Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Meteor Bletchley Station PCN


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5034 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On the 5th May 2009 I visited Bletchley Station for the first time. I drove into the car park. It looked very new and it looked like there was still work in progress. There was no barrier, I could not see any ticket machines, I didn’t notice any tickets on other cars, there was no indication payment was required or how to pay. My assumption was that payments had been suspended while the work was in progress or it was a pay on exit. When I got back there was a £45.00 fine on my windscreen and I was not the only one. I have appealed to Meteor but this has been rejected. I’ve made a little video to illustrate my case which I am in the process of uploading on to YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.. If you have received a penalty notice at Bletchley similar to mine, I’d like to hear from you. Together we can beat this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phil

 

Assuming this isn't a railway byelaw ticket (which I doubt), you're falling into the trap.

 

You just have an unenforceable invoice from a [problem] company. There is no appeals process - no private company will turn down profit.

 

No need to fight anything - just ignore them and the junkmail they will send you.

 

It's not a fine - private companies have no such powers in law. It's an invoice for alleged breach of contract. Remedy for breach of contract is damages, but they haven't lost £45 have they?

 

Look at all the other private parking threads to get your head around this con.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Al says, don't put yourself out. Save everything they send you but reply to nothing. If they are stupid enough to try taking you to court, only then should you bother putting "your side" to the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Al / Crem,

Are you really saying “do nothing”? I’ve always played things straight; no late payments on loans or mortgages and on the few occasions I’ve picked up PCN’s I’ve paid them. I’m a bit of a pussy and I feel intimidated by the law and big organisations. Normally I would just give in but I feel offended. I’ve acted reasonably and responsibly and I don’t see why I should pay. Is there anything they could do to hurt me? Can they issue some kind of default notice or something that will give me a rotten credit rating or issue a County Court Summons?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Al / Crem,

Are you really saying “do nothing”? I’ve always played things straight; no late payments on loans or mortgages and on the few occasions I’ve picked up PCN’s I’ve paid them. I’m a bit of a pussy and I feel intimidated by the law and big organisations. Normally I would just give in but I feel offended. I’ve acted reasonably and responsibly and I don’t see why I should pay. Is there anything they could do to hurt me? Can they issue some kind of default notice or something that will give me a rotten credit rating or issue a County Court Summons?

As you have no account they can't issue a default notice. They can issue a County Court Summons but unless they're feeling really brave they won't. Even if they do, for your credit rating to be affected, you have to lose the case (you are entitled to defend it) and not pay the judgement in the time set by the court.

 

All that said there are some solid get outs. The amount they are asking would be deemed a contractural penalty. They may also not hold sufficient rights to charge for parking in the first place. And thats just for starters.

 

This is little more than a mail based [problem]. If you had a letter from Nigeria asking for money would you pay out? Please give this drivel from Meteor the same treatment.

 

Ignore them Ignore them. Best advice we can give you.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, do nothing.

 

Absolutely zilch.

 

The [problem] relies on the fears you have at the moment- always playing things straight, feeling intimidated, fear of court, ignorance about CCJs etc.

 

They can take the driver to court, but they don't know who that is. They only have the owner's address. Even if they took the right person to court, how could they justify £45? They haven't lost £45 and contracts/T&Cs do not work by 'if you do x, you agree to pay £xx'. Otherwise they'd make the amount £10,000, take each and every person to court and win.

 

Back to reality though and the chances of them taking anyone to court is about 0.1%. This is a mail based [problem]. Part of the [problem] is threatening you with court, CCJs and kidnapping your dog.

 

Simply ignore and they will go away after a few letters and some bits of junkmail from 'debt' collectors.

 

Re. CCJs - you would need to be taken to court, lose AND still refuse to pay.

Re. debt collectors - they are NOT bailffs, merely private companies like any otehr who merely write threatening letters. They have no powers.

 

I’m a bit of a pussy and I feel intimidated by the law and big organisations.

 

The law is on your side. They haven't got a leg to stand on.

As for 'big organisations', you're merely dealing with a little private company who have a dingy office somewhere.

 

All you have is an unenforceable invoice. Except nobody would be duped if they called it an invoice, hence why they call it a 'PCN' and go on about appeals, laws they've made up and court. Since when did your BT bill go on about appeals?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On topic

Al27, Crem and Pin1onu I’ve been getting some ear ache from my brother in law about Credit Reference Agencies. Is there any way Meteor could give me a bad credit reference or sell a PCN to a debt collector who could do the same?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On topic

Al27, Crem and Pin1onu I’ve been getting some ear ache from my brother in law about Credit Reference Agencies. Is there any way Meteor could give me a bad credit reference or sell a PCN to a debt collector who could do the same?

