Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

same card payment taken twice, advice please


masmit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5433 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I used my debit card on the 31st may & payment was taken out on the 1st june. On the 5th of june the same payment went out again.

I came across this myself because it caused me to go over my agreed overdraft, leaving me with the funds i should have had unavailable.

 

I contacted the company involved, to which they blamed the payment trust internal banking system, saying it was Natwest RBS fault.They said a full refund had already been made & if i have any charges they will pay them.

 

So i contacted Natwest, this is on saturday, they said it had been logged but could not do anything because the relevant department to investigate the error works mon-fri. So i call back monday & was put through to this department. They said they could find no error on natwests part & would confirm this in writing & would confirm the charges incurred due to this double payment, proving to the company they were being applied.

 

So the company claim no responsibility, Natwest claim no responsibility, Then who is?:???:

I have been unable to withdraw funds i should have had available now since Saturday it is now Tuesday, i still have not recieved a refund.

 

I have made numerous calls & emails to both parties, 4 days without funds charges being applied, all of which is no fault of mine.

Is this not card fraud, unauthorised use, is it not Natwest that should take reponsibility, & not appling charges making the situation worse.

 

I am really stressed out have no money & it still is not resolved.

Please any advice would be greatfull to resolve this issue.

Edited by masmit
Link to post
Share on other sites

I used my debit card on the 31st may & payment was taken out on the 1st june. On the 5th of june the same payment went out again.

I came across this myself because it caused me to go over my agreed overdraft, leaving me with the funds i should have had unavailable.

 

I contacted the company involved, to which they blamed the payment trust internal banking system, saying it was Natwest RBS fault.They said a full refund had already been made & if i have any charges they will pay them.

 

So i contacted Natwest, this is on saturday, they said it had been logged but could not do anything because the relevant department to investigate the error works mon-fri. So i call back monday & was put through to this department. They said they could find no error on natwests part & would confirm this in writing & would confirm the charges incurred due to this double payment, proving to the company they were being applied.

 

So the company claim no responsibility, Natwest claim no responsibility, Then who is?:???:

I have been unable to withdraw funds i should have had available now since Saturday it is now Tuesday, i still have not recieved a refund.

 

I have made numerous calls & emails to both parties, 4 days without funds charges being applied, all of which is no fault of mine.

Is this not card fraud, unauthorised use, is it not Natwest that should take reponsibility, & not appling charges making the situation worse.

 

I am really stressed out have no money & it still is not resolved.

Please any advice would be greatfull to resolve this issue.

 

CAN someone help with this problem please

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the narrative for the card payment on your statement it will have the last four digits, the time and the date. Can you check that this is there? And can you tell me that they both tally?

Was it an internet payment or a face to face payment(ie you were in the shop at the time of the payment)?

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Natwest have blamed the internal banking system, they said it could be Natwest's internal payment trust but not sure. The charges will still be applied to my account & i should claim them back from company that took the payment TWICE.

 

They wonder why there's no trust, I have just found out there is no protection with a debit card online transaction.When there is a problem they pass the book.

All the bank want are charges, even after admitting this was no fault of mine & a banking error.

There needs to be a big shake up with these bank's, they still think they do no wrong & theirs nothing wrong with their system,

lets hope the charges claim NEXT WEEK WAKES THEM UP TO A CRAP SERVICE.:(:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the narrative for the card payment on your statement it will have the last four digits, the time and the date. Can you check that this is there? And can you tell me that they both tally?

Was it an internet payment or a face to face payment(ie you were in the shop at the time of the payment)?

 

thanks for the reply.

I have posted above there response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

still waiting for a response cos either it has fully gone through the account or it is a ghost transaction and won't actually fully clear through the account. And if it has been debited twice then the said retailer has indeed made the error.

 

 

EDIT: NatWest are dumping Maestro for VISA Debit later on in the year which will bring about a lot more protection(providing staff are trained properly).

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

still waiting for a response cos either it has fully gone through the account or it is a ghost transaction and won't actually fully clear through the account. And if it has been debited twice then the said retailer has indeed made the error.

 

 

EDIT: NatWest are dumping Maestro for VISA Debit later on in the year which will bring about a lot more protection(providing staff are trained properly).

Sorry for the delay, It was an online transaction that the one payment made has gone out of my account twice, causing me to go over my overdraft, that is why Natwest are charging me. it was not a ghost transaction.

like i have said natwest have admitted the error has nothing to do with me, but are still slapping charges to the account.

