Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2 defaults Egg and Vodaphone - Default hell!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4864 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI, Just seeking some advice,

 

A recent copy of my credit report showed 2 defaults Egg and Vodaphone which are causing me considerable trouble! I cannot even open a new current account as a result!

 

A couple of years ago i was forced to go into a debt management plan with the Consumer Credit Counselling Service (CCCS) due to financial mess i was in and i have been in my debt plan now for over 2 years and it has been fantastic.

 

I have however noted that Egg had put a default on my report even though for the last 18 months they have received high payments from me well above minumim levels (though in fairness i did for first couple months pay less than minimum by agreement with them through CCCS). When i called Egg about this last week they have very kindly agreed to now remove the default entirely so my report will show i have never defaulted because i am paying well now and the debt is half repaid.This was of course gret news for me..so optimistically i attempted to roll on and try to tackle the next one

 

In relation to the second default, it was vodaphone (a mere £120!) and i had in fact settled this debt in full with the agency last year, vodaphone are however refusing to remove this default at all. Incidentally i do not even recall ever having a default notice from them, just a letter form their debt collectors!

 

is there any resolution to this nightmare? I have read the helpful "how to remove default notice thread" and I am considering trying this with Vodaphone?

 

Any thoughts most welcome.

 

Incidentally does an "arrangement to pay" on a credit report presumably also cause difficulties which is what I have with Northern Rock

 

lady of Limited Means Sarrah K x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 460
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think the best way to get this one removed is to write a letter to them asking them to provide you with true, signed copies of the following;

 

The original credit agreement

The Original Default notice

 

If they can't provide either of then the default is illegal because of different reasons, so you need to post when you get a reply.

 

I will copy/paste an example letter i wrote if you would like to use it.?

 

It has worked twice for me...

 

Neo

  • Confused 1

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be fantastic if you could Neo, thank you. i thnk I may have a chance with Vodaphone as when I spoke to them on the telephone, they could not provide me with the account history as they recently took over Singlepoint whom my original account was through and so have lost the info... i am hopeful..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Date

Account Number/Reference:

Dear Sir/Madam,

After recently obtaining a copy of my credit file from Expedia, Experian & CallCredit [Delete as appropriate], I am concerned to note that your company has placed a "Default" notice against an account I held with you.

Further to this, I have no recollection of ever receiving such a notice, and I therefore require you to substantiate this data.

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit). Your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 cheque to cover the statutory fee.

2. Please also supply me with a signed, true and certified copy of the original default notice.

3. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not under S189 of the CCA 1974.

I would request that this data is provided to me within the next 14 days. If you are unable to provide this data then I require all adverse information to be removed completely, including any defaults that may have been applied. Please note that mere correction or amendment to the entry will not be acceptable.

Yours faithfully,

You

Please remember to put the cheque in for £1.00!

This letter has worked for next Directory and Natwest Credit Cards

  • Haha 6
  • Confused 3

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey no problem, keep us informed to your progress and I have a letter 2 which i have used in case they come back and play dumb, etc.

 

Good luck

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

I would leave it as is, because that fact is irrelevant really.

 

I have had a default wiped off mty credit record last week using this letter. Nice :)

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay people... you're all looking at lots of paperwork (which is fine), but there's a little nugget of shiny stuff embedded deep within the bowels of the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

Ladies and Gentlemen, a little known fact about the Data Protection Act and credit reference agencies and automated searches:

 

You are legally entitled, under Part II, Section 12 (1) of the Data Protection Act to insist that no agency can use your data for automated purposes including... and I quote from the said Act...[drumroll]...

 

(1) An individual is entitled at any time, by notice in writing to any data controller, to require the data controller to ensure that no decision taken by or on behalf of the data controller which significantly affects that individual is based solely on the processing by automatic means of personal data in respect of which that individual is the data subject for the purpose of evaluating matters relating to him such as, for example, his performance at work, his creditworthiness, his reliability or his conduct. ...[tada...takes deep bow]:p

 

Okay, what does it mean in English...

Whilst credit ref agencies can store the data, you (and only you...not them... YOU, the "individual"/data subject/etc) can decide if you want that data to be included in any automated processes which includes the automatic reference transactions that banks and Co. send through for ref checks.

 

You may, if you so wish, ...(and the agencies can't do diddly-squat about it)... insist that your data is excluded from the automation process, and that it can only be utilised within manual reference purposes... which by the way, none of the agencies have the ability to process.:D

 

If you think I'm joking, I've done it for all three of the ref agencies, and they've all had to remove all my data from the automation process because I threatened them with a Court Order if they failed to do so.

