Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ACS:Law copyright file sharing claims, Gallant Macmillan - and probably some others along the way...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4930 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So how can i be guilty of making this SH*TY scooter track availaible from my connection when i had no idea it was been down-loaded from my connection, this is like getting your credit card stolen when you are asleep and saying i should of none in my sleep it was stolen and stoped it. If ACS think they are getting any dosh out of me i would like to say GOOD LOOK i will fight them all the way to the E.U courts if i have to.:x:x

 

Oi..we are all huge Scooter fans here you know ! *gazes longingly at my Scooter poster of the teutonic twosome* :)

 

If you claim that youy didnt have this track on your PC and available for download then either, your PC had been hi-jacked, prob unlikely and you'd quite easily notice, your wifi connection had been hi-jacked, more probable or ACS/Digiprotect have cocked up and wrongly identified you, this last one is the most likely.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Oi..we are all huge Scooter fans here you know ! *gazes longingly at my Scooter poster of the teutonic twosome* :)

 

If you claim that youy didnt have this track on your PC and available for download then either, your PC had been hi-jacked, prob unlikely and you'd quite easily notice, your wifi connection had been hi-jacked, more probable or ACS/Digiprotect have cocked up and wrongly identified you, this last one is the most likely.

 

Andy

 

.....Or the ISP's records of who had that specific IP address at that specific date/time were wrong.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.....Or the ISP's records of who had that specific IP address at that specific date/time were wrong.

 

S.

 

 

..yes.thats quite a viable reason too, in fact there appears no actual reason why an ISP would keep hold of IP addresses anyway or why it would go out of its way to ensure their accuracy. Many ISP's have already voiced displeasure at their new 'policing' role.

 

If it could be proved that this info wasnt accurate then ACS would be in deep do-do :)

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder has any one considered do the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 in particular Section 1 Unlawful Interception apply to how someone was able to ascertain that files were being uploaded from Private Home Computers without a warrant

 

I dont think that really matters as the monitors are based outside of the uk and are not bound by uk laws. Now if this evidence can be used if it is breaking uk laws is a diffent matter, as they will never be seen in front of a judge, so we may never know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have got this info from another forum

 

(This new law has turned the owners of Pirate Bay into millionaires.

Here, for 5 euros a month you get a VPN connection and a masked IP.....and away yer go.)

 

I dont no what law he is referring to or what country he may be from but i think he is referring to ACS-law, So it looks like ACS are driving the pirates underground and all the people who have been wrongley accused could join pirate bay for revenge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, it has been a while since ACS sent the 3rd letter demanding the reduced amount of £350, that one, like all the others was replied to with LOD and since, nothing.

 

I'm wondering what the next move will be. And find it v odd that the last letter demanded the £350 be paid within 21 days blahh blahh blahh but it has been at least 6 weeks, if not more since they sent it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have got this info from another forum

 

(This new law has turned the owners of Pirate Bay into millionaires.

Here, for 5 euros a month you get a VPN connection and a masked IP.....and away yer go.)

 

I dont no what law he is referring to or what country he may be from but i think he is referring to ACS-law, So it looks like ACS are driving the pirates underground and all the people who have been wrongley accused could join pirate bay for revenge.

 

So instead of stamping out piracy, ACS Law have helped propogated it!

That is going to make them very popular with their clients......! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they can monitor bittorrent and know the ports why not just block all ports? Pirates will find away to do there thing the ads on tv keep telling us they funded organized crime and this has been going on since cassettes where about. Media industry is the answer stop being greedy and make content affordable. And stop paying stars stupid money

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they can monitor bittorrent and know the ports why not just block all ports? Pirates will find away to do there thing the ads on tv keep telling us they funded organized crime and this has been going on since cassettes where about. Media industry is the answer stop being greedy and make content affordable. And stop paying stars stupid money

 

Its not as simple as 'blocking ports', they can only monitor bit torrent traffic not control it.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Virgin Media are trialling yet more software/hardware to "sniff" what you are downloading! It is possible, I believe, to block web addresses easily enough. It is against the DPA and are to be challenged by the ICO over it.

I have not recieved any letter, dont expect to either, but if I did then I would be onto my ISP straight away and cancel my account. Until ISP's feel it in their pocket they will go the easy option route and give peoples details up.

I read on another, US based, site that ACS:Law are also being employed by another supplier of pornography to chase peeps. Will people pay up to avoid being called pervs? Its like being called a Rascist, easy to deny but impossible to prove your not.

