Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA Advice -NO Reply from MBNA?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Clemma,

Thanks for the quick reply....seems like your always on hand to give advice;) thought the same thing regarding that sentence btw.

 

Im guessing they dont have one but would rather not just sit and wait till they apply defaults, which im sure will have a massive effect on my credit rating and then eventually selling the dept to some useless DCA months down the line. this will no doubt cause alot more hassle.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they default you while it's in dispute then that is against OFT guidelines. You will have to battle to get them removed - but with persistence you may win.

 

As for the DCA's - well if they come on the scene, you need only send them one letter to send them packing :) As it is in dispute, MBNA cannot pass or sell this on to anyone - again its against OFT guidelines.

 

The minute MBNA start mis-behaving is when you must complain to the OFT, FSO and Information Commissioner. For now, I would sit tight until they make their next move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was just wondering where within sect. 189 it descrbes terms ...

"under Section 189 of the CCA 1974. and I consider that you have failed to comply with my request for these documents"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi. all

MBNA have just sent me a copy of an agreement, it is a copy of the original however it is has been photo copied onto an a4 sheet back and front. the copy is unreadable in parts but this is probably down to the photocopier. (btw its one of the lick this edge and post pack applications) the cancelation section statates that a copy of of details on how to cancel will be sent in the post. this was not included with the agreement and i dont think it was sent at the time the account was opened.

 

Also i need advice with PPI, this was taken out at the time of account opening but nothing about this is in the agreement>?

 

Thanks in advance for all you help and comments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would help if you are able to scan it in, edit out your personal info, barcodes and any references that might identify you first.

 

You could also have a look in the MBNA document library to see if there is anything similar to yours. Link below

 

http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/609-mbna-agreementsapplication-forms

 

HTH

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any opinions on the following agreement much appriciated.

 

MBNA sent me a the following CCA it was photocopied on a single sheet of A4 paper front and back.

 

they say that all the predescribes terms are there even if it is "slightly" illegable in parts!??:?:

 

Edited by user2006
Link to post
Share on other sites

i have also found all my all statments and letters from when the account was opened. Ie the letter the CC came stuck to and a seperate letter about Protection payments. Will these be of much use??? Ie multiple agreement requirements!

i can upload the CC letter (it has the T&C's .)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Links below are to the original letter i recieved with |CC when account was first opened

 

the Interest rate looks wrong to me. my credit limit was £2000 they show examples for £1000,£3000 or £5000.!??

 

front

 

not quite sure what's the next step....the CCA they sent me obviously does not contain (or at least not visibly from the photocopy,) all the predescibed T&cs.

 

Should i complain to the FSO or just wait for them to make the next move?

Edited by user2006
Link to post
Share on other sites

First off they send you a copy of the application form, which was unenforceable, and now they are trying to fob you off with a bunch of T&C's that bear no link to you :rolleyes:

 

Send them the following letter if you want, it's up to you as to whether you think they are worth the cost of a stamp:

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account Number: XXX

 

Re: your recent reply to my request under section 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

I note that you have replied to the above by sending your companies Terms and conditions I must inform you that this is not sufficient to comply with the request and that your company is still in default under the act.

 

To clarify, just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement.

 

This breach of the agreement can be demonstrated as follows;

As you will know section 180(1) (b) authorises, “the omission from a copy of certain material from the original, or the inclusion of certain material in condensed form.” This refers to statutory instruments made under the heading Copies of document regulations and in this care in particular to SI 1983/1557.

 

Before leaving section 180 there are two other sections that should be remembered these are:

 

Section 2(2) (a) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not satisfied unless the copy supplied is in the prescribed form and conforms to the prescribed requirements;

 

And more importantly

 

Section 2(b) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not infringed by the omission of any material, or its inclusion in condensed form, if that is authorised by regulations.

 

You will see that this quite clearly states that whilst certain items may be left out of the copy document the rest of the document must be in the form and contain all items as prescribed by the regulations.

 

Turning to the regulations regarding what may be omitted from these copies these are contained with SI 1983/1557.

 

The regulations state:

(2) There may be omitted from any such copy-

(a) any information included in an executed agreement, security instrument or other document relating to the debtor, hirer or surety or included for the use of the creditor or owner only which is not required to be included therein by the Act or any Regulations thereunder as to the form and content of the document of which it is a copy;

(b) any signature box, signature or date of signature (other than, in the case of a copy of a cancelable executed agreement delivered to the debtor under section 63(1) of the Act, the date of signature by the debtor of an agreement to which section 68(b) of the Act applies);

 

It is quite clear what can be omitted from the copy document, this again asserts that all other details of the agreement should presented in form and content as required by the regulations.

 

The requirements of the Agreement regulations 1983/1553 are very explicit in describing the form and content of an agreement and this as I have demonstrated also applies to the copy of any such agreement with the above mentioned proviso.

 

Nowhere within these regulations does it state that part of the agreement can be presented on a separate document headed terms and conditions.

It does state that all terms and conditions should be within the agreement document and is explicit of the form in which it is presented.

 

I hope this explains why your reply was unacceptable I await a True copy of my agreement and would remind you again that whilst the request has not been complied with the default continues

 

Yours faithfully

__________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi clemma thanks for your response.

The document that they sent in response to my request is the application form that i filled out. It does seem to have some of the required terms but its hard to read in places. sorry for all the questions but i thought that application forms are CCAs as long as they contain the relevant t&Cs.?

 

How can i be sure that the copy of the document they sent me is unenfocable/? In my opinion it in unenforcable as it has no mention of the PPI that was taken out.,...but im sure thats not the only reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The T&C's are unenforceable as you have not signed them - therefore they are no bearing on any agreement you may or may not have with Virgin. They could apply to anyone - and they must apply specifiacally to you by way of your signature. The application form from earlier is also unenforceable as none of the prescribed terms are mentioned.

 

I don't think you are going to get any further with these clowns to be honest. You can send the letter I have sent above, but I know they will reply saying they have complied with the CCA1974 request (although you will know better than that).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first two documents you have put up look suspiciously like microfiche copies, therefore I would tend to think they will not have the original. They are very poor copies and to be enforceable, they must be completely legible and in their original state.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first two documents you have put up look suspiciously like microfiche copies, therefore I would tend to think they will not have the original. They are very poor copies and to be enforceable, they must be completely legible and in their original state.

 

I have edited the identifiable bits out, but im sure they have the original as it had shade marks around the edges from where it was photocopied. just my opinion....! im sure that these application forms have 3 sections.

 

MBNA Wasting my life away!!! Taken 4 months approx to get that application form from them...ohwell.....lets just wait and see what happens.

 

Will keep you updated and thanks for your support Clemma.:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...