Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
    • Hello lovely, just posting to check in to see how you are feeling now? Hopefully your feeling better? 
    • Sorry my redactions made it harder dx. Tick dates are 11/12/2014
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA SAR Request


Stagparty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I recently wrote to MBNA using the standard letter on here requesting a SAR and enclosing a £10 postal order. They have replied saying that although they send statements to my address they want positive ID including a signature. I'm obviously wary of supplying a signature to them, can anyone suggest how to proceed?

 

Thanks in anticipation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

They never give up do they!

 

Yes they seem to be able to get away with asking for ID, (quoting Data Protection of course), but their is no requirement for you to give them your sig.

 

Suggest you photocopy ID to send them and if it has your sig - blank it out.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ICO has confirmed (i understand) to others here that in a case where the creditor has been writing to you by name.. using your address, quoting an account number and even demanding payments.. then they know FULL WELL who you are and it is unreasonable of them to suggest that all of a sudden they have doubts about your identity.

 

Certainly, if you haven't had any communication from them for a long while (months/years) they have a duty to ascertain your ID but these attempts are usually just a method to get hold of your signature and/or further information about you.

 

Their reply is seen mostly as a frivolous attempt at avoiding giving you information you are entitled to. Therefore write back and inform them that, under the above circumstances, their request is unwarranted and your request for information stands. If they fail to agree, make a formal complaint to the ICO and enclose previous correspondence showing that MBNA know exactly who they have been communicating with.

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stagparty, for some reason this keeps happening to me (hmm, think I need to read the dummies guide again). If you go to search at the top and type in MBNA debt bought by Link - don't know what to do - can anyone help please? It should bring it up for you.

Not sure what to do about the SAR thing, I will keep looking for the letter cos I know I saw it here somewhere. If not, I’ll try and put something together along the lines of davey77’s advice.

 

 

 

What are you going to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll have a look for the letter too, if you find it before me would you please be good enough to either post a link here or send me a PM?

 

I'd much rather be able to quote chapter and verse at them so they can't wriggle too much - prefer to see them squirm :D

 

Also if anyone else can point us in the right direction there are at least 2 CAGGERS who will be grateful to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know the rule is never speak on the phone, but could you not ring em, complete the security questions (which they calss as ID'ing you) and confirm you have made the request.that way you have no issue with sending a signature? just a thought....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

How about putting your own signature box on the letter and signing over it to prevent copying. I'd still put XX through it too as 42man says and of course it wouldn't stop a creative hand forger! How about handwriting your full name or changing it from your normal sig in a unique way, then scan a copy of the letter before you send it. Geeez we wouldn't be so paranoid if we didn't know what dirty tricks people get up to!!

Knocked this signature strip up in photoshop (help yourselves :) ):

sigstrip.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry SP, have been looking for the letter but without luck. But I did happen across more template letters and it looks like the SAR I sent was incorrect (what a twit), so have sent the one that I found (by 42man) much more info requested on it than the previous one I sent and I signed it with crosses through. I’m sure that a signature done like that will be ok and ‘unliftable’.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help Davey, has anyone else had a similar response from MNBA? And if so, did they capitulate and provide the information requested?

 

Hi Stagparty

 

Yes, had the same problem they asked for a copy of my pastport or driving licence for ID.

I replied i've not got either a pastport or driving licence.

If you write back saying the above, your get a letter please contact them by phone which i did in the end. It's only a couple of security questions you answer and that's about it.

 

Gaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gazza

 

Thanks for that - it looks as if I got an identical letter to you. I was thinking of replying along the lines that neither are available, certainly not to be sent through the post, and that they had been happily communicating with me by letter about none SAR related matters. I was also going to offer to send them a private message on their website. As you've managed to get them to accept details over the phone I might just call them myself. Once again thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you reply by phone (and i wouldnt anyway) make sure you 141 the call so they don't get your number

 

also if they dont know who you are how do they know who you are on the phone

 

personally i would reply and be straight with them

 

quote the advise straight from post 4 above and tell them that they have been writing to you at that address and disclosing sensitive information for a long time without requiring identity or signature and that you beleive that the real purpose in now asking for this information is an attempt to thwart your request.

 

tell them simply that your signature will be "crossed" on your letter for security purposes

 

start off as you mean to go on and let them know that you are not going to play their games or sing to their tune

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sirs,

 

RE Account NO XXXXXXXX

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/2009 in which you say that you will not comply with my request dated xxx under s.78(1) of the `Consumer Credit Act 1974 unless I provide you with a signature.

 

There is no requirement under the Act that require a s.78(1) request to be accompanied by a signature, and I am unable to accede to your request.

 

Further, I note that you have sent statements and correspondence containing sensitive private information to me at same address as that detailed in my s.78(1) request. If you are concerned that you are corresponding with the correct person I wonder why you have not verified the information before.

 

As you are aware, disclosing data without adequate checks of identity is contrary to the 7th principal of data protection, listed in schedule 1 of the Data protection Act 1998. The time to confirm my identity was before you sent your first threat letter.

 

My request for a true copy of my credit agreement under section 78(1) was made on xx/xx/2009 and the 12 working days for your compliance expire on xx/xx/2009. I note that there is no provision that removes the requirements of the act to provide this information on time, even if you are unsure of my identity.

 

Please now comply with your legal obligation without further delay.

 

 

adapt CAA for SAR and put in the other sentances suggested

Link to post
Share on other sites

MBNA sold my debt to Cabot 10yrs ago, but thought i would send SAR to see what they had. They requested ID so had my son knock me up a near identical drivers licence with fake sig, just in case, and it was sufficient for them.

 

2 letters confirming no CCA available, bits n bobs of data, but the surprise was that after 10yrs they still had my details on file.

 

I then asked them to remove data, but they have replied stating that I signed agreement giving my permission to process data (no CCA available remember) and so they are allowed. I contacted ICO and they informed me that as there is no specific date line for holding data it is up to each co to determine "reasonable time"!! In effect forever.

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on the comments by Diddy how would something like this suffice?

 

Dear Sirs

 

Re:STAGPARTY

 

I refer to your letter of x and must confess I am surprised to note you have returned both my letter and postal order and decided you need "positive proof" of my identity. Whilst I must applaud your apparent desire to safeguard my identity I must enquire why you choose to do it now rather than, for example, you passed my details to RMA in order for them to attempt to harrass me or when you wrote to me regarding the budget form I sent you? If I were being cynical I would be forced to conclude that letter is merely an attempt thwart or delay my request.

 

There is no requirement in the Data Pretection Act for me to provide my signature, I am though happy to enclose a recent utility bill as further evidence of my address.

 

I have also enclosed the original letter outlining my request together with the £10 postal order and look forward to you now complying with the requirements of the Data Protection Act without further delay. Should you choose not to comply with my lawful request I will have little option but to report the matter to the Information Commissioner.

 

Luv n hugs

SP

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL Diddy, I know you said to adapt it but I didn't quite know how - I'm still new to all this and finding it all quite bemusing. Does my proposed reply look ok? Thanks for your help - it IS appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...