Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I forgot to say, there is one last possibility and that is that they will receive your letter of rejection and simply fold, accept the rejection and refund you. Don't wait too long for this. Seven days maximum – but in that seven days you could send your letter of claim anyway and when that you don't hear from them or when they start mucking around at least you are seven days closer to beginning the legal action – and they will know it (which is the important thing).
    • Okay that is excellent that you have an email between the garage and the warranty company confirming that there is a serious problem with the gearbox. That is very powerful evidence. I think the situation is this: you have sent them a letter of rejection but the reputation of big motoring world is that they won't take a lot of notice and they will try to prevaricate and maybe even blame you. Clearly you don't want the car any more and anyway it sounds as if the cost of repairs is going to be enormous. You don't know if the warranty company is going to step up to the mark but the whole thing is going to take a long time and I understand that you have lost confidence in big motoring world because of this event and also their reputation which you are now discovering on Facebook and on this forum and no doubt elsewhere. On the basis that you don't want the car any more and you want your money back, you need to hurry things along. I think the first thing is that you need to decide if you are prepared to bring a claim in the County Court. Even without the warranty money, the claim is worth more than £10,000. For actions less than £10,000, you bring a "small claim" and this means that even if you lose the case you won't be liable for the other side's costs. If you win the case then not only will you get your money plus interest but also you will recover all of the costs of the action. For actions more than £10,000, you go to something called the "fast track" and in the event that you lose the case, then you could be liable to reimburse the winner some of the costs. This means that in addition to not recovering your own money, you would lose your own court fees and also you would have to to bear the costs of the other side probably something less than £5000 – but as a rough guess. If you bring your court claim then your chances of success are almost 100%. Frankly if you brought a court claim then I can imagine that big motoring world will put their hands up and pay you out rather than face go to court and losing and getting a judgement against them. However, it you need to consider that this is a risk factor – although my view it is a negligible risk factor. If you did bring a court case, it wouldn't be instant. If they put their hands up then it would probably happen very quickly. If they didn't put their hands up then you could take anything up to a year for the matter to be resolved and during that time you would be without your car and without your money and in the middle of litigation. I'm explaining this to you say that you understand how it works. Bring a court case would be really the last resort when everything else has failed. However, I'm quite certain that you would win and it would be stupid of big motoring world to try to resist. In order to bring a court case you would have to send a letter of claim giving them 14 days to accept rejection and organise the refund otherwise you would begin the claim. Don't imagine that you could bluff this. If you did send a letter of claim then you would have to go through with it otherwise you lose all credibility and you might as well pack up and go home. So with this in mind, here are possible courses of action you could take. You can simply wait and see what their reaction to your letter of rejection will be. However they may not reply or else they may find some other reason to delay and of course during that time you will be without your car and without your money blah blah blah, not knowing if big motoring world were going eventually to start acting sensibly and respectfully towards you. The second thing you can do – and I think this has been suggested on Facebook – is that you can go along there and simply make yourself present and talk to other customers and generally speaking make a nuisance of yourself and embarrass them to the point where you would be explaining to other potential customers to be careful, to look on Facebook, and to do some careful research before they put their business to big motoring world. This has a reasonable chance of success although you would have to be careful. You should go accompanied by a friend and there should be no anger, no arguments, nothing that could be considered as being overly aggressive so that big motoring world would have no justification in kicking you out or even worse, calling the police. If you did this, then I would suggest that you record everything on the telephone carried in a pocket. A fully charged battery will probably keep a voice recorder and a telephone going for more than 20 hours or 30 hours. The other person can video any incidents so that everything is clear and you can inform big motoring world then it will be going up on the Internet. If you did this, my favourite option would be to issue the letter of claim giving them 14 days, and then going along to big motoring world with a copy of your letter of rejection and a copy of the exchange between the mechanic and the warranty company and a copy of your letter of claim – all settled together – and probably about 20 or 30 copies in all and I would start handing them out to any customers who came in. Big motoring world will soon get the picture and they will either move your the premises in which case you stand outside and carry on doing it or they will finally give in. Of course there is a chance that they won't give in and they will simply call your bluff – but in that case I think you have no choice other than to follow through with your 14 day threat in the letter of claim and to begin the legal action. At the same time you should be putting up reviews on Google and also trust pilot explaining exactly what has happened and also explaining that the mechanic has confirmed to the warranty company that there is the serious problem, that you have asserted the right to reject and that this is been ignored by big motoring world and that you have now sent a letter of claim and that you will be starting a legal action in 14 days. Once again, don't bluff about the legal action. If you threaten it – then you must mean it – and on day 15 you click of the claim. You don't need a solicitor for any of this. It's all fairly straightforward and of course we will help you all the way that it the decision is yours to make and I think you need to make it fairly quickly. I think the cost of starting an action for about £13,000 is 5% and then also if it goes to trial which I would say is almost impossible – there would be an additional fee. You would claim interest at 8%. A judge might award a lower figure but frankly if you can show that big motoring world is attempting to ride roughshod over your very clear statutory consumer rights, I can imagine that the judge will want to show displeasure by awarding the full 8% which is a pretty good rate – even though it's not compensation for the hassle and the distress you are going through. If you decide to get solicitor, then if you win the case, because it is over £10,000 you will recover some of your costs but you won't recover all of them. If the solicitor begins by having exchanges of letters then I doubt whether you will be up to recover the cost of those and you could easily find that you're chalking up 500 quid or even a thousand simply on initial exchanges of correspondence. Also you need to bear in mind that if after having exchanges with a solicitor, big motoring world cave in – then you definitely won't get those costs back because you won't have gone to court and therefore a judge will not have made the order for payment of those costs. I suggest very strongly that you avoid paying any money for a solicitor and that you do it yourself. It's not a big deal – although you will have to you react quickly to the help we offer on this forum. Also, an additional benefit is that you will learn a lot and you will gain confidence and eventually you will feel good about suing anybody else who gets in your way. Nothing not to like! If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must take control of the solicitor. Most of them prefer to sit in an office writing letters on the clock. If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must instruct the solicitor very firmly that they should send one letter of complaint giving seven days. A second letter – a letter of claim giving 14 days and that they must then begin the action. If you don't do this. If you don't take control then it will simply cost you money, you will be without your car even longer and of course without your money. The whole thing is a nightmare. I think I've laid out the options but please do ask questions. I hope you can see that this is the kind of advice that you won't be getting on Facebook. Nothing against Facebook. It's good as a meeting place and to make people realise that they aren't on their own – but after that the advice given is weak and confusing.  
    • What makes you say that?  I have no idea how I would go about that or why they would even entertain discussions now that they've won the Court case
    • Our main Equity Partner, Cabot Square Capital invests 
    • Yes it’s the garage and warranty company. And then my husband forwarded me the email. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A guide to Charging Orders & Orders for Sale


