Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Include that in your witness statement along with that letter as an exhibit.
    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

just started cca request, help


paulrob2808
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5362 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have posted else where on here but been advised to start my own thread so here it is, sorry about repeating myself but i thought i should outline what has happeded so far.

 

I sent a cca request and only received the standard T&C back, the account was a Goldfish account going years back but seems to have changed to barclaycard so them sending a barclaycard T&C dose not make sense as i have never signed anything with barclaycard. The original CCA would be a goldfish one and i wonder if they would have it still, the amount of data that would have to be transfered from goldfish would be huge.

 

what i have just done today is sent the following letter to them which i was told would do.

 

 

Further to your letter dated 27 February 2009 In response to my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the document provided is a standard copy of the current Terms and Conditions only. A copy of the executed agreement relating to the alleged account was not forthcoming.

 

However, as I am sure you are aware, this does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer credit Act and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the same act.

 

Whilst the account is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, make any further charges to the account or pass the account to anybody else.

 

I now request that the relevant documentation is provided in relation to the above account. I require a true copy of the executed agreement, the terms and conditions relevant at that time and additionally a statement of account providing a complete breakdown of how the alleged debt was calculated.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

I shall also be considering further action to recover unlawfully applied interest and charges that have been levied on the “Agreement

 

Yours faithfully,

 

I have also been told to apply for a sar , can someone explain what this is and why i should request it and how i go about doing this.

 

Thanks and i hope someone can help.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PR,

 

You're unlikely to get the Agreement back from BC using the CCA request - the T&C's is their answer and, as far as they're concerned, they've complied with your request.

 

Read Link No2 in my signature below about using the CPR route to get your Credit Agreement.

 

If you've had any penalty charges on the a/c in the last 6 years but don't have all your statements, send them a SAR. Then you can set about reclaiming these charges. Read Link No1 in my sig're - Reclaiming Guide.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which letter have you sent.

 

If you're reclaiming charges, it should not be necessary to involve the FOS as BC will repay your charges.

 

If you are referring to getting sight of your Credit Agreement, the FOS are not involved in this. If BC fail to respond to your CPR request, you take them to court to seek an order for the production of the document.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PR,

 

You still haven't said which letter you sent.

 

Even though there's no money involved, you take them to court to get an order for production of the credit Agreement. This is explained in the early posts of the CPR thread.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the one i sent

 

Further to your letter dated 27 February 2009 In response to my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the document provided is a standard copy of the current Terms and Conditions only. A copy of the executed agreement relating to the alleged account was not forthcoming.

 

However, as I am sure you are aware, this does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer credit Act and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the same act.

 

Whilst the account is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, make any further charges to the account or pass the account to anybody else.

 

I now request that the relevant documentation is provided in relation to the above account. I require a true copy of the executed agreement, the terms and conditions relevant at that time and additionally a statement of account providing a complete breakdown of how the alleged debt was calculated.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

I shall also be considering further action to recover unlawfully applied interest and charges that have been levied on the “Agreement

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PR,

 

They won't agree with your view and will continue to harass you re this account. So you need to think ahead and plan your next moves.

 

If you've had any penalty charges on the a/c in the last 6 years, have you got all your statements to list the charges on a Site spreadsheet.

 

If you don't have all the statements, your best move now will be to send BC a SAR. As well as getting you statements for the last 6 years, the SAR will also demand sight of your Credit Agreement.

 

If they fail to provide this as well, you could complain to the Info Commissioners Office.

 

If you're unsure of the Reclaiming process, read Link No1 in my signature below.

 

:)

 

If they fail to provide this, you can complain to the

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

hi, just an update, i have not had a reply to my last request to BC and i dont know what to do next, the only thing they have sent me is a copy of there standard T&C but they were Barclaycard ones and the original agreement would have been a goldfish one, can someone advise me what i can do next. i was thinking of getting a solicitor to write to them .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PR,

 

i was thinking of getting a solicitor to write to them .
IMHO, that would be a waste of good money.

 

BC are unlikely to respond any differently to a sol'r than they are to you. Your strategy should be to ask the right questions and take the right action.

 

I suggest you look at the CPR approach as already mentioned above.

