Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.     
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court. When you get there you can ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all meaning you will have to approach "specialist" (aka extortionate) brokers. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding MS90s if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
    • Just the sort of people you despise eh Jugg  You would be much happier among your mates in that room with Rayner begging for votes 
    • I see the trial of the real criminal in the Biden Family has started rather than the sham political persecution of Trump    Biden will of course try to distance himself as far as possible to no avail  Even more votes for The Donald🤣    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mums NatWest Credit Card.


tom a
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the advice so far but here's an update.

 

Mum didn't pay August payment and today September statement arrived showing £12 late payment charge and two months payments owing to be paid by 1st September.

 

What is our next step please ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's a stupid game they play, they have already admitted that they do not possess an enforceable agreement, they cannot take any legal action with regards to the a/c.

 

Send them this; http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/571-failiure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

 

Technically speaking whilst the a/c is in dispute they cannot add interest, make charges or process data, in reality they will. But because of the lack of agreement they are wasting their time because it will never have to be paid. Eventually the penny will drop with them and they'll either give up or sell the debt to a debt collection company. Don't worry because they can be seen off easily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From a legal standpoint, the bank do not have any legal grounding to add charges, report arrears on her credit report, call or write to her demanding repayment, pass the debt to a DCA or start legal proceedings.

 

From a more realistic standpoint, the bank will add charges, write to her demanding payment, pass the debt to a DCA and if all else fails take her to court.

 

Then you have to show this letter to the judge and with some legal help file a defence regarding the unenforcability of the debt.

 

Or you can take the driving seat and somens Natwest to court yourself requesting that the judge make a ruling persuant to S.174 (I think, others will clarify)... the section that make a declaration of rights and obligations of parties, stating that the debt is unenforcable.

 

In the current climate, and Natwest being a brand of stoney-broke RBS I would expect them to ignore their legal obligations until the bitter end when a judge tells them the two finger salute.

 

My mother is the same, she has a £4,500+ balance with Barclaycard which we know 100% is unenforcable but she bottled out and continued paying as soon as they sent her a statment with a £12 charge. She, too, is far too proud and set in her ways to consider the possibility that there is a better way, she just won't have it.

 

She'd rather pay the debt and just won't admit to herself that it is infact unenforcable.

 

I would imagine that the prospect of court is just far too much for our dear old mothers, eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they can offset between a/cs so she should open a seperate account with an unrelated banking group such as the Cooperative Bank. She can do it in-branch straight away if she provides identification + a couple of proofs of address. A basic a/c will include a direct debit/hole in the wall card & Visa Electron.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they can offset between a/cs so she should open a seperate account with an unrelated banking group such as the Cooperative Bank. She can do it in-branch straight away if she provides identification + a couple of proofs of address. A basic a/c will include a direct debit/hole in the wall card & Visa Electron.

 

Although having said that if she's not missed any payments in 20 years it's fair to say her credit rating is brilliant.There's no need for her to be demiened (as she may see it) with a basic account, when she will almost certainly be approved for a "Proper" account.Co-Operative may be a good choice, but as long as it isn't any bank under the "RBS" umbrella she won't be affected by "Right of offset".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been to see mum today and there's no way she will change banks.

She's also getting very worried about missing a payment and is seriously thinking about making the next payment and just continuing paying.

Is there anything I can show her on this forum that might make her change her mind.

She still can't grasp that if NatWest have no agreement the debt is unenforceable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've tried this with my dear mother and believe me... if she is anything like mine, you can try and explain and help and make aware as much as you can tolorate without going totally mad and it still won't make any difference.

 

My mother has quite happily, left herself in a position where she cannot afford to do anything except eat, watch TV, and drive to the shops, to save from defaulting on any credit agreements.

 

I've even proven that one of her biggests debts is unenforcable by doing a CCA and DPA request and finding that the only thing they have with her signiature on it is a tear-off slip from the application form with no T&C, but her opinion is that

 

"Paying the debt is much easier to cope with than dealing with what I'd have to deal with should I try to get out of it"

 

It may be easy for you and I to do all this stuff with letter writing, legal threats, etc etc, but some people just find the whole process stressful in a way you and I can't appreciate.

 

I wish you the best of luck but I fear your effort may be wasted...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try has I might mum is going to pay this debt.

Her way of thinking is "I've had the money so I must pay it".

