Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap One - CCA


mashmallow
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5467 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, why do you think Cap1 have not issued court proceedings, they have the perfect vehicle through freds/bryan carter to do so.

 

They DO NOT have a leg to stand on that's why!, as is the case with every single one i have seen on here.

 

They will eventually sell it to the likes of lowell, (as they have done with mine) Tune in for more episodes on my thread with cap1!

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe you are right, they have all these powers and we are just skint flints

so yes why don't they just take me to Court you have hit the nail. I am going for gold now will let you know. Thanks a mill for your input.

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

2u7t9g1.gif

 

Make a complaint to your local trading standards & the OFT with regards to their harassment and threats, they are in clear breach of OFT guidelines & CPUT ;

 

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/DebtCollectionComplaintForm.DOC

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Contact us

 

[email protected]

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Debt collection practices

 

tel: 020 7211 5823

Debt collection guidance - Final guidance on unfair business practices - oft664

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally i would just wait for freds to pass it to the infamous Bryan Carter outfit (their sister solicitor firm), and take it from there (many threads on carter here):D

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

:(

Cerb,

 

Sorry to be thick I looked on the links you gave me but not sure which letter of comjplaint do I send to the OFT etc and also do I write to Freds and tell them I have reported them. If you have time please could you help.

 

Regards,

 

 

Mashmallow

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first link is a complaint form you can download a fill in.

 

The second is a link to the OFT website'

 

The third is an OFT email address who you can contact directly to complain.

 

Don't bother contacting Freds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Members,

 

After receiving a letter from Freds, got another letter from Cap 1 today.

I don't know what is going on but after sending a complain to the TS which I done today and after sending the CPR 31.16 I get this:-

 

As I've already explained in accordance with section 78 1983 we have provided you with with a copy of your original agreement bla bla bla. Your account status remains in default. We do not accept that your request satisfies the criteria at CPR 31.16, we do not believe that a copy of your original agreement would have to be disclosed under CPR31.6 as part of our standard disclosure obligations. In essence it is your case that you are entiled to a copy of the org agreement it is in our case that you are not. This is for the court to decide. The disclosure will not help the court to decide. We shall refer this letter to the court if regardless of the above you decide to make an application under CPr etc., You now have the option of contaction the FO. What on earth does this mean and what do i do now.

 

Please help.

 

Regards,

 

Mashmallow

 

XX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent CPR 31 to cap one only to get a letter from Freds chasing the debt again. Recent letter they sent I have attached, can anyone tell me what they mean and what do I send them.

 

Thanks

 

 

Mashallow

Edited by mashmallow
send id details by mistake
Link to post
Share on other sites

Now where have I seen that letter before :confused: Oh, yes, I have one filed too :D

 

Not much you can do, I think. You've pretty much done all you can to get a copy from them. They are not going to change their position. The only option now is they take you to court and you get them to disclose the agreement as part of the proceedings.

 

I send Ms Renshaw this letter

 

I DO NOT AKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

 

Dear Ms Renshaw

 

Re: *ACCOUNT NUMBER* ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

Re: My request under Sections 77-79 of the Consumer Credit act 1974

 

Thank you for your letter dated *DATE* and your further letter dated 2 *DATE*, the contents of which have been noted. However, the reply received by me does not fulfill your obligations under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The Act demands that I be supplied with a true copy of any properly executed credit agreement that exists in relation to the above alleged account. I may ask for this on demand providing that a fee of £1.00 is paid. This fee was sent with my original letter dated *DATE*, upon receipt of the original request the specified account legally entered into disputed status.

 

My request remains outstanding. A generic credit card agreement does not constitute a true copy of a credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account and that which you have sent does not contain all of the prescribed terms that the Act calls for and is not properly executed. In addition, the generic credit card agreement does not state the account number. The current ‘conditions’ sent are irrelevant. I also require you to provide full details of all payments/interest/charges/balances to the account since its alleged inception to date.

 

As you will know, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, a judge is not permitted to make any enforcement order unless the creditor can provide a true, signed copy of the original credit agreement. This means that unless you can provide such an agreement, this alleged debt is not enforceable in law.

 

You had until *DATE*to provide me with the true copy I requested. After that date you entered into default of my request. Whilst the account is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest to the account, nor make any further charges to the account. Additionally, you are not entitled to register any information on this account with any credit reference agencies (or any third party and you may not legally transfer this alleged debt to any debt collection agency).

 

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the data subject to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement, so until you produce such an agreement, you do not have consent to share my information.

 

I respectfully ask you to remove any default references or data added to my credit file.

The requirement for consent to share data is a clear requirement of the Data Protection Act 1998. Any such attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

 

The time limits, which are laid down in the Consumer Credit (prescribed periods for giving information) Regulations 1983 are clear. You must supply an executed credit agreement within 12 working days of a proper CCA request. If you fail to comply with a legitimate request the account enters a default situation.

 

Therefore you have until the *DATE* to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint, otherwise your conduct may be reported to the Office of Fair Trading, the Financial Ombudsman and Trading Standards, Any investigation undertaken by them may affect your ability to offer credit in the future.

 

In summary, I will not be making any further payments to you until you provide me with the documents I have requested. Should you not have any signed credit agreement in relation to this alleged debt, please confirm this in writing to me.

 

I look forward to your reply

 

Edit to suit your circumstances.

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...