Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So I just found a couple abandoned traffic cones locally by some bins.   A bit squished but free!  So have placed them on the land.  Will wait to see if the cones get moved and signs ignored again this week before I consider rocks/ boulders.
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5527 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I built up considerable arrears of counil tax when I was ill and had a less than supportive partner. I fell ill in late 2004, was quite badly treated by the 'Leave & Die', which is the subject of a complaint, developed severe depression as a result of the heart problem being undiagnosed, was admitted for depression in 2005, sectioned 2006. Finally had angioplasty in Nov 2007. My then partner was working part time, and supposedly covering the council tax. However as I became more active it became obvious she wasn't. I had to have her and her kids removed by the police in July 2008 and informed the council of my circumstances as I was on incapacity benefit so the payment structure would have to change. They then took me to court as 'I hadn't made an offer in my letter'. This was in addition to the previous arrears from the previous year. I offered to pay £10 a fortnight out of my incapacity which was more than I was supposed to bu stated in a letter to them to stop any action as I was going to return to work in the autumn term. They sent the account ( some 840 quid ) to Pheonix in August for the previous year despite me being on benefit and a 'vulnerable' person, I asked to be discharged from the Mental Health Services in November as I needed to get back to work. Come December I was pleased as I had paid off all the arrears for 2008-9 but received a letter from Pheonix saying their agent will call in 7 days to collect 1067 pounds ( previous year ). I had just received a rather negative response from the Healthcare Commission so was in a very poor state of mind. Coupled with this demand I went downhll pretty rapidly and wrote to Phoenix and LBC stating that if anybody would try to take any of my property, I wold do something daft...I was quite serious, and had made arrangements for the animals and changed my will to prevent the ex from benefiting. I also went down to the council and stated the same thing, which resulted in the council bod looking at the ceiling a lot. The recovery team said they would do nothing and I should speak to Phoenix...I had asked for a 30 day stay so as to begin working again and sort out an installment plan. LBC wrote a 2 line letter of reply back saying talk to the bailiffs, Pheonix wrote a 2 line letter back saying speak to their agent. The nice bailiff man appeared, put my car on the form ( which I needed to work ) and an old car which I had just sold on e-bay to raise money to pay off the debt. I gave hime 334 and he gave me 10 days to find the rest, there was no discussion of installments. I immediately gave all the stuff I had inherited from my parents to friends in case the worst happened. I had injured myself in the meantime, and they clubbed together and I got a small loan at a ridiculous rate of interest. Since coming onto the forums here I have noticed on the form he left..an 'enforcement fee'...I believe this to be spurious as from what I can gather that is charged AFTER a levy has been made and that figure is laid down in statute. It amounted to £165.

 

Subsequent to that I have received another demand from LBC.which is valid...but they used the wrong acc number on it...I had been told I was up to date on the one I was using..and I ended up going to court despite e-mailing and writing to them 8 times giving full details and disputing it...I turned up, and was told I didn't need to be there....I did point out that I had been offered work that day ( if I don't work I don't get paid ), and would be seeking to be compensated for that, and was told that was discussed in the letter posted the day before ( it arrived after the weekend...nothing was in it ) I have given them until the 27th to respond or I will take them to the small claims court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since coming onto the forums here I have noticed on the form he left..an 'enforcement fee'...I believe this to be spurious as from what I can gather that is charged AFTER a levy has been made and that figure is laid down in statute. It amounted to £165

 

Ok, so when the bailiff called and levied upon your car he charged what? What was the debt he was collecting?

 

Using Schedule 5 you can work out how much he was entitled to charge. see: The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

 

 

2.—(1) In heads A and B of the Table to paragraph 1, "the relevant amount" with respect to a visit or a levy means—

(a) where the sum due at the time of the visit or of the levy (as the case may be) does not exceed £100, £12.50,

(b) where the sum due at the time of the visit or of the levy (as the case may be) exceeds that amount, 12½ per cent. on the first £100 of the sum due, 4 per cent. on the next £400, 2½ per cent. on the next £1,500, 1 per cent. on the next £8,000 and ¼ per cent. on any additional sum;

and the sum due at any time for these purposes means so much of the amount in respect of which the liability order concerned was made as is outstanding at the time.

 

(2) Where a charge has arisen under head B with respect to an amount, no further charge may be aggregated under heads A or B in respect of that amount.

 

 

Start there.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Chris, the debt was for council tax, for £844.29, his charges were ;

 

Levy charge £49

Walking Possession Fee £12

Enforcement Fee £165

 

I found something else out last night as a result of looking on one of the links through the forums here;

 

From Specification for Private Enforcement Provision Schedule 4 HMCS and DCA

 

Section 6.31

 

"The contractor shall not take action to levy distress without prior reference to the court if the defaulter............appears to suffer from severe physical or any mental disability"

 

I bet Pheonix didn't stick to this one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you contacted your local councillor? They can ask for a review of the council's actions in your case.