 

So, what happens in reality. Well, maybe try what I did...

 

1) Send them a recorded delivery letter along these lines...

"Dear Sirs,

 

This is a formal notice, served under the provisions of Chapter 29 of the Data Protection Act 1998 in requesting that you conform to my demand for a change in the manner in which you hold and process subject data about me.

 

As you are no doubt aware, Schedule II, Section 12 (1) of the said Act allows all data subjects the right to insist on the removal of any and all data from automated processes in repsect of matters relating to them. I have reproduced that clause for your information, in case you do not have a copy to hand:

[insert clause from above in quotes].

 

You will note the exact language of the Act, in that such a request may be made in relation to a number of different reference checks "which significantly affects that individual", and the Acts specifically cites

"credit worthiness" as one of those examples.

 

Recent checks on my file have caused severe complications, and now "significantly affect" my everyday life, and that of my family. An additional point to note is that issues of this nature that adversely affect "normal family life" are in breach of the Human Rights Act.

 

Therefore, you have seven days from receipt of this letter to remove all such data from your system where it is referenced and processed via automated processes. You will obviously need to transfer it to your manual process system and alert your customers that my data can no longer be searched via an automatic process.

 

I look forward to receiving your confirmation that the above change has been made to my file at the end of that seven day period.

 

To that end, I look forward to receiving your confirmation by close of business of ...[date it nine days hence to give them time].

 

Yours, etc"

 

I did this to Experian, Equifax and myCallCredit last month. Equifax argued the toss initially, then I issued an N1 Court Form against them, and as soon as they got that they capitulated. By the way, they also had to pay the Court fee. :D

 

Of course, they don't actually have anything on their system that can manage a manual intervention on a credit check, so they have to bar all the data from being read.

 

The other tact is the contractual issue, and this is even easier.

 

Background, last year I cancelled my contract (after 2 years) with Orange to switch to another telecom. Orange (conveniently) forgot to cancel my contract and tried charging me up to 3 months of additional monthly tariffs.

I refused to pay, Orange got arsey, so I threatened them with a counter if they tried the recovery route, with copies of my letters and the Rec Deliv numbers of my cancellation letters.

A letter from them the next week... "blah, blah, as a gesture of goodwill, we have cancelled the £30 owed...etc.". OWED!!!!:evil: I'll give them firkin "owed" - cheeky bar stewards. Anyway, after I calmed down...

 

I noted about a month later that Orange had put three months of unpaid bills onto my credit files, so I had an "Up to 3 months late" marker on my file which is just about up there with a CCJ or default. I told them to adjust the data, they refused, so I sent the following within letters to Experian, Equifax and MyCallCredit:

 

"...As to the Orange account staying on my file for six years, you should note that this was not a defaulted account at all. I gave Orange notice to switch to another provider and they didn't process my cancellation in time. I then refused to pay the months after my notice of cancellation. They have now recognised this by asking all the agencies to remove the alledged late payment information..."

The agencies got hold of Orange who then cleared the 1,2 and 3 markers BUT left the account as default/settled.

 

The agencies all wrote back saying that they could keep such a reference on the file for up to six years.

 

I then sent the following to all three:

 

"... As to the Orange account staying on my file for six years, you should note that this was not a defaulted account at all and, even if it was, you are no longer permitted to hold such data on my file.

 

Upon signing my contract with Orange, I only gave Orange my permission to log my account dealings whilst the contract was in place. If you read the wording of that contract it states quite clearly that I "give permission for Orange to supply credit reference agencies with information relating to the conduct and payment history of my account." I neither agreed to any other purposes, nor did I agree for that clause to include the term "in perpetuity".

 

Additionally, the contract also states that "this agreement may be cancelled by either party in writing".

 

That contract is now (very) cancelled (and has been for some time now) and therefore they have no signed mandate or permission to instruct you to retain or store data on me.

 

Schedule I, Part 1 "The Principles" of the Act states, quite clearly in Clause 5:

 

"5. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes."

 

So, you will kindly remove the entire record, or I will issue a Formal Notice on this matter. If you fail to comply with that Notice, then I will apply for an N1 County Court Order against you, which will result in you accruing Court fees and any other legal expenses and disbursements. This will also lead to a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office as to your suitability to hold a Data Protection licence when you are clearly holding data that is no longer relevant to the account, the account information provider or the data subject, and is being held after a contract has been terminated, by whatever means, whether by default or cancellation."

 

The entry was removed within two days.

