Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How do I 'link' a letter without posting it publicly. Sorry for stupid question.
    • Rather than dsunaks lies, lets look at the reaL Data and real black holes in the UKs budget - all created by the poop Tories   Public sector finances, UK: April 2024   Main points Borrowing – the difference between public sector spending and income – was (a black hole of) £20.5 billion in JUST April 2024, the fourth highest April borrowing since monthly records began in 1993. Borrowing in April 2024 was £1.5 billion more than in April 2023 and £1.2 billion more than the £19.3 billion forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Public sector receipts grew by £1.6 billion compared with April 2023, however, this growth was outstripped by a £3.1 billion increase in spending over the same period. Since our March 2024 publication, we have increased our initial estimate of borrowing in the financial year ending March 2024 by £0.8 billion to £121.4 billion, now £7.3 billion more than the £114.1 billion forecast by the OBR. Public sector net debt excluding public sector banks (debt) at the end of April 2024 was provisionally estimated at 97.9% of gross domestic product (GDP); this was 2.5 percentage points more than at the end of April 2023, and remains at levels last seen in the early 1960s. Excluding the Bank of England, debt was 89.9% of GDP, 8.0 percentage points lower than the wider debt measure. Public sector net worth excluding public sector banks was in deficit by £703.4 billion at the end of April 2024, a £93.5 billion larger deficit than at the end of April 2023.     and the Tory legacy of financial mismanagement  to be passed on :   UK government debt 2023 | Statista WWW.STATISTA.COM Government debt in the United Kingdom reached over 2.25 trillion British pounds in 2022/23, compared with 1.83 trillion pounds in... - and graph does NOT show the increases as it should  
    • yep. if they send no paperwork by the time mediation comes to be able to make an informed decision upon mediation..you refuse it. keep reading up here dx  
    • uncle, why you think the last 2 years I did not not do this lol - 90% was keeping my partner sane... but after explaining everything and that we have a plan she is feeling a lot better about it.
    • That's very interesting to hear! I received a notification of a CC verification from Coles in Australia on the 12th May - also a Sunday evening. Not having been to Oz for about 30 years I was somewhat suspicious and so immediately cancelled the card. Guess what, it's the one I use to pay Lyca with........... If you've got any further information I'd be interested in hearing it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax Credit - case going to C/Court


turnedworm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5563 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am being taken to court - the date is set for this Friday 13th.

 

I am self employed and my wife and I claimed Tax Credits a few years ago. I supplied the Tax office with estimated figures. The business struggled for three years and it was all I could do to stay in business - let alone file accounts and all the red tape etc. I know this is no excuse!

 

Anyway at the start of last year the Tax Credit dept asked for all the money back c.£5k. This was 3 years worth of award. I phoned them as I had three years of self assessment figures being processed by my accountant. A few days later I phoned them back and gave them the figures over the phone. As my actual figures were less than the estimated ones I expected that they would owe us money- though I didn't expect to get it as the numbers were late.

 

A few weeks later they sent the statement for the three years in question and it was clear from this that they had recorded the numbers incorrectly. They had put the figure from the wrong year on one statement and left the estimated figure on the other! The result was that they still thought I owed £2k!! I saw their error and phoned to have it corrected and sent a letter correcting them. They wrote back 3 months later saying it was too late to resubmit the correct numbers and the case was closed.

 

A while later a CCJ came through for me and my wife. I have submitted the relevant forms and the case goes to court this week. I have spoken to the Collections Dept in Bristol who have brought the case and they say that they cannot update the figures!

 

I feel I have a reasonable case as they took the figures (late) once and miss recorded them. As these were given on the phone it is hard to prove though. When this error first came to light I spoke the the Tax Credit dept and even offered to travel to Preston to sit and talk it through with a member of staff but was told this can't be done.

 

I have a question about the court case itself - my wife has been on anti depression drugs and just got off them. She would be far happier for me to go on my own on Friday. Would it be OK for her to send a letter to the court to explain this and that she is happy for me to put the case on my own? Has anyone had any similar dealings with the Tax Credit Dept? It seems a very one-way system as if the error was in their favour they would be (and indeed have) quick to claim it back.

 

If the correct figures were put into the system it would show they owe us money and not the other way around.

 

Any thoughts would be great!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the news is not good. Tax credits overpayments are collected using the same powers as income tax arrears: once an overpayment decision is made, you have 30 days to appeal.

 

Once the overpayment goes to the court stage it is just a formality: the Revenue just register the decision notice as a court judgment, there will be no investigation into the circumstances once this stage is reached.

 

You could request a late appeal. The request must go to the tribunal service and an independent tribunal chairman will consider if there are good grounds for the appeal being late. Illness could satisfy this, but it is a fairly high bar.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My main argument is that they are the ones who incorrectly recorded my figures. They accepted these figures and amended the numbers - albeit incorrectly.

 

If they had correctly entered the numbers when I phoned them in last Feb then it wouldn't have gone to court. Should I have requested a recording or transcript of the original conversation when the figures were given? Is it too late t do so?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just reading through my files before the case tomorrow. In one letter from the court the judge / Court sent a letter stating that he considered the claim falls "outside the civil procedures rules practice direction 7d".

 

Does anyone know what this means?

 

When I took my allocation questionnaire the court staff seemed a little confused as to why I had been instructed to do so in a case with HMRC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - shall let you know!

 

I'm not looking to get the money that would have been due - my actual self assessment figures were in late. I'm just trying to show that I shouldn't have to pay the money back that they paid out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

The case has been adjourned - the judge was not sure if she had the jurisdiction to judge on Inland Revenue matters. It seems it doesn't come under the civil procedure rules mentioned above but that's not to say it doesn't come under others.

 

Rather confused now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...