Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5509 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I received a fine for not surrendering a tax disc form Enfield court. I was paying but lost my job. I got a letter from Marstons on 18th March telling me to pay them £260.00. I wrote back to them on 20th March telling them I cannot afford to pay all at once and offering to pay £65 a month. I didn't hear anything from them, so I paid them online £65 on the 4th April and got a receipt through the post a couple of days later. I was planning to pay a further £65 tomorrow.

 

Anyway, just now a chap came to my door with a clipboard. I didn't answer the door and hel left me a red notice, half sticking out of my letterbox with a final notice and the fine has now gone up to £370!!!!!

 

How has it gone up this much???

And what shoud I do, the letter says they are coming back one evening this week?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Natalie

Take a look at my thread about Marstons from a couple of days ago -

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bailiffs-sheriff-officers/196514-bailiff-just-visited-fine.html

My husband wrote to them on Monday stating that the charges are fraudulent and that he has also writtem to the chief clark of the Magistrates court and spoken to the Judicial Complaints office, who also agreed the charges were excessive.

anyway he got a letter back from Marstons only today stating they are investigating it blah blah blah, seems to me they might be pooping themselves a bit as they've answered very quickly indeed and know they must be in the worng!

 

Good luck

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to send this leter in the morning, any thoughts?

 

Dear Sirs,

Please find attached a copy of the letter I sent you on 20th April.

I have today had a visit from one of your bailiffs, despite never receiving a reply to my first letter. I would like to know why this has happened and why you have added more charges?

I have proof of delivery of the letter and have today visited my local CAB and I have also had the help of Consumer Action Group. Both have advised me to make a complaint to the court about your unlawful actions and extortionate fees added to the account, which may amount to fraud.

I require you to remove these latest charges and send me a breakdown of the account. I also require you to deal with my first letter and offer of payment, the first instalment of which you have received.

Please respond to this letter within 7 days.

Yours Sincerley

Link to post
Share on other sites

nat- my reply might not warm the cockles of your heart but this is the situation,

 

by the time matters get to a bailiff- all opportunities have long passed for making /offering staged payments

 

the reason that bailiffs leave the letters poking slightly out of the letterbox is so that they will return a few hours later to see if it is still there- if not then they know someone is in!

 

sending them a payment along with your offer was a good move- it shows that it was not am empty gesture but unfortuneately you do not have the right to impose an offer of instalments on them

 

many people are unaware that bailiffs have to take out a bond (100,000 pounds) and have to agree when applying for a certificate to obey the orders of the court - the orders of the court on the warrant specifically state that they must collect the debt in full.

 

In the real world a last chance payment arrangement is sometimes made but naturally they are wary of offers of payment which only come about due to their visit so you have to be persistent with them and the original creditor or the court to try and persuade them that your intentions are serious and not just designed to get them off your back for a little longer

 

you started off right- just persist

 

 

however the warrant is for the FULL amount and the more work the bailiff has to do the higher the charges (to a limit)and so your part payment did not satisfy the warrant which is why the bailiff is entitled to continue with his actions

 

contact the clerk of the court which issued the warrant and tell them that you have already paid 65 and can you make payments direct to them and call the bailiff off

 

if you can go to the court in person to speak to the clerk it is always better than a phone call

 

also write to the bailiff company again recorded delivery ( with a copy of the original letter) as you have outlined above explaining your actions and ask for a breakdown of the costs that have been added and re visiting your request to continue with regular payments

 

 

i would strongly suggest that you remove the reference to possible fraud from your letter - you are asking these people to help you !

 

for the same reason i would also refrain from references to extortionate charges and unlawful actions until you have found out what the charges are for

 

i know i may make myself unpopular with some posters but contrary to popular opinion the charges are very tightly regulated by the court AND often the bailiff also has to adhere to strict guidlines from the creditors (especially councils) regarding how they act and what charges they make

 

i would be surprised if they have acted unlwafully, or commited fraud

 

i might agree with the charges being extortionate but these are laid doen by legislation

 

otherwise keep the door locked and talk to the bailiff through the letterbox or a window

 

my advice is intended to try and secure what you want (the bailiff off your back and the acceptance of your offer of payments)

 

softleee softlee chatchee monkee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry do not agree with what Diddydicky says - not a Bailiff by any chance are you?.

 

For one a Bailiff should conceal any notice they put through you letterbox in an envelope due to data protection, and not sticking out of your letterbox for your neighbours to see your business, tell them you intend to report the Bailliff for that offence too!

 

Secondly as advised by Contrails the contract is between the court and the Bailiffs, unless there is a court order for you to pay the bailiffs set fees etc then they cannot force you to.

 

Stick to your guns and contact the Office for Judiciary complaints, also speak to the Ministry of Justice, once these ****** Bailiffs know you mean business you'll be surprised how quick a response you'll get!

