Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • all DYL's are subject to a TRO. looking at this newish, ever increasing as old ind units have gotten removed, estate, there are only lines on one side, on the other there is a parking lane with traffic calming through which you mention. i seriously doubt your mate has any clue what he is talking about.!! its not a private housing assoc estate. so its a public council owned road. no construction co can just decide to draw their graffiti on a road. the DYLs are certainly there pre 2016 even before his home was built. now ive had a quick look to see if the main access to royal park road has signs. there is no royle park road even on your map but there is a royal barn road which leads to where you are parked royal road has a restriction sign on the pole by the fence of the electric substation jnc with gipsy lane there does not appear to be one leading in from the other end - tesco petrol station
    • Hi All. I was driving in Stevenage down a 40 road after coming off the motor way, i noticed my car felt a little "weird" i accelerated, then slowed the car down.  Shortly after i got stopped by a manned police car with a laser. During the stop the officer stated i was doing 54 in a 40, the conversation was short, but he said i would unlikely get a awareness course and it was most likely 3 points and a fine.  Mrs thought it was a good idea to have dairy when she is lactose intolerant on date night, we just got on our way.  At the time, i didnt admit to the offence, but did say i didnt realise and had slowed down in any case. The officers chest camera was recording and on. At the stop, he asked where to send the fine to, as i knew i would be travelling to visit family up north, i provided my temporary details at that location in Yorkshire. It is now 05/05 and i haven't received anything at either my home address in Stevenage or the temporary address. 1. Is there a time limit in which paperwork needs to be sent to me. 2. Should i query the ticket as i don't want to miss any deadlines (if so who do i check with?) OR should i keep quiet. 3. Given nothing has arrived in 20 days, is there a chance of appeal if and when it comes through? Many thanks CrazeUK
    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CL Finance / Howard Cohenn.. Help Needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5158 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I'm hoping someone can help me out please?

 

Originally I had a Marbles card taken out in 2002, I found myself in finacial difficulties in 2005 and agreed a reduced repayment with Marbles (HFC bank) for £20 per month.

Around june 2008 I recieved a letter from a company called CL finace requesting payment £20 or legal action will be taken against me. I phoned CL finance they told me they now owend the debt from HFC and I should now pay them. I continued to pay HFC for the next month then I recieved a N1 court claim from howard coheen on behalf of CL finance claiming £5100 the amount i owed HFC.

After seeking advice from citizens advice I defended the claim and also after seeing this great web site I sent in a CCA request.

CL Finance sent me a response saying they will provide me with the information as soon as they can.

I then recieved the allocation questioner from the court which i filled in a returned.

after about 2 weeks the case was struck out as howard coheen had not returned thier allocation questioner.

 

I recieved a letter from howard coheen 12th Jan 09 stating that they did not want to pursue legal actiona and that payments should continue at £20.

 

I have sent CL finance a default notice for the CCA request sent.

 

I had a call from CL finance stating that I should continue payments and the default notice for the CCA request was not valid. I advised them that I would not discuss this over the phone and they should sent it to me in writing.

I've not recieved anything yet and feel i need to send them something?

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are playing games with you, send them a letter along the lines,

 

This matter has already been the subject of a court claim, by yourselves, the case being struck out by the Honourable Judge xxxxxxxx on DATE, the claim number being xxxxxxxx, i do not expect to hear from again

Yours etc

 

end of

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Creditcard mug..

just one last question before I send it off.

My defence for the last claim was not based on the fact that no credit aggrement was in exsistance athough i did request it during the claim, the defence was based on the fact that I had not missed a payment to HFC.

 

I get the feeling that Cohens are going to send another claim through anytime.

 

If your letter advise still applies its in the post tomorrow.

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if they came up with an agreement, then the basic facts would change, so they may be able to convince the court to allow them to bring a fresh claim.

Cross that one when you come to it, still send the letter

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Howard Cohen & co finally go in touch.

 

I recieved a letter today which states the following

 

Dear Mr*******

 

RE: CL Finance LTD and Yourself - Balance £****.**

 

Northampton - 8XXXXXXX89

 

it is with concern that we note you have not made payment of this debt as arranged.

 

Further delay cannot be tolerated and you should note that if a remittance is not received at this office BY RETURN OF POST our instructions are to apply to the Court for Judgement to be entered against you. If this course of action is necessary further costs will be incurred which you will be responsible.

These costs will be added to the judgement debt.

 

We trust that the above mentioned action will not be necessary but should we no receive payment no further notice will be given.

 

If you wish to discuss this matter please telephone 0870 751 3281

 

Yours faithfully

 

Howard Cohen & Co

 

 

 

 

 

It looks like a standard letter to me, what do you think I should do now?

They are claim number is the same number that was struck out.

Edited by Helpmeoutplease
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got the court order striking out the case? if yes then this letter must have been sent either by an office junior or an idiot

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that I recieved anything i writing from the court, I phoned them the day after the deadline day and they told me it had been struck out. I then recieved a letter from Cohen's saying they were not pursuing legal action as long as i paid £20 per month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone the court tomorrow to double check, ask them to send you a copy of the judges order, theres no point in considering a next move until we have this

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been in touch with the courts and the case was struck out, they will be sending a letter out to me. I asked if howard cohen should still be refering to the claim number on there letters and the court said they could apply to the judge to re-open the claim.

But for now the claim is struck out.

So what next

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would have EXTREME difficulty in trying to resurrect this, not least because you would object to it

 

My advice ignore them for now, unless they involve the court again, if they do we can go for them (highly unlikely)

 

Once you have that court order in your hands, you are home and dry IMO

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I recieved a letter from the court which states:

 

 

Before An Officer Of The Court sitting at Northampton County Court Northampton NN1 3QH.

 

Upon non compliance with court order of the 05 January 2009

 

IT IS ORDERED that

 

The claim is struck out.

 

Dated 13 March 2009

 

 

 

Now I have this letter what do you suggest my next action should be, does this now mean they have no more legal power to hassle me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I recieved a letter from the court which states:

 

 

Before An Officer Of The Court sitting at Northampton County Court Northampton NN1 3QH.

 

Upon non compliance with court order of the 05 January 2009

 

IT IS ORDERED that

 

The claim is struck out.

 

Dated 13 March 2009

 

 

 

 

 

Now I have this letter what do you suggest my next action should be, does this now mean they have no more legal power to hassle me?

 

Two options claim your costs against them, or ignore anything else they send, there's really nothing they can do and they know it...well done

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

well my friends at howard cohen have been in touch again today, i recieved a letter almost identical to the last one

 

Dear Mr*******

 

 

RE: CL Finance LTD and Yourself - Balance £****.**

 

 

Northampton - 8XXXXXXX89

 

 

it is with concern that we note you have not made payment of this debt as arranged.

 

 

Further delay cannot be tolerated and you should note that if a remittance is not received at this office BY RETURN OF POST our instructions are to apply to the Court for Judgement to be entered against you. If this course of action is necessary further costs will be incurred which you will be responsible.

These costs will be added to the judgement debt.

 

 

We trust that the above mentioned action will not be necessary but should we no receive payment no further notice will be given.

 

 

If you wish to discuss this matter please telephone 0870 751 3281

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Howard Cohen & Co

 

 

The amount of money owed has gone up 2% in 17 days.

 

This letter is dated 20th March.

 

It looks like they decided to give me further notice, how nice of them!!

 

The claim number is the same as the one struck out.

 

Any advise on what to do, is it worth sending them a letter stating that the debt is in disbute and the claim has already been struck out?

Or do i just keep ridding the storm and see what happens?

Edited by Helpmeoutplease
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...