Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pace, Asset and Rockwell debt collection worries


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5313 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I thought I better start a new thread as I'm getting very confused and desperately need some advise.

 

In September of last year I started getting loads of letters from a company called RED and another one called LOWELL saying I owed money and threatened to take the matter further if I did not pay. I ignored the letters as I did not know what the debt was for, although I think there was some mention of it coming from HSBC. The letters eventually stopped and I thought it had all gone away.

 

Then two weeks ago I received a letter from PACE FORWARD saying that they 'are trying to contact the above named person [me] in order to dicuss a personal matter'. I never contacted them because I am very wary of contacting companies when I don't know what they want.

 

The following day I received a letter from ASSET COLLECTIONS & INVESTIGATIONS LTD saying that they had been granted permission by LOWELL FINANCIAL LTD to collect an outstanding debt of £2650.64. and given me a reference number. There is no mention as to what the original debt is for but tell me they would consider my 'proposal favourably' if they received payment of 60% of the balance in the next 14 days.

 

Yesterday I then received another letter this time from ROCKWELL DEBT COLLECTION AGENCY saying they had been instructed by TESSERA to collect a debt of £913.16 to be payed within 7 days and given me an account number.

 

Now I don't really know what these debts are from. The only thing I can think of is that I never cleared old bank accounts from when I was a student and having lots of money problems. I know I didn't have credit cards, but cannot for the life in me remember if I took out a graduate loan. In which case it will either be from the Halifax or HSBC. But I'm only guessing at this. Either way I have no information about any account I held with these so I cannot check if the accounts were cleared or not. Also, I cannot be sure when I last made payment to these people. It must be at least 5 years ago but it may be much longer as I graduated 12 years ago. I just cannot remember if I was contacted since graduating about any outstanding debts.

 

Can anyone advise me as to what to do? Do I just ignore all the letters again and hope they stop like before? Do I contact any of them or all of them. I'm not about to ring them as I have no way of recording it, but should I write to them. I am just a little scared to contact them in case I get told to pay immediately and I have no means by which to do this. I just whish I knew what it was all about as their letters all seem very vague.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alison

 

Hi, I thought I better start a new thread as I'm getting very confused and desperately need some advise.

 

In September of last year I started getting loads of letters from a company called RED and another one called LOWELL saying Same Company I owed money and threatened to take the matter further if I did not pay. I ignored the letters as I did not know what the debt was for, although I think there was some mention of it coming from HSBC. The letters eventually stopped and I thought it had all gone away.

 

Then two weeks ago I received a letter from PACE FORWARD saying that they 'are trying to contact the above named person [me] in order to dicuss a personal matter'. I never contacted them because I am very wary of contacting companies when I don't know what they want. Good plan :)

 

The following day I received a letter from ASSET COLLECTIONS & INVESTIGATIONS LTD saying that they had been granted permission by LOWELL FINANCIAL LTD to collect an outstanding debt of £2650.64. and given me a reference number. There is no mention as to what the original debt is for but tell me they would consider my 'proposal favourably' if they received payment of 60% of the balance in the next 14 days.

 

Yesterday I then received another letter this time from ROCKWELL DEBT COLLECTION AGENCY saying they had been instructed by TESSERA to collect a debt of £913.16 to be payed within 7 days and given me an account number. - Like to give you plenty of time dont they :mad:

 

Now I don't really know what these debts are from. The only thing I can think of is that I never cleared old bank accounts from when I was a student and having lots of money problems. I know I didn't have credit cards, but cannot for the life in me remember if I took out a graduate loan. In which case it will either be from the Halifax or HSBC. But I'm only guessing at this. Either way I have no information about any account I held with these so I cannot check if the accounts were cleared or not. Also, I cannot be sure when I last made payment to these people. It must be at least 5 years ago but it may be much longer as I graduated 12 years ago. I just cannot remember if I was contacted since graduating about any outstanding debts.

 

Can anyone advise me as to what to do? Do I just ignore all the letters again and hope they stop like before? Do I contact any of them or all of them. I'm not about to ring them as I have no way of recording it, but should I write to them. I am just a little scared to contact them in case I get told to pay immediately and I have no means by which to do this. I just whish I knew what it was all about as their letters all seem very vague.

 

Thanks

 

OK first things first, if you do not know what theyse alledged debts are then write to each of the muppets stating that you do not know what they are alledging to. There is a template which i will find and post up

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have no legal authority to money off you whatsoever, only a county court has this power.

Red & Lowells are the same company just for the record.

Report them all to the OFT/trading standards.

Never speak to them on phone & refuse to answer security questions if they ring you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them this and do not sign it

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all your replies. These letters can be very scary so its nice to know I made the right decission not to contact them. I will write to them all as suggested. Should I send the letters by recorded delivery so that they have to be signed for?

 

Once again, thank you so much and I'll let you nkow how I get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Registration Number: Z7385210

Date Registered: 18 December 2002 Registration Expires: 17 December 2009

 

Data Controller: TESSERA PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LIMITED

 

Address:

ARRAM BERLYN GARDNER

HOLBORN HALL

100 GRAY'S INN ROAD

LONDON

WC1X 8BY

Other Names:

ROCKWELL DEBT COLLECTION AGENCY

BTMK SOLICITORS

PACE FORWARD

FENTON COOPER

 

Just another debt collector calling itself different names in order to fool everyone

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I started this thread some time ago but because the demands stopped I never got around to sending them a letter.

 

Then this week I had a letter from Fenton Cooper (same company, different name I know) about an outstanding balance of £913.16 that needed paying immediately (although they could save me at least £639.21 depending on my circumstances!!). The letter gave me an account number but, as before never stated who the original debt was supposed to be with.

 

But then yesterday I also received a statement (this time from Tessera Portfolio management Ltd) that it said was issued under section 77a of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. On the statement it says opening balance 01/10/2008 £913.16; closing balance 30/09/2009 £913.16; statement period 30/09/08-30/09/09; original lender Halifax plc and then it gives me an account number as well as telling me the debt is managed by Fenton Cooper and their address.

 

The thing is I've never had a statement before. I haven't held a Halifax account for either 12 or 14 years. I no longer have any to prove or siprove I ever had a Halifax account never mind whether or not I owed them any money. Giving me a statement that covers the last 12 months seems ridiculus. It doesn't even give a date for when the debt first started.

 

I knew it was too good to be true when they all went quiet on me. Should I send them the letter above or is there another letter or better way to go on with this?

 

Thanks

Alison

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...