This is internal banking for you, like i said you would think i would have some protection from unauthorized transactions.

Crap banking policy pretecting themselves, screw the customer.

I agree totally about the staff training, they should start with showing the left had what the rights doing.

thank's for the response yourbank, I will have to make my complaint to both parties because i feel they both have responsability to me the customer about this error.

Edited by masmit
added
Link to post
Share on other sites

I still am none the wiser was it a duplicated online transfer or did you pay for goods online?

 

You can you post the transaction details on here excluding cost, name of business. All I need to see is the narrative bit ie POS and that line excluding cost and your balance for both transactions. Are they identical?

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still am none the wiser was it a duplicated online transfer or did you pay for goods online?

 

You can you post the transaction details on here excluding cost, name of business. All I need to see is the narrative bit ie POS and that line excluding cost and your balance for both transactions. Are they identical?

Yes it was a duplicated transfer taken i thought i had said this, the company told me there was an error involving there internal merchant banking system which asked for the payment twice.

They say it was not them that requested the payment twice, that their internal banking had this error & natwest was their merchant.

As i have said also natwest have denied the error on their part & applied charges to my account.

no company are takin responsibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it was a duplicated transfer taken i thought i had said this, the company told me there was an error involving there internal merchant banking system which asked for the payment twice.

They say it was not them that requested the payment twice, that their internal banking had this error & natwest was their merchant.

As i have said also natwest have denied the error on their part & applied charges to my account.

no company are takin responsibility.

If the company who you paid the money to is saying that it was a merchant fault then they are liable since they are the company. Have they refunded the amount that was taken twice? If they have then technically they are at fault. However with regards to the charges, it's a straight forward normal claim as advised on here.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the company who you paid the money to is saying that it was a merchant fault then they are liable since they are the company. Have they refunded the amount that was taken twice? If they have then technically they are at fault. However with regards to the charges, it's a straight forward normal claim as advised on here.

 

 

The company refunded me today.

They are claiming the merchant bank are Natwest & the error caused a duplicate payment.

Natwest are not budging with the charges.

through no fault of my own, i have to get the charges back off the company involved.

 

I will be making a formal complaint to both parties as i have said.

 

I feel totally let down by natwest, they are treating me as if i have abused my account, & proves there's no protection for customers, even when they have the facts, it proves their charges driven no matter what the circumstance.

 

Thank you yourbank for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yourbank,

can you take a look at this email & see what you think, i still can't get either party to take blame.

Dear Mr ...........

We have spoken to Payment Trust Technical Department (Nat West RBS) and they have confirmed that the error occurred at their end, and it is in no way a Betfred related problem.

A full tech report will be sent over to Betfred once their investigation is complete, but please find below a brief outline of what occurred and the current status of the affected transactions;

  • A file submitted by another merchant contained some errors - this made the PT/Streamline system reject all files
  • PT techs removed the records that had errors from the file in question and resubmitted. The duplication of transactions occurred because the file was re-submitted on the same day as the first attempt
  • All VISA duplicates have successfully been returned with 1 day delay - this accounts for the majority of the transactions.
  • Switch and Solo transactions keep failing when Payment Trust try to cancel the duplication - they are currently investigating what the issue is.
  • MasterCard duplicates will be cancelled but Payment Trust have to perform the action manually - they expect this to be complete later today, or Tuesday at the latest.

These actions are affected by Payment Trust Processing (Nat West RBS) and not Betfred. No monies have been received by Betfred and we have been assured that all customers will be reimbursed by end of business on Tuesday 9th June/Wednesday 10th June. Any funds transacted to customers in error will be recalled within the same process.

We have advised customers to forward their statements showing any charges and these will be refunded on receipt.

Once again we apologise for the error on behalf of the payment processors, but Betfred can hold no responsibility regarding the transactions on customers accounts.

If you require any further assistance then please do not hesitate to contact Customer Services

Kind Regards

Patrick McGuire

Customer Services Advisor

image001.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest you send an email to this address:

Explain the chronological way the transactions unfolded, who you spoke to at the bank and the company and copy and past the email response :

Email addy to send it to is [email protected]

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest you send an email to this address:

Explain the chronological way the transactions unfolded, who you spoke to at the bank and the company and copy and past the email response :

Email addy to send it to is [email protected]

 

 

Thank's yourbank

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...