I would also contact your local MP - whose responsibility it is for voting for bad laws that allow councils and bailiffs to act as they do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Chris I have been in contact with my local MP and sam sending her copies of all paperwork, as well as a formal complaint to the council and Phoenix, and have given them until the end of the month to reply. What regulatory/other organisations should I write to? I have thought about trading Standards and the Local Government Ombudsman?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need a little clarification here;

 

1st visit ( not filled in )

2nd visit ( not filled in )

Levy charge £49

Walking Possession Fee £12

Enforcement Fee £165

Administration Fee ( not filled in )

 

He was on his own ( and in the same tatty red van as he was in when he picked up the money after 10 days ) nothing was taken at the time so I would presume the levy was all he was allowed to charge...so the £165 enforcement fee is bunk?

 

I have written to Phoenix asking them to explain their fees and have asked for an answer by 1st May ( recorded delivery of course ) I may SAR them this weekend. Any other advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need a little clarification here;

 

1st visit ( not filled in )

2nd visit ( not filled in )

Levy charge £49

Walking Possession Fee £12

Enforcement Fee £165

Administration Fee ( not filled in )

 

He was on his own ( and in the same tatty red van as he was in when he picked up the money after 10 days ) nothing was taken at the time so I would presume the levy was all he was allowed to charge...so the £165 enforcement fee is bunk?

 

I have written to Phoenix asking them to explain their fees and have asked for an answer by 1st May ( recorded delivery of course ) I may SAR them this weekend. Any other advice?

 

 

 

The "enforcement fee" is really an "attending to remove" fee. HOWEVER there is plenty of case law that makes it very clear that for this to be charged there must be a VALID LEVY in place.

 

There is a levy fee and I would suspect that a "levy" has been put on a motor vehicle outside. Did the bailiff provide any documentation?

 

You need to ask for a complete breakdown of the account and that in this respect you would prefer to receive a copy of the screen shot of your account and that if this request is refused you will be copying your letter and their response to the Information Commissioners Officer (ICO).

 

This should work !!

 

PS: Please ask for confirmation of the name of the bailiff who visited...and confirmation that he is certificated to work for Phoenix !!!!

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you tomtubby, will write with full details when I return home. This was the first time I had seen him. He arrived at around 8.30am. I said I did not have to let him in, he said he would have my car removed ( subsequently as I need this for my job as a supply teacher he would not have been able to do this ), so let him in. The levy and the enforcement fee appeared on the document he left with me at the same time. There was no discussion about installments, I gave him £340 and he gave me 10 days to find the other 740 odd. I am confused in that I thought an 'enforcement fee' or attendance fee...could only be charged AFTER a levy had been made...not at the same time inn the same visit. He was on his own and in the same red van he later came in to pick up the rest of the money. I did repeat my threats to my own welfare I had put in writing...but he ignored then..see section 6.31 above ( not enforceable by law but 'good practice'....I found that in the last week looking through here )

 

Thanks for responding

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back home. Sequence of events was this;

 

07/01/09 Bailiff arrived made note of car registrations on the drive. He was on his own. He then came to the door....what happened is described in the post above. What he left me with was a 'Notice of Siezure of Goods and Inventory'.

 

Both cars were put on the form my own ( which was vital for me to do my job ) and the ex's old one she had given back to pay off the debts she left me with ( ha ha ) which had been sold on E-bay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found this on:

 

Costs and Fees - Debt Help UK

 

Council Tax and Community Charge

 

The Bailiff visits the premises but does not gain entry:

  • 1st visit - £20
  • 2nd visit - £15

The Bailiff gains entry, lists and takes "possession" of the goods (the goods are not necessarily removed):

  • Debt less than £100: £20
  • Debt more than £100:
    • 20% of first £100
    • 4% of the next £400
    • 2% of the next £1500

The bailiff makes one attendance with a vehicle and intends to remove goods (where the bailiff has previously gained entry, listed, taken "possession" but not removed the goods):

  • Reasonable costs and fees: Around £50.

The bailiff removes and stores goods: reasonable costs and fees.

The bailiff takes walking possession of the goods (the debtor has signed a walking possession agreement): £10.00.

 

A bit more;

It may be possible to get the bailiff withdrawn if there are Special Circumstances. The debtor should contact:

  • the creditor if they have a County Court Judgement;
  • or the Council if they owe Council Tax or Community Charge;
  • or the Magistrates Court if they owe a fine;

and inform them of any Special Circumstances, ask for the bailiff not to be used, and if it is possible to make a new payment arrangement.

Special Circumstances are usually defined as:

Serious illness, mental impairment, learning difficulties, physical disability, long term sickness, unemployment, recent bereavement, severe financial difficulties.

 

However North Somerset concil seem to condone 'attendance fees as valid'

http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/cairo/docs/doc15176.pdf

 

Merton

 

Bailiff Service - Merton Council

 

Medway

 

History

 

Birmingham

 

How To Deal With The Bailiff

 

Derby

BAILIFFS This actually states that a attendence fee can be charged AFTER a visit had already been made ( walk-in possession )

 

anyway..enough for now....think I can go after them bigtime

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...