 

Oh and do add the word Fraud to the letter it's one word a Bailiff understands well enough as they commit it most days of their sad little lives!

 

Right on a rant now so gonna end there!

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

with regards to the letter in the letterbox - I told you why it was done- i didn't say i agreed with it such information surely is useful to people reading the posts

 

it is not an "offence" as you say and with respect- it tends to lower the value of your advice if you resort to doing exactly what you accuse the bailiffs of doing (making up alleged offences when no such offence exists)

 

you are correct it should be in an envelope but even if it is not and it is folded with the plain side out - how can anyone read it without removing it?

 

the fees that bailiffs charge are laid down and set out by negotiation and agreement with the courts and are very strictly policied ( contrary to what some posters may suggest) it is simple matter to ask for a copy of them or a print out of how they have been applied BEFORE resorting to threats of fraud and reporting people- of course some bailiffs (just like some bakers policemen, electricians, bankers, etc will be bad apples and break the rules you need to have the facts at hand before you make the accusations otherwise any other argument you put forward is diminished

 

On some of these threads some posters are sinking to the level that they accuse the bailiffs of- that of making unsubstantiated accusations and threats before obtaining the facts

 

my advice (yes i am a ex bailiff and ex policeman ) is exactly that-and hopefully some advice from the "other side" of the fence balances up some of the more "excitable" language and misinformed advice contained in some threads - if the original poster does not want my advice they only have to say and i will gladly get off the thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I am fuming!!!!!:mad:

I have got one of the **** sitting outside my house now, despite them having received my letter yesterday. He has been banging on my front door for 30 minutes and also banging on the window making the dogs bark!

 

What do I send them now, help please, this is making me a nervous wreck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails

And your door stays locked shut until police and bailiff are a safe distance from your property. Do not be persuaded by police to open a door.

 

Get everything on video.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police are here, he caled them saying that there was a baby crying in the house!

He is now saying that my boyfriend threatened him!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails

Take down in writing everything the police officer says.

 

The door stays locked shut!.

 

Ask the bailiff to quietly leave the property and ask the police officer to go with them.

 

There is no law requiring you to do business with a bailiff.

 

If anyone threatens you with a locksmith they commit an offence under S25 of the Theft Act 1968 and you will expect the police to investigate. Get everything on video when you ask them to leave your property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have all left now, but the police say that they will be investigating. What does anyone suggest I send Marstons now???

 

He was knocking on my door for over an hour!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails

Make copies of the document and report it to police for committing an offence under Section 25 of the Theft Act 1968. Bailiffs cannot threaten anyone with locksmiths. Example:

 

Contact the IPCC if the police fob you off with excuses or say its a civil matter, The police then commit an offence under Section 4 of the Criminal Law Act 1967.

 

Get your MP involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have filled in a form 4 complaint and have put the following:

 

I sent a letter to marstons on 30/03/2009 with an offer of payment, which they ignored. I paid the first instalment of the money I offered on 14/04/2009. They then sent a baliff round on 29/04/2009 and added £110 charges. He left a red letter poking out of my door and sat ouside my house for half an hour. I then sent another letter on 29/04/2009 by recorded delivery with a copy of the first letter asking them to deal with the first letter and remove the charges.

On 02 May 2009 at 9.25am another baliff started knocking on my door and proceeded to knock on the door, ring my doorbell and knock on the window for over an hour. When my friend asked him to leave as it was harrasment, he called the police saying that there was a baby in the house on its own and that my boyfriend threatened him, which he absolutley DID NOT. He then tried to get the police to let him in the house and get payment from me.

Both baliffs wrote the same name on the form but it was different people both times.

The second baliff left me with a distress warrant threatening me with a locksmith which if he does is an offence under Section 25 of the Theft act 1968.

 

 

How do I find out where the baliff got his certificate so I can send it to the right court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails
How do I find out where the baliff got his certificate so I can send it to the right court?

 

Phone the Ministry of Justice Public Register of Bailiffs on 020 3334 6355 and ask which court issued his certificate, then download the complaint form http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/form4_0606.pdf and send the form to the certificating court enclosing supporting evidence such as the bailiffs document showing the unlawful fees and any amounts paid.

 

Be very brief and factual in the wording of your complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you read something like this thread and then you read these bailiffs defending each others actions on these boards and have to come to the conclusion that they a scourge on society.

 

You are not wrong there!:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's difficult to be calm under stress, and feelings always run high on this subject, I should know I've been through it.

 

And after reading all the threads carefully, I think dd's posts were very useful because it's good to have the inside view.

 

I don't think he was defending the OP's bailiff either.

 

Oh and just for the record, if you want someone to blame for all this, start with your MP - unless they vote for it bad laws won't be passed.

 

If they can manage to vote themselves a smoking room at work..................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...