Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fart: “Boorish cartoon misogynist.” “Cheeto-dusted cartoon villain.”      Michael Cohen says he used to be ‘knee deep in cult’ of Trump as he stands firm in fiery cross-examination ‘Knee-deep in the cult’: Michael Cohen holds his ground against Trump’s attorneys WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Trump’s attorneys want to undermine the former ‘fixer’ after damning testimony connected him to a criminal hush money scheme   Doesn't nodfathers lawyers/fans realise that anything they say about cohen being a crim reflects mostly on the guy he was crimming for? aka Trump LOL
    • Notice how Kev goes about his scam.  In Kahunaburger's case they left the car park well before the time shown on the ticket they had purchased.  But because Kev added on the time taken to look for a parking spot and queue to pay/try to get an internet signal he still sent them an invoice. So If you had left before the Justpark message, say at 3:55, Kev would still have managed to turn that into a stay of 4:06 and thus an overstay and an invoice. Unfortunately for Kev, judges have ruled against his reasoning.  Have a read of this famous case  http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2014/03/waiting-for-space-is-not-parking.html  
    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Teebum V Abbey **** WON !!!! ****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Damn, got myself all gee'd up to go to the court and work prevented it, can't go till Tuesday now. Still no funds entered into account.

 

------------------------------------------------------------

31/07/06 sent Data Protection letter to Abbey.

09/08/06 Recived fob off letter

14/08/06 Sent second Data Protection Act letter

15/08/06 Received 12 months of statements

17/08/06 Received another 2 months of statements from 2005

19/08/06 Sent prelim letter

29/08/06 Received sorry you are unhappy letter

04/09/06 LBA sent

11/09/06 Sent non compliance letter

11/09/06 Recieved a second sorry you are unhappy letter

14/09/06 Another letter saying they are investigating

18/09/06 Received letter with good will payment letter dated 11 sept, as of 21st sept money still not credited

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 362
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Canayone help me to respond to this letter, I phoned Abbey this morning and said that I have never at any time accepted this as full and final settlement, and told them that I was very angry that the man had decided that I had. Told them that my N1 had gone to court and I was claiming the full amount.

 

Dear Mr ******

 

Thank you for your letter dated 4th September 2006 about your bank charges. Since then I have fully investigated your complaint and I note thhis complaint has been investigated by my colleague under our ref: ***/******.

 

Our records show a refund totalling £965.00 was made recently to your account. As I understand, this complaint has now been settled in full and final payment. As such I will close this record as settled.

 

I have enclosed a leaflet about the Financial Ombudsman Service, just in case you are not happy with my investigation or decision. If so, you should contact them within six months of the date of this letter, enclosing a copy of it, as they would need this for their investigation.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Dave Smith

Senior Customer Resolutions Manager

 

Enc. Financial Ombudsman Service Booklet

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case I would just carry on regardless for the full amount. If you have been offered but not received a GOGW there is no need to pay it any attention and no need to reduce your claim.

 

I would also be tempted to reply to your most recent letter advising that they are incorrect in their assertions. You have not received any payments from them nor have you agreed that any such payments would be in full and final settlement - then remind them you have filed in such and such a court for the amounts detailed in your previous communications.

 

Is your Abbey account still live ? Is there more than one - could they have paid it somewhere else ? Just be sure before you write back.

 

Failing that just ignore them and wait to communicate with DLA Piper

 

 

Elle

Link to post
Share on other sites

The good will gesture has now gone into my account in the form of lots of refunded charges. I need to write to him and somehow say that i accept the GOGW but not as full and final settlement. I have no idea on how to word this, told the lady on phone today that my N1 is now with the county court.

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tee

 

Ring the court and advise you have recieved a payment and ask them to note it on the file. Then back it up with a letter to the court.

 

Not sure what the general opinion is but unless you have signed anything previously not sure I'd even write to Abbey - I'd wait for them to defend.

 

They'll look silly if they claim full and final settlement was agreed and have no evidence or documentation to back it up.

 

Would suggest it is crossed wires as per usual in Abbey Land

 

 

Elle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet another letter from Abbey:

 

Dear Mr ******

Thank you for your letter dated 12 August 2006 about the transaction information you have requested under the Data Protection Act. Please accept my apologies for the delay in replying.

I understand that you have already received details of the transactions and charges that are held on our computer system, which was sent to you free of charge within 40 days. You have therefore been given all the transaction data that you are entitled to under the Data Protection Act. Any details prior to this have been archived onto microfiche.

As microfiche records are not held as part of a relevant filing system, they are not covered by the Data Protection Act and will not therefore be provided to you under a Data Protection Act(Data Protection Act) request.

We did arrange to send you this information from our microfiche records; however, it was not subject to the 40 day statutory time period. To cover our administration costs, there was a £10.00 fee which was payable at the time of your request. This is why your cheque was cashed. I note your objection to the Data Protection Act fee being used for this purpose, but it was clear from your request that you required the earlier data, and we did not want to delay the process unnecessarily.

I am therefore, satisfied that we have complied with your specific request in accordance with the Data Protection Act.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dave Rayment

Senior Customer Resolution Manager

 

What do I do now?

Is this non compliance?

Can I add non compliance to my court claim?

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a 'Notice of Issue' from the court today. Is there any actions I need take with this? The bottom part of the form is for a Request for Judgment, am I right in thinking this part is for Abbey's response?

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I thought I would send:

 

Dear Sir,

I would like to add to the claim above that Abbey have made a Gesture of Good will payment to me of £635.00 in the form of refunded charges on 11/09/06. Could you please deduct this amount from the total claimed. I will accept this as a partial settlement but wish to continue for the balance of the claim.

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tee

 

If it were me I would miss out the form of refunded chagres bit - just finish the sentence at £635.

 

I only advised the court of the amount and the date received and Abbey did not deduct the GOGW from my settlement figure meaning in reality I received 100% back on the day the AQ was due.

 

Not crucial just a thought.

 

Kepp smiling

 

 

Elle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it be a good idea to make a list of all the missed acknowledments by Abbey, so that we can Email Abbey solicitors and tell them that we intend to inform the court of them, to prove Abbeys time and money wasting tactics. We could also point out that a firm of solicitors that miss so many acknowlegments is starting to look a little unprofessional. Maybe even the Judge,s will start to go against Abbey for reasons of time wasting.

Lets get it back

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...