 

So, my friends, we have a few extra strings to our bow on this front, go spread the gospel...:)

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1

I'm often a sarcastic SOB and speak my mind (and I don't do PC at all), but I have a laugh as I go. I won't be intimidated, and I don't take prisoners... so live with it, or go get yourself a humour implant :p

 

Copy of Law book from Amazon…£19.95, Refund Request stamp...32p, LBA stamp...also 32p, Court fees...£750.00,

The look on the bank's barrister's face, when they lost the '£25k Mother-of-all unfair charges' cases...(plus his £8k+ of costs)... Priceless!

 

The legal bit: These are my opinions and own view of legislation and process. I accept no liability whatsoever for any outcome as a result of anyone invoking any or all of the advice given - clarify your own personal stuation with an insured legal professional.

Saying that, I've used these methods against many of these corporate crooks:evil: and won hands down!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

xr537

 

so does this mean that you can get credit if you got a bad credit record by using the above letter???

Halifax

Settled in Full

Cap One

Settled in Full

Citi Card

Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've no idea about whether you can get credit, what it simply means is that you can get all credit data removed from automated purposes... the bank that you are applying to may get a nil result if your file has been removed from the 'automated' system.

 

and secondly, use your contract to get any adverse data removed after the contract has been cancelled, terminated or voided. If they send you a letter along the lines of "we consider the account in default and have terminated the contract, etc."

 

...then my argument is (and was what I used) that they have nullified your permission to supply credit reference data.

 

I didn't actually have a bad credit file, just lots of silly annoying bits of data that I was getting fed up with.

 

By the way, do actually check that the contract does state that they will provide data to ref agencies... I have heard of two that didn't, and the persons affected issued a formal complaint against the companies involved for distributing their data withour permission, which is a criminal offence, and got compensation!!

 

Basically, if everyone in the UK refused to have their data processed automatically and chose the opt-out clause (that hardly anyone knows you can use)... how would the reference agencies cope??? :D

I'm often a sarcastic SOB and speak my mind (and I don't do PC at all), but I have a laugh as I go. I won't be intimidated, and I don't take prisoners... so live with it, or go get yourself a humour implant :p

 

Copy of Law book from Amazon…£19.95, Refund Request stamp...32p, LBA stamp...also 32p, Court fees...£750.00,

The look on the bank's barrister's face, when they lost the '£25k Mother-of-all unfair charges' cases...(plus his £8k+ of costs)... Priceless!

 

The legal bit: These are my opinions and own view of legislation and process. I accept no liability whatsoever for any outcome as a result of anyone invoking any or all of the advice given - clarify your own personal stuation with an insured legal professional.

Saying that, I've used these methods against many of these corporate crooks:evil: and won hands down!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok this sounds very clever but i am very confused... does this mean that defaults can be removed altogether or just that no one can find out about them??!!

 

bongobaz said:
so how would a bank of credit card company look at a credit report that was nil???

good or bad??

 

good question.. what response would be bank etc have when they tried to do a search of your credit file??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit applications are based on individual organisations' view of the credit score which, in turn, is based on the information provided by the agencies.

 

How one bank or institution wishes to process the result is up to them - however, this thread was, I believe, a discussion about ways in which to remove default entries. The examples I have given were two methods used by me which worked. Whether it would affect someone elses rating in the same manner I don't know and don't profess to guess at. Maybe you could use method two (what I call the 'expired' accounts way) to start cleaning up your file.

 

All I will say is that having removed two accounts that were in default, and then removing all historic accounts completely, has not affected my ability to get credit, and have just taken out two more phone accounts. However, that should also be viewed in the context that I also have a lot of the other 'plus' factors that are taken into account when credit scoring applications, namely marital status, 2 dependants, job type, length of employment, salary band, time at residence, homeowner, etc. All these, and more, are used in the overall score calculation.

 

My response was simply to help Sarrahk look at ways to remove (what she considered were) unfair and defaulted data entries - I'm not going to get into a long discussion about credit scoring, as that is whole area in itself, simply because nearly all organisations score the results differently.

 

In summary, use a combination of all the methods on these forums, try the 'where's my default notice' route, if that fits better. If you're in a position where you've nothing to lose, go the route suggested above.

  • Haha 1

I'm often a sarcastic SOB and speak my mind (and I don't do PC at all), but I have a laugh as I go. I won't be intimidated, and I don't take prisoners... so live with it, or go get yourself a humour implant :p

 

Copy of Law book from Amazon…£19.95, Refund Request stamp...32p, LBA stamp...also 32p, Court fees...£750.00,

The look on the bank's barrister's face, when they lost the '£25k Mother-of-all unfair charges' cases...(plus his £8k+ of costs)... Priceless!