 

No!

 

Next question. :D

 

 

To hit your credit reference they would have to:-

 

a) take you to court (unlikely)

b) WIN! (now we're getting into fantasy land)

c) you not pay in 28 days as instructed (painful as it would be, why wouldn't you

pay if a court told you to?)

d) they go back to court for default judgement (about 3 months later, they'd get

this)

e) THEN, eventually it will show as a CCJ against you

Edited by crem
Link to post
Share on other sites

Re. CCJs - you would need to be taken to court, lose (or not defend) AND still refuse to pay.

 

Only Meteor could take you to court (0.1% chance). A debt collector cannot. They are utterly powerless unless they are assigned bailiffs and have a CCJ in their hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

because for council tickets the owner is liable ! they send to the 'person appearing to be the owner'. its assumed its the RK unless disproved. DVLA does not keep owner records.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DVLA supply information to a number of commercial organisations. Allegedly this is supposed to be sanitised to prevent the keeper’s details being disclosed. But the DVLA web site does say that these organisations can combine this data with data from elsewhere. One of the companies listed is Experian, a credit reference agency. See http://www.transportoffice.gov.uk/crt/otherbusinesses/saleofdata/vehiclecheckcompaniessaleofanonymiseddata.htm

The DVLA web site http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/OwningAVehicle/AdviceOnKeepingYourVehicle/DG_4022066

List reasons why information about vehicles and their registered keepers might be released and offers a list of organisation who may obtain that information electronically http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/OwningAVehicle/AdviceOnKeepingYourVehicle/DG_4022066?IdcService=GET_FILE&dID=192072&Rendition=Web

One of the companies on the list is Experian.

The DVLA also provide “Approved Conditional Access”. Some companies are able to request electronic access and receive information via a secure link.

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/OwningAVehicle/AdviceOnKeepingYourVehicle/DG_4022067?IdcService=GET_FILE&dID=118470&Rendition=Web This sounds remarkably like the scheme above. One of the organisations listed is the British Parking Association who run the “Approved Operator Scheme” http://www.britishparking.co.uk/info_page.php?id=73&info_id=21 who have access to the DVLA database. Approved operators include Meteor, Debt Recovery Plus Limited Commercial Collection Services Ltd, G24 and Newlyne. All of whom are old friends of CAG. There are also a number of companies who specialise in Number Plate Recognition.

I noticed that G24 (a car park management company) and Newlyne (a debt recovery company) have the same address, funny that!

I’m sure it is perfectly feasible that these organisations could “Legally” share information and build up huge databases on us. It’s one thing for government bodies to hold this information but for private companies … it scary!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s one thing for government bodies to hold this information but for private companies … it scary!

 

The government are very lax at "holding" our information as they have a nasty habit of not holding on to it properly when travelling on trains, buses etc. The data they do manage to keep hold of and not loose, then then make a few quid selling to Tom, Dick and Harry. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would any one buy it when you can get it for free on trains? :-)

 

What is it with "perky"? I googled Perky+Parking. Mike Perkins takes up a lot of band width! I whois'ed ppc. The registrant has a PO box at a sorting office in Wolverhampton. It just gets more interesting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

perky is one of the more, if not the most, shall we say 'belligerent' PPCs. his website is a hoot. Other PPCs use his arguments for reasons that cannot be discerned by logical thinkers. I think this is the origin of 'Planet Perky'. Plus he pops up, under various assumed names, now and again trolling on parking forums trotting out his well worn spiel. If, like myself and a few others, you lurk on pepipoo as a guest you will be able to find 'the pepipoo challenge'. Perky spouts on about his wins but cherry picks his victims so a challenge was issued to let him take on a non cherry picked victim (as of course if Perky is right he will win against anyone) even with the offer to take photographs. Perky has signally failed to take up the challenge which rather says everything that is needed about his 'stance'. Plus feedback from other BPA PPC members has been rather non complimentary. It seems that Perky thinks he is 'a player' and he has claimed to have legal qualifications. Reality seems to gainsay his opinion of himself but at least he has fame of a sort if that is any comfort to him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just a little up date.

It started in May when I couldn’t find a ticket machine to buy a £6.50 ticket. I got a “Slap and Run” (PCN) for £90.00 or £45.00 if you are quick. I now have two letters from Roxburghe Debt Collectors claiming £125.00 and two letters from Graham White Solicitors, the second forecasting an additional £142.25 in fees before they start legal action. The format of these letters is exactly the same as others posted elsewhere on CAG. Following your and others advice I’m doing nothing. Scary though!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...