What are the chances of getting the interest frozen?

If there is a possibility of this what do I need to put in a letter?

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Offer them 1% of the balance per month, in writing, along with a budget sheet showing that this is all your mum can afford. Advise that the payment is non-negotiable, and say that they can avoid having to issue a DN by accepting the offer and freezing the interest.

 

My mother has been paying £50 a month to Barclaycard for the last six years and not been charged a penny interest; balance has come down from over £8000 to about £4500. No default, and no arrears marked on her credit report, "Good" credit score, the account is in an "Arrangment" and the status of the account is still marked as "Paid up on time" on her credit file.

 

They tried increasing her payment to £100 a month, but I CCA'd them and they backed down :p

 

Other than that not a great deal, other than not paying for three to six months, after which time the account will default and interest will stop being applied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we have decided what to do.

Mum is not sleeping with worry so she is going to pay what she can afford and we are going to make the difference up to the minimum payment.

What's the chances of getting the interest frozen if we do this bearing in mind they have no CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have already admitted that they cannot provide the agreement & they do not possess one so as I said earlier they cannot take enforcement. This puts your mother in an extremely strong position now, so if she insists on making payment you could try negotiation.

 

Tell them although the alleged debt is legally unenforceable your mother feels morally obliged to make payment. However she will only do so if interest is stopped being added & all unfair charges are deducted from the a/c. Then make an offer of payment she can comfortably and reasonably afford....not the minimum payment they want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mum is going to make her payment next week even if we've had no reply from CCA follow up letter.

Just starting to prepare a letter requesting interest to be frozen.

Can someone take a look at this and add or remove as they think ?

I'm not very good at writing letters.

Thanks.

 

 

"Although the alleged debt on the above account is legally unenforceable I feel morally obliged to make payment.

 

However I will only do so if interest is stopped and all unfair charges deducted from the account.

 

I propose to pay £100 a month until the account is cleared.

 

I trust you will carefully consider the above request.

 

 

Yours sincerely "

Edited by tom a
Link to post
Share on other sites

have u sent a SAR off?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. To be honest I think if NatWest sent mum a letter saying don't bother paying she would still be awake all night with worry.

What ever a SAR turned up, it won't alter mums opinion.

Thanks anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Mum received this letter today. It's in response to the Account in Dispute letter I sent.

 

"Dear Mrs xxxx

 

Account Number xxxxxxx

 

Thank you for your letter dated 15th August 2009.

 

I write with reference to your recent request under section 78 (1) to supply copies of the original agreement set out under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

We appreciate that under s. 78 (6) of the Consumer Credit Act if you decide not to meet your obligations under the card agreement as they fall due we will be unable to take steps to enforce repayment of the card debt by court action. Nevertheless, we expect you to meet your obligations under the agreement, bearing in mind that the agreement isn't void, and remains valid albeit unenforceable.

 

We do not dispute that the agreement is currently not enforceable so we see no need for any threatened action to obtain a court declaration to that effect.

 

For the avoidance of doubt and as previously advised if you do not make the card repayments as they fall due we will report your default to the Credit Reference Agencies.

 

If you believe that we haven't investigated properly or acted fairly, you have the right to refer to the Financial Ombudsman Sevice. You can do this if we haven't been able to reach an agreement by 12th October 2009, which is eight weeks after you first contacted us. The Ombudsman would then assess whether to check the Bank's own investigation and, if they decided to, would work with you and us to reach a conclusion.

 

I trust this clarifies matters for you.

 

Your sincerely xxxxxx"

 

Will someone take a look at this and explain it in simple English for me.

Mum still has not had a reply asking them to freeze interest.

What's the best course of action to take bearing in mind mum still wants to pay debt back ?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have held their hands up and admitted yet again that they cannot make your mother make any more payments if she chooses not to, then they've played the 'moral card' by stating the debt still exists. They cannot take her to court nor can they obtain any CCJs or warrants for bailiffs to call. They can ask nicely for payment and that's all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have said that whilst they can ask nicely and report arrears / default notice to the credit reference agencies in respect of not paying the account, they also recognise that they can't enforce the debt through the court.

 

So they might send letters to say payment is late and pay please but that's as far as it would ever go. They would, however, put your mum in a position where she has a very poor credit rating and may use right of offsett to clear the account from her Natwest current account, as they do not need a court order to do these things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...