 

You have not said whether you think there may be charges on the a/c which you can reclaim. Have you sent a SAR or do you have the nec'y statements already to see if you've paid penalty charges.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for that, there is not any charges involved as i have paid the min amount every month , I have just sent a letter from your link 2 which ,like you said does not use the 1974 act, so i will see if that gets a response. Thanks for your help. PS i dont think i will use a lawyer . lol. do you think i should also start a cpr , i dont really know how to but if i did , what would they have to give me. Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PR,

 

See how they respond to your 1st CPR letter, and take it from there.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

well, time is up and not a word from them, this is so wrong. how can i make them sebd this. can i write to them and state that i believe the account isd now in dispute and i will not make any payments until i get a copy of my agreement. will i drop myself in it if i do this. I dont think they have it as it was a goldfish card taken out years ago and BC have taken over the account . help please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PR,

 

Time to send 2nd CPR letter as per Pt2537's thread.

 

Also, if you want to stop pay'ts because of their failure to supply the agreement, send a CCA request first.

 

Use Letter N from here with the £1 fee - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-bailiffs-advice/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

You can then stop payments after 12 + 2 working days. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have already sent a cca request which they replyed by sending me general terms but not a copy of my agreement, i then replyed but had nothing back, i then sent your template letter, all were sent recorded. How do i stand stopping payments. will it affect my credit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paulrob

 

Yes it will effect your credit file stopping payments certainly short term.

 

You will find even though thye shouldnt, they will register adverse information against you.

 

I am going down PTs CPR route with BC and approaching N244 stage, I have maintained minimum payments on my card because I can afford to (for now anyway), but it depends on your circumstances.

When the account is in dispute they should not ask for payment but they will...I havent read an instance where any card company has played correctly with this respect.

 

I would follow PTs advice with the CPR route, keep all correspondence, send eveyrthing recorded and build up a strong audit trail for later.

 

Hope that helps and good luck.

 

Fingers

The Story So Far...

 

Barclaycard - Fingers Vs Barclaycard

Egg - Egg Credit Card CCA Agreement - help

Halifax - Halifax Credit card CCA

IF - CCA received

Lloyds - Lloyds CCA

MBNA-CCA received, challening

Virgin - Virgin Card CCA May 2006 - Help Required

 

OH Barccard - 2 s78 letters, on 2nd cpr

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers for that, i am also paying min payments and i think i will until i know i have a case, i do wonder if they even have the cca because when they took the goldfish accounts over there would have been a lot of data on accounts and i wonder if that why they do not reply, its like sending the BC terms, i never took or signed anything with BC so would that mean i have never agreed to BC terms. should they have writen to me stating they had taken on the goldfish accounts and asked me to agree to a new CCA with BC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PR,

 

Just because they haven't sent you a credit agreement doesn't mean they don't have one. They are just not sending them out to anyone.

 

Well, not BC a/c's anyway. They have sent out some Monument Agreements - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclaycard/197322-barclays-monument-credit-card.html#post2139887

 

When they took over the Goldfish a/c's they would have written to you confirming this, but there would have been no new agreement for you to sign.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the contrary PaulRob !

 

They are realising that people no longer back down or roll over just because they're a big bank.

 

They vast majority of CAGgers, who took banks to court before the OFT test case, won their claims.

 

The credit cards are repaying penalties, almost on demand.

 

And those who defend claims brought against them regularly win in court.

 

One word of advice though - don't threaten to take the bank to court unless you really intend to. It's not so hard and any costs you incur will normally be reclaimed from the bank. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, here is a copy of the letter recieved along with the BC standard terms. The say they have to give me a copy of my excuted agreement so how can a terms and conditions sheet be an excuted agreement concidering the original agreement would be a goldfish one anyway. should i now send the second letter on link 2 or is there something else i can do. I have sent them the standard with a £1 fee and also the first letter on link 1. It has a second page to the letter saying , This completes our obligation to you under section 78 of the consumer credit act 1974

 

 

 

BCletter11004.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PR,

 

You'll get no further with them using the CCA request.

 

You should therefore now take the next step of the CPR strategy.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...