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Media industry is the answer stop being greedy and make content affordable. And stop paying stars stupid money

 

I agree with what you say about the media industry being greedy. just look at sue bo's album she only receives 15% of all profit made the rest goes to the record company, yet thats still millions of pounds. If pirates can make copies (normally high quality CD copies) and sell them for a third of the price then surely the record companies can sell them at about half the current price and still make profit if not more profit from the extra sales it would encourage.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Virgin Media are trialling yet more software/hardware to "sniff" what you are downloading! It is possible, I believe, to block web addresses easily enough. It is against the DPA and are to be challenged by the ICO over it.

I have not recieved any letter, dont expect to either, but if I did then I would be onto my ISP straight away and cancel my account. Until ISP's feel it in their pocket they will go the easy option route and give peoples details up.

I read on another, US based, site that ACS:Law are also being employed by another supplier of pornography to chase peeps. Will people pay up to avoid being called pervs? Its like being called a Rascist, easy to deny but impossible to prove your not.

 

Im happy with my Virgin Broadband but if they were to start acting stupidly |id have no hesitation in taking my custom elsewhere.

 

Way back in the mists of time, you'll find that Davenport Lyon accused an innocent elderly couple with no PC guilty of downloading gay porn, this was pretty much the death knell for Davenport Lyons action against downloaders, Atari had been one of their biggest customers but they jumped ship soon after. after the bad publicity that this generated, sooner or later the same thing will happen to ACS.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speacking off bad publicity, has any whos received a letter from them actually contacted any national newspapers and told them that acs law are targeting innocent people and demanding money from them, just because their ip address was connected to something being downloaded even though they never downloaded or uploaded it for others to download?

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol anyone want to bet that swinton council will not take such letters demanding money lightly? i see a court case coming... swinton council v ACS Law. Am sure it will become well known if ACS law did send swinton council letters demanding payment, and am sure it will highlight the issue ACS Law has at actually proving who is responsible for downloading on 1 specific ip address, e.g the person that owns the ip address or the person that actually downloaded the material.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was on Radio 2 today, saying music piracy is now rife, i drive a school bus and have been quizzing kids on music downloads etc, and they tell me they can use mobile phones to connect to othere peoples networks and down load music go on face book etc and its all free

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was on Radio 2 today, saying music piracy is now rife, i drive a school bus and have been quizzing kids on music downloads etc, and they tell me they can use mobile phones to connect to othere peoples networks and down load music go on face book etc and its all free

 

yep its called bt openworld or somthing like that. plus similar free access networks through other peoples wifi connection both phones and laptops can access the network through your router or modem if they are within a certain distance. all though your private connection is still secure it still connects via the same ip address i believe, i may be wrong though

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep its called bt openworld or somthing like that. plus similar free access networks through other peoples wifi connection both phones and laptops can access the network through your router or modem if they are within a certain distance. all though your private connection is still secure it still connects via the same ip address i believe, i may be wrong though
This is frightening m8 so this means if you dont like one of your neighbours and they dont have there wifi secure i could go and dowload scooter etc and he could get a bill from ACS pirates.
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is frightening m8 so this means if you dont like one of your neighbours and they dont have there wifi secure i could go and dowload scooter etc and he could get a bill from ACS pirates.

 

This is nothing new, youll see from my previous post that I thought I'd try this out and downloaded an album using a neighbours connection, Talk Talk (I think) also published a report showing how easy this was and why the governments bill to disconnect file shares was seriously flawed.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is frightening m8 so this means if you dont like one of your neighbours and they dont have there wifi secure i could go and dowload scooter etc and he could get a bill from ACS pirates.

 

well their wifi for their own internet connection and private network is secure through the modem/router, but the openworld network that is also accessable from any modem/router is open for all to use and theres sod all we can do to stop them. But as i said i believe they both the same ip address with both connections going through your router or modem. So anyone walking pass can use your routers connection to access openworld network and download whatever the hell they like, and it be you that gets the ACAS letter through the door.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

Can I ask does anyone know who the other 5000 ISP's involved are?

 

What timescale do these letters normally operate under? Are people getting letters alleging infringements which have happened 2 years ago for instance?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

Can I ask does anyone know who the other 5000 ISP's involved are?

 

What timescale do these letters normally operate under? Are people getting letters alleging infringements which have happened 2 years ago for instance?

 

Thanks

I got my alleged accusation letter in June 09, it was alleging we made an illegal download about a year+ previous. we made this download (NOT) when we were on ower holls in the USA :mad: (apparently) :evil:. Up to now Tiscali/Talk-Talk, BT,Virgin,are a few who have rolled over without a fight and give out customers information.:evil:
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4930 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...