Jump to content


Teebum V Abbey **** WON !!!! ****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6151 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 362
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Teebum,

 

Yes the 8% interest should go up on a daily basis on your spreadsheet, However remember that it is only a small amount. On my claim for over £8K it is only £1.55 Per day. So check the amount before deciding that the spreadsheet you is using is crap. If the defendant has not given you the information required to issue your claim ten they are at fault not you. You requested such information under the data protection act, so there fore you should be entitled to it.

regards bish

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have today received a letter from SHabbey, they are now sorting out the microfiche statements for me. Can this hold up the court action, the Judge is at the stage of allocating track

 

Hello teebum

 

It should'nt necessarily hold it up. I think that there are 2 ways to go about it:-

 

1. You can write to the Judge & the shABBEY asking for their consent for you to change the amount, explaining your reasons, and see if they are OK for you to do it.

 

If that fails, then:-

 

2. You will have to put an amended claim (N244 form) into the Judge as your amount you are claiming will obviously be different, but at least you will have the evidence to prove what you are claiming. This will cost you £35 which is not re-claimable.

 

Your best bet will be to phone the court and ask them what you should do, explaining to them all that has happened, and the difficulties you've had in getting your info from the bank because of their incompetence!!!!!

 

But then again, even though they have told you they are sorting out your microfiche for you, you can carry on regardless unless they supply you with the microfiche in the mean time!!!!!!!!!

 

Keep at 'em

Phil:)

This is only my personal, honest opinion!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found this on the forum (Tina and Gaz) is it worth sending to court?

 

With reference to the above claim, I have received the defence from the defendant and feel this is not complete in that the calculations required to prove the costs of the purported breach of contract are not included within the defence.

 

In your indulgence, I would respectfully ask, sir, that you order disclosure of the calculations which justify the charges in question, that the Defendant may intend to use to defend the claim.

 

I understand that it is within your discretion to do so.

 

I believe such an order would bring a rapid end to this litigation.

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last point in Abbeys devence states

 

" No admissions are made as to the amount claimed by the claimant and the claimant is put to strict proof of the same"

 

What does this mean?

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Karn

As we speak the postman has dropped a letter from the court through my door. Here are some points I am unsure of in the letter, it has been allocated fast track.

 

"The trial of this claim will take place during the period commencing 09 April 2007 and ending on 27 April 2007 at a venue to be notified"

 

"Both parties to give standard disclosure of documents by 4pm Thursday 21st December 2006"

 

"Both parties shall by 4pm on 18th January, serve on each other the witness statments of themselves and of all witnesses (other than expert witnesses) on whome they intend to rely"

 

"Complete pre trial check lists shall be sent to the court by 4pm on Tuesday 20th February"

 

"The claim shall be listed for trial during the trial window from Monday 9th April 2007 to Friday 27th April 2007 inclusive with a time estimate of one day"

 

"Because this order has been made by the court without considering representations from the parties, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varies or stayed. A party wishing to make an application must send or deliver the application to the court, to arrive within 7 days of service of this order"

 

"No party has permission to rely on expert evidence. For the avoidance of doubt, the courts preliminary view is that evidence of the costs incurred by the defendant and sought to be recouped by way of charges is factual and not expert evidence, while evidence comapring the defendants charging regime with others within the banking industry is irrelevant"

 

I was worried before now I am absolutely bricking myself.

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

or Sarah's thread below?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/22094-sarah-abbey-5.html

 

Don't be afraid to ask any questions you may have on their threads also, or send them a Private Message(PM). I wish I could be of more help, but I'm a little behind you, waiting for a court date, so I have'nt even looked at the Court Bundle templates yet!!!!

 

Phil:)

This is only my personal, honest opinion!

Link to post
Share on other sites

good stuff, was up till 2am printing docs. Just need to photo copy statements and correspondence from them. Thanks again. Did you think it is worth sending your letter to the judge?

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yer know what really relly hacks me off, is that shabbey. reading the judges last para, should have thrown in the towel there and then, instead they are going to make tee do three bundles, settle out of court and then quibble about expenses. but well done Tee, can you smell the money yet? ;)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...