 

The legal bit: These are my opinions and own view of legislation and process. I accept no liability whatsoever for any outcome as a result of anyone invoking any or all of the advice given - clarify your own personal stuation with an insured legal professional.

Saying that, I've used these methods against many of these corporate crooks:evil: and won hands down!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

xr537,

 

Genius I must say, I was looking at the same sections in the DPA, but couldn;t work out a way to apply them. I think the questions on all our minds are:

 

a) Have you applied for credit since you have 'cleared' your records,

b) Have you checked your credit records since? What does it show, just blank or have the simply made the adverse info 'good'

c) Finally, do you know if your credit records still exist?

 

Thanks

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In response to the above three questions:

a) Yes - took out two more mobile contracts last month for the family and both went through fine. Also, changed credit card provider and credit check was fine. Also, had a job contract credit check undertaken (I work within secure industries) and that came back okay.

b) Yes - entries just show as old "no-activity" entries. The two former default accounts were removed altogether

c) Yes, credit records still exist on their computers - I can log in online to them. However, if I do an automated score on them, it doesn't work.;)

I'm often a sarcastic SOB and speak my mind (and I don't do PC at all), but I have a laugh as I go. I won't be intimidated, and I don't take prisoners... so live with it, or go get yourself a humour implant :p

 

Copy of Law book from Amazon…£19.95, Refund Request stamp...32p, LBA stamp...also 32p, Court fees...£750.00,

The look on the bank's barrister's face, when they lost the '£25k Mother-of-all unfair charges' cases...(plus his £8k+ of costs)... Priceless!

 

The legal bit: These are my opinions and own view of legislation and process. I accept no liability whatsoever for any outcome as a result of anyone invoking any or all of the advice given - clarify your own personal stuation with an insured legal professional.

Saying that, I've used these methods against many of these corporate crooks:evil: and won hands down!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your answers, most appreciated.

 

Last two thing si promise... just working out whether to take the plunge!

 

Firstly, I noticed that orange put some entires on your credit record AFTER you had changed it... does this mean thaty entries can still be placed on it (I would want this to happen to gain a good credit history)

 

Secondly, THe credit accounts you have applied for, were any of them instant, online decisions?

 

That is some awesome information you have provided us with which i expect credit reference agencies would rather us not have...

 

Thanks again

  • Confused 1

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Orange issue was actaully in the reverse order - my post was merely highlighting the two methods.

In the case of Orange, I had them change the 1,2,3 markers early this year. I took the A-Bomb "stop automating my data" approach with all three more recently... apologies if the post gives the impression of reverse chronology!

 

The telcom application was instant online - I was there in the shop as they tapped it in.

 

The credit card app was a paper application sent to their head office for approval. Presumably that was done online - they never phoned me up to say that they had to seek my permission for a manual decision.

 

The job application was an online process and the printout was later sent to me.

 

I actually discovered this little gem on a recent course that I was doing about the Data Protection Act and medical records, for a contract that my company is involved with.

 

The course leader was a Data Protection Act guru and when we went through section 12, the words "credit worthiness" hit me between the eyes. When I asked him if that mean that credit agencies can also be barred from automatic process decisioning, he smiled and said "Yes, but not many people in this country know about it".

 

After the course, I was straight home and powered up Word...

 

"Dear Mssrs Equifax/Experian/MyCallCredit... :D

This time the boot is on the other foot and I am hereby giving you a darn good kicking...

 

or words to that effect... ;)

  • Confused 3

I'm often a sarcastic SOB and speak my mind (and I don't do PC at all), but I have a laugh as I go. I won't be intimidated, and I don't take prisoners... so live with it, or go get yourself a humour implant :p

 

Copy of Law book from Amazon…£19.95, Refund Request stamp...32p, LBA stamp...also 32p, Court fees...£750.00,

The look on the bank's barrister's face, when they lost the '£25k Mother-of-all unfair charges' cases...(plus his £8k+ of costs)... Priceless!

 

The legal bit: These are my opinions and own view of legislation and process. I accept no liability whatsoever for any outcome as a result of anyone invoking any or all of the advice given - clarify your own personal stuation with an insured legal professional.

Saying that, I've used these methods against many of these corporate crooks:evil: and won hands down!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

xr537,

 

Great writing and great work.

 

One thing I note which could also work is, if I decide to take the plunge (I have the right to from the DPA) then if I decide to change my mind, I equally have the right to change back to automated decisions?

 

Sounds good if that is the case!

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...