Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject.   My original  CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  So at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them.   Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.  
    • whats the court claimform for? return of goods order? please complete this:  
    • std DWF letter. typically £157 something. lots of them here already doesn't say WILL anything. read it properly dx  
    • Have you read our upload guide [click on the word] for advice on how to post up documents? Pdf files are best, jpegs won't be accepted. HB
    • Sunak's already had enough of travelling like the little people. Rishi Sunak flies back from Devon by helicopter after gushing about 'great' train travel - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Rishi Sunak told broadcasters: 'The train was great, I've been taking lots of pictures and videos' - but he skipped the 3-hour, £55 train home in favour of...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MacKenzie Hall


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5532 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Morning I hope everyone had a great weekend.

 

Over the weekend I recieved a lovely letter from the famous MacKenzie Hall. The debt they are claiming I owe is for 1st credit and ended up in Lowell's hands at first. I CCA'ed Lowell's January 2008 and to this day I never recieved the CCA agreement. The letters still came in demanding money then all went quiet (I do have the all this in another thread).

Then the letter from MacKenzie Hall came through.

 

01MacKenzieHall.jpg

 

Ok firstly if they send anyone to my door they will be told to go forth and multiply.

Secondly how can Lowell pass this on when it is in dispute?

Thirdly does anybody have a clue what a saction is ;)

 

The alleged debt is around 9 years old and is 110% statute barred. What is my best way to deal with these idiots all help is greatly appreciated :D

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks F_DCAs I was gonna send the statute barred letter off and see what came back just didnt know if there was something else that I should of done before hand. Thanks again :)

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid I've never heard of a 'saction' before, never encountered a 'saction', and I don't think I know anyone else who has.

 

I've just come off a very entertaining Youtube argument with a guy who presumably works for or possibly even runs a collection agency (I suspect one I've mentioned by name in a clip), and one who also can't spell very well at all.

 

Had some fun there, but I don't appear to have heard from him after Friday. Shame, I was just beginning to enjoy myself.

 

I just can't figure out why those on the other side of the fence are just so inarticulate, without exception.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sanction??? aahhhh its actually making sense now. Thought it was maybe a scottish word that i was unfamiliar with ;)

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

has anybody ever got a decent reply from Mackenzie Hall when emailing them? I have sent off the statute barred letter but today I thought sod it and sent it an email version of it to around 6 Mackenzie Hall email addresses (well I thought if they can fire loads of letters to me why cant i lol). Finally got a reply from a Mr. Michael Dorrans saying they couldnt discuss it over email but he would gladly help if i phoned him (as much i wanted to phone him and give him a load of verbal i resisted temptation). I did email back saying that the letter was on its way anyway and that I wanted a speedy reply to state that the account was statute barred and that they would close their file on this and wouldn't be in contact with me again. Still waiting a response (which I now doubt will come lol)

 

Is this the usual response from them or has he just fobbed me off?

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are unhappy at putting anything down on paper because that creates a paper trail which can, and would, be used against them if they were stupid enough to take anyone to court.

 

Its about all they can do to string a sentence together in an e-mail. In another thread they have claimed e-mail is not a proper form of correspondence. Well it is where I work and that's in a business where paper trails count a lot.

 

Insist on everything in writing and if they demand you call them instead refer the matter to the regulators.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick replies guys. So I just sit and wait and see what they say about the statute barred argument. From what I have read I'm not actually expecting them to read it and I'm just expecting more threat-o-grams off them. After that is it the Complaints line? Or is it possible to nip up to scotland with some of my friends and make a doorstep visit ;)

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent. Well if they get in touch with more threats I will just sit it out until they vanish. If they get in touch and agree with me then thats great. If they just vanish then thats fantastic. Just half waiting for Meritforce to pay me a visit. Will chase the muppets right down the street if I have to lol. Thanks again for all your help. No doubt I will post on here again if I get anymore serious trouble off these clowns :p

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem. Will let you know if they EVER turn up and will point them in your direction. Just make sure you have the kettle back on our maybe just microwave that cold cup of tea :p

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning,

 

I got a lovely email last night off Michael Dorrans stating the following:

 

Again thank you for your recent communication, unfortunately the claim that your outstanding account is statue barred are unfounded. This account has been outstanding since its default on the 24th November 2003, therefore the laws found within the limitations act 1980 do not apply to your outstanding account, As a result your balance of £X,XXX.XX is still owed and legally pursuable. Payment is due to be paid no later than noon on Friday 13th March 2009 to prevent the account being referred back to our client with the recommendation to pursue further action against yourself.

 

I thought when a default was placed on me this had nothing to do with the statute barred time limits (otherwise would they ever default people). Their is no default on my credit file either. I thought the statute barred timer started when i last made payment or acknowledged the debt not when they decide they want to place a default against me?

 

Oh I have to pay on Friday............nah can't be bothered doing that lol ;)

 

What would be the best thing to send back to my new found friend Michael??

 

Thanks again :p

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could but I'm starting to enjoy my new found friendship with Michael. Am I right in what I am saying though Mr. Ton? I really want to email him back and tell him this. If I know I'm right I will start getting in touch with OFT etc. Thank you for your help by the way :D

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

The time limits starts from the date of the last payment masde to the account. This does not necessarily tally with the banks/original creditor's date. If you want to be entirekly certain ask your new found friend to provide documentary proof of the last payment made. If he can't you expect him to go away

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks NailPost, I have emailed him saying that the statute barred time starts from when the last payments was made on the alleged debt or when the last acknowledgement was made on the alleged debt NOT when the default was placed on it. Also asked him to send me prove if he thinks I am wrong. I finally told him that if he cant then a final communication should be sent to me saying the case is closed. If it isnt and they continue to harrass me then I have informed hom that I will be going to the OFT and Trading Standards.

 

After all that I just hope my new found friend invites me to the pub for a "we are sorry for harrassing you" pint. If he does I will make sure everyone gets an invite lol. Thanks again :p

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh now I have a new friend, a Mr. Mark Lafferty (I want to lafferty at him). He seems to be getting a little hot headed with me. Here is the email i recieved:

 

Dear XXXXX,

Perhaps you did not read, or comprehend my colleagues message.

Your account is not Statute Barred.

Failure to meet repayment by the afore mentioned deadline may result in a recommendation being passed to our client, to instruct further action against you in order to recover the monies owed by yourself. I strongly urge you to contact our offices upon receipt of this correspondence, to discuss the repayment of your debt.

Ignoring this matter will not make your problem go away XXXXX. Please call me today.

 

Eagerly awaiting your response & with best regards

 

 

Sooooooooo I have sent the following reply:

 

Dear Mr. Lafferty,

 

Perhaps you are not understanding what the law clearly states. You and your collegue are telling me that the account is not statute barred but as the law states this is not from when the default starts.

 

Unless you can prove to me that this debt is not statute barred then I suggest that you tell me that the case is closed and that I will have no further communication from yourselves.

 

Eagerly awaiting your response

 

Oh this is turning into sooooooo much fun lol. Any comments will greatly be appreciated :p

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...