfc-household/209351-wheres-my-sar-hfc.html

Do you have any knowledge of how to kick start this. I don't know where to begin and you have been around the forum much longer than I have and I could really do with some advice on this.

 

Responded on that thread.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers the shadow

VICTORIES TO DATE THROUGH THE HELP OF THIS SITE:

 

1. Littlewoods Catalouge - No pursual of debt & wrote off £4500

2. Three mobile - Debt written off in full, all adverse entries including default removed from credit files, even got an apology from the Chairmans office

3. HSBC Bank - Partial refund for bank charges & claim lodged at court for outstanding charges.

4. HFC Bank - Ongoing - SAR'd in may- Going to register at court for non compliance.

5. Barclaycard - Being very awkward but Ongoing - These are a tricky bunch but they will fold before I do.

 

GOD BLESS CONSUMER ACTION GROUP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore this - just trying to get my sig working

VICTORIES TO DATE THROUGH THE HELP OF THIS SITE:

 

1. Littlewoods Catalouge - No pursual of debt & wrote off £4500

2. Three mobile - Debt written off in full, all adverse entries including default removed from credit files, even got an apology from the Chairmans office

3. HSBC Bank - Partial refund for bank charges & claim lodged at court for outstanding charges.

4. HFC Bank - Ongoing - SAR'd in may- Going to register at court for non compliance.

5. Barclaycard - Being very awkward but Ongoing - These are a tricky bunch but they will fold before I do.

 

GOD BLESS CONSUMER ACTION GROUP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zorro,

 

Your signature will appear on some posts but not others. Whilst I believe you can opt to omit your sig're, I don't think there's an option to include it with every post.

 

Site Teams' sig'res appear on every post made.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well thats ok. Cheers slick.

VICTORIES TO DATE THROUGH THE HELP OF THIS SITE:

 

1. Littlewoods Catalouge - No pursual of debt & wrote off £4500

2. Three mobile - Debt written off in full, all adverse entries including default removed from credit files, even got an apology from the Chairmans office

3. HSBC Bank - Partial refund for bank charges & claim lodged at court for outstanding charges.

4. HFC Bank - Ongoing - SAR'd in may- Going to register at court for non compliance.

5. Barclaycard - Being very awkward but Ongoing - These are a tricky bunch but they will fold before I do.

 

GOD BLESS CONSUMER ACTION GROUP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...