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2880 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hiya all

 

will be back to read this thread in full as i will need to be prepared for the near future x angel

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've got it. You just need to prove that your instalments were in place prior to the interim application.

 

Instalments agreed on the day after the application for CO dated and therefore should be before or on same day as application received by court. Could the CO application have been prompted by my application for instalments of which the claimant would have been notified????

Edited by cymruambyth
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

ps, the Ellis case may also be known as; Mercantile Credit Company Limited v Huxtable and Others (Huxtable being ''...one of a series of similar cases decided by this court on 11th March 1987'') (ellis being one of t'others?).

 

Re Ropaig... case, this is the preceding application for permission to appeal hearing http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/1381.html

 

imo

Edited by Ford
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

Hope someone can advise me urgently on the following:~

 

Creditor obtained CCJ a year ago, This was a General Form of Judgement Order and no instalments were set by the court. Been paying what I can afford since then, and have now received application for CO which Judge has granted as an Interim Order.

 

Final hearing next month, really don't know what I should be doing, do I challenge this with the court and creditor at least 7 days before the hearing ?

 

Urgent help would be most appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

S.B.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Hope someone can advise me urgently on the following:~

 

Creditor obtained CCJ a year ago, This was a General Form of Judgement Order and no instalments were set by the court. Been paying what I can afford since then, and have now received application for CO which Judge has granted as an Interim Order.

 

Final hearing next month, really don't know what I should be doing, do I challenge this with the court and creditor at least 7 days before the hearing ?

 

Urgent help would be most appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

S.B.

 

Hmm TBH I dont think you can defend this, if you didnt dispute the original claim then the judgment by default tells the court you admit the debt, the fact no installments were set by the court mean the creditor is entitled to enforce by a CO, there is a time limit when they "should" apply for it but I'd say a judge would rubber stamp this application.

 

I think in the correct thing to have done is when the judgement came through start paying a regular amount that you could afford AND apply to the court for a redetermination of the payments at the same time.

