Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The reason I asked was that the Director said you only appealed once to  Bank and appeared to ignore that you also appealed to the IAS who gave the pointer what he think happened. Could it be that the director deliberately ignored the IAS decision and hoped you wouldn't mention it?
    • Hi BankFodder, Thanks for the reply.  I will take your advice and read through more thoroughly. To answer your question, the value of the laptop is £255.  When filling in the online form to prepare the shipment it asked what the contents of the parcel was and the value and I specified "laptop" and "£255". Thanks.
    • Before you start this claim you need to have a lot more confidence in what you're doing which means that you need to understand the way forward in the principles involved more thoroughly. We will help you and you will probably get your money back but this is a self empowerment forum and so you have to do your bit as well. Please will you spend at least the next couple of days reading through the stories on this sub- forum. Try to understand them thoroughly. We have lots of stories very similar to yours but even those which are not similar, have principles in them which apply. In particular you need to read and understand the information in the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum. I know that you have been reading around here for the past couple of hours but it needs a lot more. You aren't in a huge hurry. Wait a few days before sending a letter of claim and also that needs some amendment as well. Come back here when you've done your reading and then we will have a look at your letter of claim and help you to refine it Also, please tell us the value of the laptop. Was it properly declared as a laptop – and was the value properly declared
    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Regular savings accounts are accounts designed for savers who put money aside every month and reward them with a generous interest rate.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

advice please!,halifax,blairoliv er,1st credit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5470 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Rose

i am not an expert on cca however do the sums on the ppi interest as far as i can see has been added to the ppi

 

given they have added interest you should has well

 

take the full amount add interest and see what you have over the term

 

this should put the all of the contract into dispute i am sure that you find this

to your advantage.

 

please we are trying to build step by step, do the sums

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

f you must speak to them on the phone, make sure your record it (but don't tell them that).

I am quite happy to be corrected but, I think you have to tell them that you are recording the call.

 

EDIT

I'll have to learn to type faster:D

 

Good to know there's more Halifax customers who were told 'no ppu, no loan'.

Edited by djgordyp

HALIFAX: 13/01/07 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter (marked as rec'd 16/01)

Paid in full in March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite happy to be corrected but, I think you have to tell them that you are recording the call.

 

EDIT

I'll have to learn to type faster:D

 

Good to know there's more Halifax customers who were told 'no ppu, no loan'.

 

 

If they say "they may be recording the call, for training or audit purposes" (which is most likely) then as I understand it, this will negate their privileges and protections.

 

Perhaps an opinion from an old lag is required.. anyone ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rosie Posie

 

When was this loan taken out?

 

Tosh1

hello Tosh1, thanks for reply, this was a top up loan, taken out in 2004, can anyone look at the cca i posted to see if i's TRUE and ENFORCEABLE, i intend to get the ball rolling with HALIFAX, PPI ,we have never received any letters from halifax assigning the debt and even when passed to blair oliver ,they accepted £10 month (did not know about this site then or that we had protection rights ) thanks for all support rosie posie

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they say "they may be recording the call, for training or audit purposes" (which is most likely) then as I understand it, this will negate their privileges and protections.

 

Perhaps an opinion from an old lag is required.. anyone ??

The operative word being may. It's not unknown for recordings to be unavailable.

 

hello Tosh1, thanks for reply, this was a top up loan, taken out in 2004, can anyone look at the cca i posted to see if i's TRUE and ENFORCEABLE, i intend to get the ball rolling with HALIFAX, PPI ,we have never received any letters from halifax assigning the debt and even when passed to blair oliver ,they accepted £10 month (did not know about this site then or that we had protection rights ) thanks for all support rosie posie

 

Snap. At least now I can say this appears to have been company policy.

HALIFAX: 13/01/07 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter (marked as rec'd 16/01)

Paid in full in March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for all advise so far, but can anyone please look at my at my CCA, and let me know if it is true,also what do i do about LCS letter, they do make you feel if time is running out to panic you rosie posie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Imho the prescribed terms are there, but also (imho), I think it falls over flat on the miss-selling of PPI. If that is the case, then I believe this account can be marked in dispute.

 

I'm hoping an old lag will spot this and provide the definitive answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rosie Posie, I haven't looked at your CCA as it is the same as mine. However I never thought of the PPI bit making the agreement unenforceable..

 

One other thing, and I need clarification on this as well. It is my understanding that a tickbox or similar should appear on the agreemant to indicate that you agreed to the PPI. Hopefully someone will clarify this.

 

:oops: oops just checked. It is on the application form.

Edited by djgordyp

HALIFAX: 13/01/07 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter (marked as rec'd 16/01)

Paid in full in March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

can someone get back to me asap , to advise on what to do next, i will be sending my letters to halifax by recorded delivery monday ,what to do regards 1st credit/lcs letter giving 7 days before action, do i send any letter? any comments on why they are chasing my partner,when debt in both names? thanks rosie posie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. A copy of which is enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on **DATE**.

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore

 

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation.

 

This limit has expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Lilly

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

does any one reading know if the cca i posted is the real deal ? is everything there that should be , have never received letter of assignment from halifax thanks rosie:sad:

 

If you're sure no NOA has been sent then I honestly don't know the legal implications of that. However, there have been threads on here before where

NOA's have been produced by 1st Credit themselves. Furthermore, they are

an attempt to look like they come from the OC. The envelope is a giveaway (Reigate postmark), however, it is believed they have the OC's permission to do this. Send off the PPI letter (can you post a link to it - I couldn't find it).

 

As you rightly say, the CCA you posted should be verified for compliance with your request, I'm hoping someone more experienced than I can do that.

Edited by blipvert
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting.

 

Firstly Blair Oliver Scott, is taken from the initials of Bank Of Scotland, which owns Halifax, which is known as Halifax Bank Of Scotland (HBOS) which is now known as LLoyds Group, obviously because they (lloyds) brought out HBOS, which is a crying shame, coz it should of gone down the swany HBoS that is.

 

Now also..

 

You are allowed to record telephons calls under Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. (RIPA ), and you do not have to tell the other party that you have or are recording the call, so long as it is used for your own purposes and not contents of which are not disclosed to a third party, whoever that third be.

 

BUT also...

 

LCS solicitors are one and the same a 1st Crapit, they work shoulder to shoulder with the same monkeys, there is only one, solicitor, a tramp one at that, with no morals. LCS have recently purchased a THREATOMATIC V3000 with QUAD PAPER TRAY, so they will be firing these off all day long, I know this because I had and LCS letter with the same threat, that was 2 weeks ago, my advice to LCS is DO IT! whatever makes you happy.

 

And Finally...

 

I have PM'd somebody to come along and look at your agreementT

 

DO NOT WORRY BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT, YOU PANICK MAKE AN OFFER YOU CAN'T AFFORD AND YOU BECOME EVEN MORE WORRIED.

 

LCS Solicitors initials mean Ladronism Cacaesthesia Sanguisugent Solicitors,

 

Hello to all the 12 Guests from Reigate reading this, thats right you....stop picking your nose

Edited by Oh Boy!

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks mozzat6 and oh boy, just a point , if halifax had sold on the debt ,can they refuse to deal with the mis-sold ppi from 2004,? how i could kick myself on being ignorant on all these finanace matters, thank heaven for people like yourselves prepared to help point us in the right direction rosie

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you baby bear39 ,fingers crossed they'll roll over and admit defeat :) can anyone comment on my cca i posted, it could be one more line of defence if it is not enforceable, got lcs letter dated 4th ,seven days from then they will advise 1st cretins on action ,anyone what happens next? kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...