Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax Credit - case going to C/Court


turnedworm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5558 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am being taken to court - the date is set for this Friday 13th.

 

I am self employed and my wife and I claimed Tax Credits a few years ago. I supplied the Tax office with estimated figures. The business struggled for three years and it was all I could do to stay in business - let alone file accounts and all the red tape etc. I know this is no excuse!

 

Anyway at the start of last year the Tax Credit dept asked for all the money back c.£5k. This was 3 years worth of award. I phoned them as I had three years of self assessment figures being processed by my accountant. A few days later I phoned them back and gave them the figures over the phone. As my actual figures were less than the estimated ones I expected that they would owe us money- though I didn't expect to get it as the numbers were late.

 

A few weeks later they sent the statement for the three years in question and it was clear from this that they had recorded the numbers incorrectly. They had put the figure from the wrong year on one statement and left the estimated figure on the other! The result was that they still thought I owed £2k!! I saw their error and phoned to have it corrected and sent a letter correcting them. They wrote back 3 months later saying it was too late to resubmit the correct numbers and the case was closed.

 

A while later a CCJ came through for me and my wife. I have submitted the relevant forms and the case goes to court this week. I have spoken to the Collections Dept in Bristol who have brought the case and they say that they cannot update the figures!

 

I feel I have a reasonable case as they took the figures (late) once and miss recorded them. As these were given on the phone it is hard to prove though. When this error first came to light I spoke the the Tax Credit dept and even offered to travel to Preston to sit and talk it through with a member of staff but was told this can't be done.

 

I have a question about the court case itself - my wife has been on anti depression drugs and just got off them. She would be far happier for me to go on my own on Friday. Would it be OK for her to send a letter to the court to explain this and that she is happy for me to put the case on my own? Has anyone had any similar dealings with the Tax Credit Dept? It seems a very one-way system as if the error was in their favour they would be (and indeed have) quick to claim it back.

 

If the correct figures were put into the system it would show they owe us money and not the other way around.

 

Any thoughts would be great!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the news is not good. Tax credits overpayments are collected using the same powers as income tax arrears: once an overpayment decision is made, you have 30 days to appeal.

 

Once the overpayment goes to the court stage it is just a formality: the Revenue just register the decision notice as a court judgment, there will be no investigation into the circumstances once this stage is reached.

 

You could request a late appeal. The request must go to the tribunal service and an independent tribunal chairman will consider if there are good grounds for the appeal being late. Illness could satisfy this, but it is a fairly high bar.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My main argument is that they are the ones who incorrectly recorded my figures. They accepted these figures and amended the numbers - albeit incorrectly.

 

If they had correctly entered the numbers when I phoned them in last Feb then it wouldn't have gone to court. Should I have requested a recording or transcript of the original conversation when the figures were given? Is it too late t do so?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just reading through my files before the case tomorrow. In one letter from the court the judge / Court sent a letter stating that he considered the claim falls "outside the civil procedures rules practice direction 7d".

 

Does anyone know what this means?

 

When I took my allocation questionnaire the court staff seemed a little confused as to why I had been instructed to do so in a case with HMRC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - shall let you know!

 

I'm not looking to get the money that would have been due - my actual self assessment figures were in late. I'm just trying to show that I shouldn't have to pay the money back that they paid out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

The case has been adjourned - the judge was not sure if she had the jurisdiction to judge on Inland Revenue matters. It seems it doesn't come under the civil procedure rules mentioned above but that's not to say it doesn't come under others.

 

Rather confused now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...