 

Now a CO application is in place I dont think an agreement on installments will be met, best you could probably get would be an agreement/term stipulating that so long as payments were kept up no order for sale would be attempted.

 

Hopefully others will give there opinions too.

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shadow

 

Thanks for your reply, I did dispute the claim but unfortunately didn't get the result I was hoping for.

 

I have religously paid what I can afford for the last year, I didn't think the Redetermination would come in to play as the court hadn't set the instalments.

 

I was just reading online that I could ask the Judge for an Instalment Order or an Attachment to Earnings Order...do you think this is possible?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

S.B.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Truth be told, there seems very little chance of stopping Charging Orders being made final these days. For my last one (yes I have stacks of them all for costs from the same company), I had an up to date payment plan which had been set by the court, the mortgage company wrote a letter objecting to the CO (around £1,000 for this one), and the judge just waved it through anyway!

Since then I've handed the keys to the mortgage company, and all the CO's have now become unsecured debts again, although the amount is now thirty odd times what it was because of all the added costs!

By the way, even though the payment plan was up to date without even any late payments, just a few letters from the DCA like this " We are disappointed not to have received... if payment in full is not received within 7 days of the date of this letter immediate legal action..." were enough to convince the judge that I had not kept up with the payment plan, even though I presented receipts showing otherwise!

I'm convinced that the solicitors who do the most backscuttling of the judge will always win, regardless!

Edited by meursault22
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have three CO's placed on my property since april 2010. I have never received a copy of the final orders (they were granted), the interim orders read that the court orders that the debtor in the asset described stand charged with the payment of £13,000 + £8,000 + £25,000 together with any further interest becoming due and the cost of the application. My question is, i have never received any written notification of the interest i am being charged on the order, do they need to inform me of this? any help greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to sequenci and everyone who has offered help.

 

I WON

 

Halleluiahopen_mouthed_smile.gif

 

All I had to say was that I thought it presumptuous to prepare costs!

 

They were represented, he tried arguing the case of ROPAIGEALACH v Allied Bank to say that you could havean Instalment Order and a CO; however DJ noted down chronology of everything and ruled that even though they applied for ICO date 1/2/11, my instalment order was granted on 2/2/11 and ICO not granted until 7/2/11 and therefore Mercantile Credit held forth. Luckily I had copies of everything as he didn't have a copy of the instalment order.

He was lovely, knew the law and double checked everything.

Morgan requested costs and DJ asked me 'you have obviously been doing some research'. That's when I said that although I had done research and taken a day off work I thought it presumptuous; he smiled and said no order for costs and reminded me to send a copy of the order to get the ICO removed.

All in all a quite pleasant experience with a great outcome.

I will post my defence later on in case it can be modified to help other Caggers

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to sequenci and everyone who has offered help.

 

I WON

 

Halleluiahopen_mouthed_smile.gif

 

All I had to say was that I thought it presumptuous to prepare costs!

 

They were represented, he tried arguing the case of ROPAIGEALACH v Allied Bank to say that you could havean Instalment Order and a CO; however DJ noted down chronology of everything and ruled that even though they applied for ICO date 1/2/11, my instalment order was granted on 2/2/11 and ICO not granted until 7/2/11 and therefore Mercantile Credit held forth. Luckily I had copies of everything as he didn't have a copy of the instalment order.

He was lovely, knew the law and double checked everything.

Morgan requested costs and DJ asked me 'you have obviously been doing some research'. That's when I said that although I had done research and taken a day off work I thought it presumptuous; he smiled and said no order for costs and reminded me to send a copy of the order to get the ICO removed.

All in all a quite pleasant experience with a great outcome.

I will post my defence later on in case it can be modified to help other Caggers

 

 

hi

well done

did you manage to get hold of a copy of the ('unreported' (apart from the papers!)) Mercantile case(s) in the end?

Link to post
Share on other sites

cymruambyth has provided a pdf of the defence used.

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]27664[/ATTACH]

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help sequenci, your guide and replies to my questions were invaluable. I can only stress how important your advice to apply asap for an instalment order was. My defence pdf is posted in 2 places (thank you CB), I just hope it can help someone in the future.

Cy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

If soneone has a third charge over the property by way of a charging order do they have to have the consent of the first and second charge holders before they can emforce an Order for Sale?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

If soneone has a third charge over the property by way of a charging order do they have to have the consent of the first and second charge holders before they can emforce an Order for Sale?

Thanks

 

 

 

They don't need express consent, they just need the pre-existing charge holders not to object.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2880 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...